Preview

Loose Constructionists Dbq Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
591 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Loose Constructionists Dbq Analysis
Conflict over foreign and domestic policies between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson led to the development of two political parties. Although the Jeffersonian-Democratic were strict constructionist and the Federalists were loose constructionists, both failed to be consistent and chose whichever interpretation that better served their interests at the time.
Jefferson originally began as a strict state’s rights advocate. He only accepted the Constitution with a guarantee of the Bill of Rights that reversed many Federalists policies, (Doc. A).Jefferson supported the separation of government and religion that can be seen in the Bill of Rights that promised freedom of religion. However as President he did not make major changes in the government.
…show more content…
Following George Washington’s two-term policy, Jefferson handed down the presidency to fellow, Democratic- Jeffersonian, James Madison, (Doc. C). Because of the problems inherited from Jefferson’s term, the majority of Madison’s decisions consisted of loose constructionist decisions. First was the Non-Intercourse Act. This watered-down version of the Embargo Act served to instigate the War of 1812. Because of the New Englanders disliked the restrictive trade laws, the Federalists party regained a little of their popularity back. Federalists responded by joining together to propose amendments to the Constitution in the Hartford Convention in 1815 that favored strict constructionists. Also Daniel Webster, a Federalist, argued against expansion of the governmental powers by opposing military conscription, (Doc. E). Another loose constructionist’s act was the Protectionists Tariff of 1816, which aimed to promote American manufacturing, (Doc. D). It placed a tariff not specified in the constitution and was advocated by the supposedly strict constructionist Thomas Jefferson. However South Democratic-Republicans argued against due to the unfavorable nature to the South and chose a strict interpretation of the Constitution for justification, (Doc. G). Overall, Madison enacted only one significant strict constructionist decision in vetoing governmental funding for infrastructure, …show more content…
Madison, the Hartford Convention and opposition for military conscription showed their willingness to switch advocacies when it conflicted with their personal interests. The same applied for the Jeffersonian- Democratic displayed through the actions of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. Thomas Jefferson served to expand governmental powers and Madison enacted only one strict constructionist act throughout his presidency. Therefore, the political views in the political party did not align well with the decisions followed through by the party

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the two political parties were still somewhat true to their founding ideas, but not completely. The different parties had started to let go of their strong stances and instead begin to take a more, middle of the road viewpoint. The Jeffersonians began to sway from their strict constructionism partly, as they passed things like the 1st Bank of the United States, which went against almost everything the Jeffersonians were for and allowed the government to read-into the constitution. As the Jeffersonians started letting go of their ideals, so did the Federalists.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson, for example, could not immediately abolish Adams' national bank because it would be too drastic a move for someone with his popularity, despite the fact that it was established without the Constitution granting that power to the federal government (Blum). Jefferson's most grand defiance of his strict interpretation of the Constitution was his purchase of the Louisiana Territory. Even though he was not given the power to purchase land in the Constitution, Jefferson couldn't pass up the opportunity to double the nation's size at a time of such large-scale westward movement. After his presidency (1816), Jefferson wrote a letter to Samuel Kercheval (document G) that gave his support for change to the Constitution with change to the times, which is a very far leap from claiming that nothing could be done in the national government without the Constitution granting them the power to do it. Madison is guilty of the same deviations from typical Republican strict constructionist policy. He was attacked by John Randolph (document F) for being too much like a Federalist, particularly when using the national government's power to set tariffs like the one proposed in 1816. This was not the first time Madison was attacked for his pseudo-Federalist policies. He received abundant criticisms…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson vs Alexander Hamilton, one of the chief rivalries at the center of American politics through the first two decades, split the nation by ideology and purpose. Hamilton, a staunch Federalist, and Jefferson with his agrarian democracy, could not agree on much in regards to the structure and role of government. During the first term of the Washington administration, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were both serving on the Cabinet as the Treasurer and Secretary of State respectively. Their constant disagreements over fiscal policy, such as Hamilton's proposal for a central bank, led to Jefferson's resignation from the administration. President Washington would hold a grudge against Thomas Jefferson for the rest of his life after the latter formed an anti-administration party with James Madison. The factionalism caused by the Alexander Hamilton vs Thomas Jefferson rivalry would eventually lead to the formation of the country's first political parties. Hamilton's Federalists held the early advantage over Jefferson's Republicans, later known as the Democratic-Republicans.…

