This is a quote from John Nash's fictional Nobel Prize speech. In actual fact, he was never asked to speak upon his acceptance of the prize. Regardless, this combination of words still speaks a powerful message, one that contradicts western society's modern beliefs that love is irrational. He states that the only logical reasons lie within a feeling, an emotion that we have termed 'love'. Nash was a man who lived his life based on "verifiable, empirical data". He believed in something only when he could explain why. So why then would a mathematician of such high status ever state something that so blatantly went against his system of belief?
I believe that this statement came as a result Nash's ordeal with schizophrenia. Because of his mental disease Nash was forced to look at life in a more idealistic way. His trust in substantial proof was challenged because his senses had betrayed him. His mind was no longer trustworthy. He saw and talked and interacted with people that did not exist, people that only he could see. Everything he believed in was based on his ability to prove its truth. When his judgement turned out to be flawed he needed to discover another way to find the truth, a way that could differentiate his delusions from reality; a new form of logic.
Logic is defined as the science or method of reasoning. Most reasoning is dependent on visible, inarguable fact. However, John's new logic depended largely on the effects of something. He knew that his delusions had no interaction with the physical world. The little girl as she ran through the pigeons could not scatter them no matter how much she shouted and "the prodigal roommate" could not open doors on his own. In observation of this his decisions about whether something was real or not depended on the effect it had on reality.
John Nash goes on to say that his wife's love is the only reason he stood on a stage in Switzerland accepting the Nobel Prize. That she was the only reason he was alive; solely because of her love and devotion, her faith in his ability to overcome and her belief that something extraordinary was possible. The astonishing effect that love had on his mental health was in fact his "verifiable, empirical data". No other person had ever before lived normally with schizophrenia, yet Nash was able to overcome his delusion and continue his work exclusively because of the support his wife's love provided.
When John Nash asked his future wife whether or not their love warranted a long-term commitment she asked him, "How big is the universe?" He replied, "Infinite." She retorted, "How do you know?" and he replied, "I know because all the data indicates it's infinite." She continued, "But it hasn't been proven yet."
"No." he said. She continued to question, "You haven't seen it?"
"No," he repeated. "How do you know for sure?" she asked.
"I don't, I just believe it," he responded. She finished, "It's the same with love I guess." She had challenged him to think outside simple definitions of reality and to trust in what he knew in his heart to be right instead of what could be proven by an algorithm. So there must be some truth to his statement. There may be no physical presence of love but it can be compared to the wind. You cannot see it but its effects can be felt and can be seen in the most incredible works.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
John Forbes Nash Jr. is an American mathematician whose theories and ideals in game theory, differential geometry (a mathematical discipline), and partial differential equations which has provided an insight inside the factors that govern chance and events. Over the course of his life he has managed to obtain both the Nobel Memorial Prize in 1994, and just recently the Abel Prize for his work on nonlinear partials. He is also famous for having the mental disease of Schizophrenia. It’s a mental disorder that is often characterized by abnormal social behavior and failure to recognize what is real. After being officially diagnosed he found it hard to cope with the world around him knowing half of his life has been a lie. Just like everyone else he soon found ways to control the people that only exist within him.…
- 352 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Are bystanders guilty or innocent when they witness civil injustice? In the ¨Harvest Gypsies¨ and ¨Wiesel´s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech¨ we are given evidence how bystanders can be guilty. Bystanders are guilty for not speaking up to injustice. Bystanders remain silent and ignore serious situations.…
- 333 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In his arousing Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech in 1986, Elie Wiesel pronounces the importance of “taking sides” and “interfering” when a time of human suffering is upon the world. He is undeniably correct. People need to stand up for what is right in this world, and acknowledge the wrong; they need to take an issue of human persecution and make it “the center of the universe”.…
- 315 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
“Just because you’re an atheist, that doesn’t mean you wouldn’t love for things to have reasons for why they are.” (13)…
- 792 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
“The existence of God would be obvious if we weren’t distracted by life in the sensory world. And the knowledge of God saves us from doubt about other things we are certain of.”…
- 1278 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
“Love is what you feel when you don’t have enough emotion left to hate…Hate is a pure emotion.”…
- 857 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
• Nash thinks that he is superior to the other students, and too smart for classes. He also thinks all his theories to be correct. He is only partially right, as he is in fact a genius, but not quite on the caliber of his ego.…
- 2483 Words
- 10 Pages
Good Essays -
The arguments he stated has successfully convinced me that there is in fact a God, the arguments put forth establishes specific truths….. Namely that whatever we think of and see as truth is in fact so because God exists and everything in us is because of him.…
- 309 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
“I understood that the world was nothing; a mechanical chaos of casual, brute enmity on which we stupidly impose our hopes and fears. I understood that, finally and absolutely, I alone exist. All the rest, I saw, is merely what pushes me, or what I push against, blindly-as blindly as all that is not myself pushes back.”…
- 449 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
He states that whether he is awake or asleep, “it remains true that two and three make five, and that a square has but four sides.” From his perspective, these truths are so evident that they could never fall under suspicion.…
- 482 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
“To one who has faith, no explanation is necessary. To one without faith, no explanation is possible.”…
- 976 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Alfred Nobel was born on October 21, 1833 in Stockholm, Sweden. At the time of his birth, he was the fourth son of Immanuel and Caroline Nobel. Immanuel, his father, was an inventor and engineer who had married Caroline, his mother, in 1827. They had eight children, but only Alfred and three brothers reached adulthood. As a child Alfred was prone to illness, but this didn 't interfere with his love of explosives and the fundamentals of engineering. He learned these things from his father, who failed at various businesses throughout Alfred 's life.…
- 635 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“Mathematics directs the flow of the universe, lurks behind its shapes and curves, holds the reins of everything from tiny atoms to the biggest stars.”…
- 1358 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
What would you say if one morning you wake up, read by mistake your own obituary, and see what people think about you? How would you like to be called:” the merchant of death, who built a fortune, by discovering new ways to mutilate and kill, is dead”. This happened to Alfred Nobel. The story is that when Alfred Nobel’s brother died, a French newspaper mistakenly published an obituary of Alfred. When he read this, he remained pained all of his life.…
- 898 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The term logic is used quite a lot, but not always in its technical sense. Logic, strictly speaking, is the science or study of how to evaluate arguments and reasoning. Logic is what allows us to distinguish correct reasoning from poor reasoning. Logic is important because it helps us reason correctly without correct reasoning, we don’t have a viable means for knowing the truth or arriving at sound beliefs.…
- 764 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays