He is one of the most well known humanists in the Renaissance because he expressed humanism in his poems. His poems contain many “values of the world of chivalry, such as love and fidelity. It influenced Cervantes, Spenser, and Shakespeare” (Gale 1). Not only did his poems provide support for humanism in the Renaissance, they also inspired some of the greatest poets and writers of that time. It is very remarkable that Ariosto’s work was admired by shakespeare because he is considered the greatest writer and playwright of all time. Just like his comedies, Ariosto wrote poems until the day he couldn’t because he finished his great narrative poem right before he died. This just shows his dedicated to his work and is a main reason why he had so much impact on the Renaissance with his poems. Ariosto may have been a humanist, but he did use satire in some of his poems to show the flaws in humanism. He had a humanist education, but “he attacked humanists as being immoral and suggested that their teachings were incomplete and sterile” (Andrews 1). This just shows his ability so see both sides of a subject.
He is one of the most well known humanists in the Renaissance because he expressed humanism in his poems. His poems contain many “values of the world of chivalry, such as love and fidelity. It influenced Cervantes, Spenser, and Shakespeare” (Gale 1). Not only did his poems provide support for humanism in the Renaissance, they also inspired some of the greatest poets and writers of that time. It is very remarkable that Ariosto’s work was admired by shakespeare because he is considered the greatest writer and playwright of all time. Just like his comedies, Ariosto wrote poems until the day he couldn’t because he finished his great narrative poem right before he died. This just shows his dedicated to his work and is a main reason why he had so much impact on the Renaissance with his poems. Ariosto may have been a humanist, but he did use satire in some of his poems to show the flaws in humanism. He had a humanist education, but “he attacked humanists as being immoral and suggested that their teachings were incomplete and sterile” (Andrews 1). This just shows his ability so see both sides of a subject.