My professor assign us to do an essay and he gave us two statements that we have to argue in both the pros and cons of the first crusade focusing on what happened and what did the crusades did to the jewish, hungarians, greeks and arabs.…
The hard evidence that proves the crusades left a negative effect. Document one states that “ They also left a bitter legacy of religious behind them.”(unknown source) This is relevant because they left a negative effect on religion. Document four states that “Moreover the assault of one Christian on another…”(unknown source) This is important because this is another reason the Crusades left a negative impact before it was even…
Document 1 states that Christians and Muslims both committed appalling atrocities in the name of religion.…
Between the end of the eleventh and into the thirteenth century the Crusades were conducted a series of nine wars that have been come to be known as the Crusades. The Crusades were a war between Christians and Muslims. The Crusades had both a positive and negative impact on the Western and Eastern worlds that were involved in the conflict. So was their more of an negative or positive impact of the crusades? There was more of an negative impact on the Crusades because the Crusades left hatred and and bitterness for the Christians and and Muslims.…
Many have wondered was the impact of the crusades more positive or negative. In 1095 Pope Urban 11 was promoted by the incursions of the Byzantine emperor, and declared his first crusade. It was a big fight of both of the biggest religions Christianity and Islam.The Crusades were remembered bitter, because they started religious hatred and killed innocent people. For instance in Europe, the crusades turned their anger against jews massacring entire communities, which means they killed instinct and people who didn't deserve it.…
The effects of the Crusades led to the weakening of the feudal system and were a major element causing the fall of Constantinople. The Crusades had a lasting effect on many things, but specifically feudalism. Throughout medieval Europe, feudalism remained, but it was severely weakened by the crusades. Feudalism relied on the lords (nobles) giving fiefs (units of land) and protection to the vassals (receiving persons), and in return, the vassals would fight for the lords. This system also relied on the serfs, who would work the lord's land and grow crops, and in return, would be able to live on the lord's land and have a stable living condition.…
The Second Crusade: Discord between the Crusader states Tyler Rathke HIS 111-601 After the end of the first Crusade, three Crusader States were created in the East. The three Crusader states were the Kingdom of Jerusalem, the Principality of Antioch, and the county of Edessa and after the first three Crusader states were developed, a fourth was added called the County of Tripoli. The social, political, and economic factors throughout the Crusader States led to the cause of the second Crusade and planted the seeds for the beginning of the third Crusade. The County of Edessa was located farther North than the rest of the Crusader states, which made it less populated and caused it to be the weakest of the Crusader states.…
Empathy is shown towards the affected Muslims, but also towards the thousands of Crusaders who were blindly led to believe that what they were doing was the only way to earn a place in Heaven, therefore justifying their violent wrongdoings. The focus is on their original intentions, which were good because they were trying to regain land for Christ. “As we aim to represent the image of Christ however, there will be times when the truth of His word will not always sound appealing, but it will always remain necessary. The Crusades were intended for good, but as humanity tends to do, they were altered from their course because of violent…
The Crusades were defined as several ‘holy wars’ against the Muslims and Christians all crammed in one all staining medieval history forever. Many of the Crusades incidents are recorded as major and some minor causing many to wonder if the result of the Crusades more negative or positive. The Crusades were obviously more negative than positive because of amount of religious hatred and how the Christian Crusades showed their aggression.…
The Crusades was a series of wars fought from 1096 to 1291, it was a result of growing tension between the Christians and the Muslims, which led to religious upheaval. The Crusades played a critical part in history as it was the Christian's response to Pope Urban II’s speech to reclaim the Holy Land, Jerusalem, in order to regain economical and autocratic power. However, it was the rising tension between the Christians and Muslims that caused the Crusades to escalate and impact the middle east in the way that it did. On November 27th 1095 Pope Urban II gave one of the most influential speeches of his time, ordering Christian men to join a fight against the muslims making them believe “God wills it!”.…
Have you heard of the Crusades before? Well if you haven’t the Crusades were a group of people that believed strongly in the Christian religion. They had big crusades around Europe giving Jews and Muslims the choice to either convert or die. The first crusade was in 1096. They burned the Jews and Muslims alive leaving 5,000 victims and 1,000 deaths. The Crusades also had a big influence on the Holocaust. The crusades started anti semitism which led to the anti semitism during the Holocaust. The crusades…
The Hundred Years' War, was a conflict between England and France, was not actually a single war that lasted a hundred years; instead it was a series of wars interspersed with periods of peace that began in May 1337 and ended in October 1453. The three main conflicts were the Edwardian War won by English king Edward III; the Caroline War won by French king Charles V; and the Lancastrian War won by French king Charles VII. The Hundred Years' War was the outcome of disputes between the ruling families of the two countries, the Plantagenets in England and the Capetians in France. Since 1066 the English had controlled rich agricultural areas of France, and the two countries had often fought over these territories. In the 1300s marriages between English and French nobles meant that both English and French kings had a claim to the French throne.…
Please create two journal entries. For the first journal entry you will write as if you are a Crusader. You should discuss the long journey it took for you to reach Jerusalem, your reasons for participating in the Crusades, and any fears you might have. For the second journal entry, you will take on the role of a muslim living in the city of Jerusalem writing about the Crusaders and the attack on the city.…
The Crusades were “wars fought to regain holy land from the Muslims” (Perry, Chase and Jacob). These Crusades were fought by the Christians. The first Crusade was started by Pope Urban II in 1095 and in 1099 it resulted in a successful capture of Jerusalem. The second Crusade was to recapture the city of Edessa from the Muslims, and were humiliated and failed. The third Crusade was to recapture Jerusalem from the Muslims, which also failed due to illness. The fourth Crusade was to again, try to take back Jerusalem, but instead, they took over the Christian capital, Constantinople, and never got to the holy land (Asbridge)…
1. Pope Urban II (source A) and Saladin (source C) were similar in attitudes because they both believed that God was on their side and would make them victorious amongst their enemies. In Source A it states “Accordingly, undertake this journey eagerly for the remission of your sins, with the assurance of the reward of imperishable glory in the kingdom of heaven.” The Pope is declaring that as long as Christians willingly participate in the First Crusade then there will be a place for them in heaven. Source C states, “we will cross over with Gods good pleasure and take from you lands in the strength of the Lord”. Based on this quote it is clear that Saladin and his people are positive that God will be their strength. These sources are similar in the fact that religion is their argument.…