Lowell Police Department Case Study

The four main executive styles that police administers service in the implementation of their characters are the administrator, the politician, the top copy, and the statesman. Each of the styles are reliant upon the roles that are not limited to external, but internal roles as well. In the two case studies, both the new chief executives employ different styles in an attempt to reform their departments. While Captain Ed Davis employs the “Statesman” style for the Lowell Police Department (LPD), Chief Ken Fortier practices within his dominion, the “Administrator” style for the Riverside Police Department (RPD) which in reality, have both resemblances and dissimilarities. Together the statesman style, that was used by Captain Davis
For example, Captain Davis’s style of statesman led him to personally venture out to meet with groups in the community and include their personal outlooks in making decisions such as in the establishment and execution of new precincts. On the other hand, Chief Fortier really just focused his attention solely on reforms that predominantly required implementation. One example is that he came up with new rules for the procedures that were to be utilized within the police departments; furthermore, he wanted to recruit employees outside of the department who possess higher levels of qualifications as he saw fit. Fortier also wanted to hurry employees who were nearing their retiring
Each of these chiefs’ goal was to make improve their departments by phasing out their predecessors’ underperforming styles of supervision. In Chief Davis’ statesman style, he uses his leadership qualities such as his consideration of views of people as well as the subordinates’ in the terms of his decisions. In contrast, Chief Fortier primarily focused on the needs on the internal sphere of his office thereby not taking into consideration of views on a external opinion. He basically ran everything alone. Chief Davis, in his style, allowed the public to get involved with the police department whereas, Chief Fortier stuck to his policies and his department was more of an internal affairs rather than working with the interests of outside sources such as the