    • 516 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This was considered broad constructionalism because normally Jeffersonians would try to limit military spending and expansion of their military, yet the decision to go to war was not changed. Most did not agree with the war, but it was most unpopular in New England where citizens were extremely dependent on trade.The Constitution stated that 2/3 must support the war before it can be declared but Jefferson believed he had the final decision (E). Federalists complained that the Consitution did not state anything about enforcing a draft, and that it would be similar to creating a dictator (D). Another way in which Federalists began to exhibit strict behaviors was by setting up the Hartford Convention. This showed that they were trying to secede from the war against Britain, but began the downfall of the Federalist party due to their disloyalty. All of these things show how each party gradually switched their views on the Constitutions…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Jefferson’s presidency, he implemented an embargo that required a strong central government to enforce.(Doc F) As a result of the embargo, manufacturing grew more rapidly under Jefferson than that of the federalist leader. With the band of trade, America became dependent on nation made products which helped grow the manufacturing industry drastically. By 1812, John Adams began to approve of the two Republican presidents’ restoration of the taxes and the Navy.(Doc G) Jefferson had restored taxes while he held office, while Madison worked on building back up the Navy. Even though the Founding Fathers were both finding a moderate ground, others were not adjusting. During both presidencies, the tariffs kept and enforced were disliked by some Republicans. Southern Democratic-Republican farmers rejected the protective tariff created by Madison because it lead to higher prices.(Doc H) These tariffs were set by Hamilton, and enhanced by Republican…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Jefferson and Hamilton struggle offered ascend to political parties by separating groups on opposite political sides. The voters adjusted themselves behind the one that had the most thoughts pleasant to that individual. As now, individuals in those days voted in favor of things that profited them the most. Voters vote in their own particular self-interest. Hamilton was a Federalist.…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ 2

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Madison issued the very first protective tariff in 1816, which John Randolph talks about in his speech to the House of Representatives (Doc F). “Their Principle now is old federalism vamped up into something bearing the superficial appearance of Republicanism” (Doc F). Randolph accuses Madison of being just like John Adams by loosely interpreting the Constitution’s Commerce Compromise to raise revenue in government (Doc F). The only provision of Hamilton not passed by Congress was one that called for a protective tariff. It was viewed by southern merchants as being a violation of our tenth amendment, which protected state rights.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton was a federalist who believed in a strong central government. Thomas Jefferson was a democratic republican who wanted states to have strong power. Hamilton and Jefferson were competing to get their way. Hamilton point of view was best for America. Hamilton want the best for the country not for himself, he wanted to help bring upon a good strong federal government, and he thought that Jefferson was to dangerous for the country.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rather than the best vision of a future, one must have the best suited vision to lead a country. In America, two political parties formed called the Federalists and Democratic Republicans. They formed due to the different views of Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, two secretaries of Washington’s Cabinet. White Jefferson was a Secretary of State, Hamilton was Secretary of Treasury who had very distinct and opposing views regarding the ruling of America. However Jefferson had the best plan for America as he knew the people and wanted to keep liberty for all with experiences.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Jefferson often showed a strong dislike for the Federalist laws and programs, when he took office he left many of the Federalist programs intact, and except for revoking the excise tax, the Hamiltonian system was mostly left as it was. However, this act of Jefferson’s went against many of the political beliefs held by his party and himself. Jefferson and Hamilton’s philosophies differed greatly in that Jefferson adhered to a weak central government, with most of the power in the hands of the states. He believed that the federal government’s power should be restrained and limited, so that it would not be able to become tyrannical or try and undermine the power of the states and the people.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before presidency, Thomas Jefferson believed that the constitution should be interpreted very strictly, but during his presidency his views were flipped. James Madison, on the other hand, believed that the constitution should be interpreted loosely before and during his presidency. Before Jefferson was elected, he, and the majority of the Jeffersonian Republicans, believed that the constitution should be interpreted very strictly. He believed that there was a necessity for “preservation of the Federal Constitution, according to its obvious principles” (Jefferson Document A). Jefferson writes of how a large portion of citizens (Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison) “support principles that go directly to a…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas the Republicans argued that Jay’s treaty was too appeasing, yet the Senate still ratified it. Particularly, in the Election of 1796 when John Adams became president this weakened the Republicans even more. Adams upheld the Federalist pro-British foreign policy and supported Hamilton’s financial plans. As mentioned above, the Federalist attacks against the French Republic raised a great disturbance and protest among the people at home. The rivalry came to an enactment of coercive acts by the Federalists in order to limit the rights of the party system.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With respect to the Constitution, Jeffersonian Republicans were casually characterized as strict constructionists who opposed the broad constructionism of the Federalist Party. By the end of John Adams’ presidential administration in 1800, two political parties emerged with opposite philosophical views of the Constitution; to shift once the democratic-republicans took office. When the revolution of 1800 propelled the democratic-republicans into office, Jefferson and Madison found Alexander Hamilton's financial structure to be advantageous. The “necessary and proper” clause of the Constitution was expanded by both Jefferson and Madison to address threats to national security. In order to counter the democratic-republicans, the federalists resorted…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The origins of partisan politics can be traced back to the 1790’s during George Washington’s presidency. It stemmed from a widening gap in in the ideological framework of the government and the vision for the future United State of America. Alexander Hamilton, the Secretary of the Treasury, felt it was necessary to create a strong central government. A government that favored the wealthy at the expense of farmers and average citizens. This group who showed loyalty to the national government, called themselves the Federalists. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison held a different view of the future of the republic, one that empowered the states more than the national government. The main concern was that a national government that held too…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays