Preview

Louis XIV and Henry III Lived very simmilar lives. What were the main differences in their lives and what caused their kingdoms to be so different?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
797 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Louis XIV and Henry III Lived very simmilar lives. What were the main differences in their lives and what caused their kingdoms to be so different?
While reading The Splendid Century, I was struck by the uncanny amount of similarities between two seemingly unrelated kings; Henry III and Louis XIV. Although they had remarkably similar childhoods, their lives took shape as diversely as possible. Both kings were orphaned at a very young age, at a desperate time for their countries. They were needed to fix the problems their predecessors had so foolishly created. Being put under similar circumstances, their kingdoms were ruled as differently as possible. Louis created one of the most powerful empires of the time, while Henry made his fathers failures a reality. I was intrigued. These kings lives began similarly, where did they diverge? My analysis suggests, both these men faced similar circumstances growing up and they were both were born with similar temperaments, yet their lives turned out differently. Perhaps, this is because Louis mastered his nature while Henry allowed his temperament to control himself. The reason Louis was able to master his nature was because he was able to make sensible choices when need be.

The early life of Henry and Louis shared similar formative experiences. Both became rulers at very young ages. They had to deal with a devastating civil war, neglected by their predecessors "The people of England, who had been despoiled and torn by civil war" (Pg. 7) "The Fronde has been compared with the contemporary civil war in England" (Pg. 5). The responsibilities these kings had to deal with were enormous. Their childhood's were considerably different compared to other kings, not only because they were orphans, but since they had many freedoms other princes did not. Their lives were carefree since there was nobody to reprimand them.

Louis and Henry's individual personalities became apparent during their early adolescence. Louis became very interested in his sexuality, and continued to be throughout his life. However, Henry never was inclined towards the opposite sex, this is proven by the fact

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Controlling nobility was important to Henry and arguably posed to be one of the biggest challenges he faced. He relied on them for a number of reasons but he also knew the importance of keeping them under control, since they had been responsible in part for overthrowing the last three kings at one time or another. As well as financial policies, he also passed a number of non-financial policies, which contributed to the change in relations between the nobles and the crown during his reign.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XVI’s rule was defiantly not similar to the Rule of Napoleons rule when you get down to the basics. Louis XVI and Napoleon Bonaparte were two of the most significant rulers in French history for many different reasons. Being so young the inexperienced Louis XVI led France into the beginning of a bloody French Revolution. Napoleon on the other hand launched France to the top in Europe shortly after. Louis XVI and Napoleon differed in three main categories including: qualifications, domestic policy, and foreign policy.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    William Jefferson Clinton was one of the greatest presidents to govern the United States as opposed to the Bush's. Clinton proved to the world our preeminence by way of control, economic growth, and policies ranging from Israel to social security. The Bush's proved to the world that they won the election. Louis XIV and the Stuart Kings also compare in similar ways. Louis XIV was a sound leader whose foresight and character led to the greatness of France, along with delegating authority to great economic and military leaders. The Stuart Kings possessed no foresight or character, many thought of them as stupid and stubborn, and the way they governed their country was reckless. Louis XIV prospered through absolute control, economic growth, and military reform. Where as, the Stuart Kings failure was due to no real control, economic turmoil, and civil war. The most important factor in the success of Louis XIV and the failure of the Stuart Kings was control.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Firstly,they were both autocrats,in that all decisions of state had to be approved by them.Secondly,they both wanted to curb the power of an ambitious nobility.However,they achieved this aim differently; Louis made his court at Versailles the centre of power,so the nobility had to spend all their time there if they wanted to have any influence.This kept them away from their own provincial power bases,making it hard for them to plot against the king.Peter on the other hand tortured and murdered any nobles he suspected of disloyalty.The main difference between the two was that Louis was ruling a cultural advanced,modern state - Russia under Peter was still very backward compared to major European states,so Peter worked hard to modernize Russia.Finally,both built up strong armies and used them for territorial expansion, thus increasing the prestige of their countries. Firstly,they were both autocrats,in that all decisions of state had to be approved by them.Secondly,they both wanted to curb the power of an ambitious nobility.However,they achieved this aim differently; Louis made his court at Versailles the centre of power,so the nobility had to spend all their time there if they wanted to have any influence.This kept them away from their own provincial power bases,making it hard for them to plot against the king.Peter on the other hand tortured and murdered any nobles he suspected of disloyalty.The main difference between the two was that Louis was ruling a cultural advanced,modern state - Russia under Peter was still very backward compared to major European states,so Peter worked hard to modernize Russia.Finally,both built up strong armies and used them for territorial expansion, thus increasing the prestige of their…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Henry is independent and takes care of himself along with his wife. He is slowly losing his independence due to health related issues. He is alert and oriented x3. He had a stable job in his past. He is also making responsible plans for him and his wife’s future that will benefit them.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis X1v Research Paper

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When he woke up is was always late in the morning and all of his servants were waiting patiently for him to awake to ask him for his commands or if he needs any attending .The king then ate breakfast, returned to his council chamber. A couple hours later came dinner, Louis sat alone at his small table but his servants and mistresses were expected to be there with him. Then he would take a nice walk threw his glorious gardens. There usually was a hunt at the end of the day. There were always balls and going on, party’s receptions etc. Everyone always dressed to the…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Mr. David Starkey, Henry VIII (the king) was far from similar to Henry VIII (the kid). Instead of researching through the records of the Royal Chamber, Starkey was able to find more details about Henry VIII’s early childhood in the Exchequer. The Royal Chamber wasn’t implemented yet until King Henry VII invades France back in 1492. By scavenging through the documents of the Exchequer, Starkey found a window where he could look at how Henry VIII was before all those wives and before becoming a king. To Starkey, how Henry VII was raised was a very crucial part of his life because it would explain how much of an influence it had made on his way to the throne and also during his reign at the throne.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Henry IV—a young man who must grow up to become king, take on his responsibilities…

    • 3599 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Henry Vs Patho

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Comparing two things can sometimes be like comparing a red apple and a green apple and other times like apples and oranges. In this case we are comparing Henry V, this great king who is honorable, noble, and a great leader and a young to some despicable peasant girl who thinks she can tell people what to do because she is a prophet from God. These two characters although have the same goals, be a leader and prove yourself to your people, could not be further opposites. In the plays Henry V and Saint Joan the difference in class is apparent with him being noble and her being a peasant, Joan of Arc was more persuadable because she was considered an underdog and didn’t follow the social norms of the time.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did King Henry's Life

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    King henry was a well mannered child… For a while. His father, king henry 7 had recently ended the war of the roses and was happily married with his wife and children. Then, disaster struck! King henry 7 got Tuberculosis and passed away. After this event, his brother Edward took the throne. Shortly after he became a king, Edward fell into agonizing pain until, well, king Henry 8 got to take the throne.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VIII as soon as you hear his name you can instantly think of something; his six wives, religious affairs and so on. Some people would see him as a ruthless murderer but on the other hand some people would see him as the countries saviour and one of the most powerful men ever to live. In this essay I will show both points of view and summarise these as my conclusion.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lets go back in time to Early Modern Europe in around 1400 AD, and examine the two very different Kings of England who ruled everything under their kingdom. They were both very great kings, but the question is: Who ruled better? Henry VII? Or Henry VIII? Henry VII, the Ruthless, Passionate gangster warrior who handled his Monetary issues like a modern day CEO, or the Overweight Hunting Enthusiast, who had 6 wives? Lets find out.…

    • 1903 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tudor dynasty experienced differing uncertainties throughout their reigns on the throne of England. From politics and war overseas, to succession difficulties. Each Monarch throughout early modern England faced conflicting challenges and hardships, nevertheless Henry VIII stands out among them all. Henry’s turbulent years on the throne presents an evolution throughout English society, culture, religion and politics, to name a few. Henry was not expected to become King, being only the third child of Henry VII, himself also an unexpected King, winning his throne on the battle field against Richard III in 1485. His early youth was not that of the first in line to the throne, due to the unexpected death of this elder brother Arthur, Henry…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King St. Louis XIV

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    King St. Louis IX became King of France when he was only 12 due to his father’s early death. Although named regent in 1226, he was too young to effectively rule a nation. His mother ruled in his stead until he was capable of ruling on his own. During this time, he was brought up in…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Powers of the King

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Powers of the king.—The King, Louis XVI, was absolute. He ruled by the divine right theory which held that he had received his power to govern from God and was therefore responsible to God alone. He appointed all civil officials and military officers. He made and enforced the laws. He could declare war and make peace. He levied taxes and spent the people’s money as he saw fit. He controlled the expression of thought by a strict censorship of speech and press. By means of lettres de cachet (sealed letters which were really blank warrants for arrest) he could arbitrarily imprison anyone without trial for an indefinite period. He lived in his magnificent palace at Versailles, completely oblivious to the rising tide of popular discontent. . . .…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays