Preview

LVMH in the Recession

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2956 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
LVMH in the Recession
http://www.economist.com/node/14447276
LVMH in the recession
The substance of style
The world’s biggest luxury-goods group is benefiting from a flight to quality, but the recession is also prompting questions about the company’s breadth and balance
Sep 17th 2009 | Paris | from the print edition * *
Bloomberg
“THERE are four main elements to our business model—product, distribution, communication and price,” explains an executive at LVMH, the world's largest luxury-goods group. “Our job is to do such a fantastic job on the first three that people forget all about the fourth.” For decades LVMH's formula has worked like a spell: seduced by beautiful status-symbols, perfect shops and clever advertising, millions of people have swooned forgetfully towards the firm's cash registers. At Louis Vuitton, LVMH's star company, the model's pricing power has yielded consistent profit margins of around 40-45%, the highest of any luxury-goods brand.
These days customers are finding it far harder to forget about price. The seriously rich, of course, are still spending freely. But much of the industry's rapid growth in the past decade came from middle-class people, often buying on credit or on the back of rising house prices. According to Luca Solca of Bernstein Research, 60% of the luxury market is now based on demand from “aspirational” customers rather than from the wealthy elite. The recession has quickly reversed the trend to trade up, and people are delaying expensive purchases. Bain & Company, a consulting firm, expects the industry's sales to fall by a tenth in 2009, to €153 billion ($225 billion).
Some executives even expect a lasting shift in customers' preferences, towards discretion and value. Bernard Arnault, chairman and chief executive of LVMH, believes that the whole industry needs to rebrand itself. “The word luxury suggests triviality and showing off, and the time for all that has gone,” he says. Brands which sold “blingy” easy-to-sell

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Coach Inc. Case Analysis

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many of these luxury goods firms aim to maintain their strong brand recognition in the existing markets. The luxury goods industry is said to have few new adopters. Instead of worrying about new competition many of the firms focus on the existing competition within the market. Many of the luxury good brands to are working harder to provide differentiated products from their competition. For instance, Coach, a brand who developed well made leather purses expanded their line of products offered to develop accessories, luggage, and even…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nordstrom Financial Analysis

    • 5459 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Silverstein, Barry. "Can Luxury Brands Sustain Themselves by Becoming Sustainable?" Brandchannel (16 Nov. 2010). Brandchannel.com | Always Branding. Always On. Web. 8 Dec. 2010. .…

    • 5459 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Deluxe: How luxury lost its luster, by Dana Thomas, brings a hard hitting, raw look at the world of luxury and the mass demand of luxury that has occurred. The book was published by the Penguin Group in 2007. Luxury is defined by Thomas as truly special, and was only available to the aristocratic world of wealth and old money in western culture. Luxury signified an experience and lifestyle that denotes royalty, fame, and fortune. However, with large companies owning the former family-owned luxury producing businesses, profits are the main goal not the production of luxury. Thomas reveals the unfortunate demise and rise of traditional luxury companies. Wherever she looked, it seemed as though everyone owned some kind of luxury product. She asked herself, when did brands such as Chanel, Gucci, and Prada become so widely used and available to anyone anywhere? Thus, the beginning of her research into the world of luxury and her book, Deluxe: How luxury lost its luster.…

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Case Study: Aquascutum

    • 3088 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Kapferer, J-N. and Bastien, V. (2009) The Luxury Strategy: break the rules of marketing to build luxury brands. London: Kogan Page.…

    • 3088 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LVMH is a world leader in luxury with a portfolio of over 50 prestigious brands. Brands under the conglomerate (LVMH being the holding company) are synonymous with prestige and elegance and operate in the areas of:…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Coach Case Study

    • 3924 Words
    • 16 Pages

    The luxury industry can also be looked at as a status symbol. Conspicuous consumption leads to increasing demands for luxury good items and it is a growing industry with the global luxury goods market growing 9% per year (Business Wire, 2007). Advertising has a lot to do with it, especially Americans who are being constantly bombarded with advertisements on a daily basis. While finding exactly how many advertisements American see a day is nearly impossible, some studies have shown the number to be between 150 and 3,000 (Mortar, 2006). This leads to more consumers being exposed to or being told which items or brands are luxury goods, but unlike the definition for luxury goods, these conspicuous consumers buy their products for satisfy their self-esteem issues rather than for ease or comfort. Although an argument can be made is…

    • 3924 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Coach Inc

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A luxury brand may have profound influence on an overall product strategy since its position may determine how the company is going to make its next step. A luxury brand like Coach epitomizes elegance and combines classic beauty with modern design. According to John E. Gamble, not only has Coach become one of the most respected and known brand names in the ladies’ handbags and leather accessories luxury brand industry, it is also one of the most best-selling luxury brand companies in the world, with net sales reaching 2.1 billion in 2006 (Gamble). When a company like Coach decides to set up a product strategy for the next season, the manager will need to take the brand’s established style into account, since their incoming products must fit with the existing brand. When a manager, such as Lew Frankfort, chairman and CEO of Coach, Inc., aims to build a luxury brand like Coach, he invests millions of dollars in setting up a series of business strategies, including advertising on television, organizing fashion shows, and gaining the approval of fashion designers. These actions are decided based on how a luxury brand is built; essentially, the brand will guide the future steps of the company to a certain degree. Coach, Inc. is different from other more expensive luxury brands, such as Hermes, Prada, Fendi, and Louis Vuitton in the sense that Coach focuses more on middle-income consumers who want to purchase their hand bags from a price range of $200 to $500. Coach is the alternative to these competing companies, matching their key luxury products on quality and styling, while beating them on price by 50% or more (Gamble).…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Six years after deciding to be an independent public company in late 2000, Coach Inc.’s net sales had grown at a compounded annual rate of 26 percent and the stock price had increased by 1,400 percent due to a strategy keyed to a concept called accessible luxury. Coach crafted the accessible luxury category in women’s handbags and leather accessories by differentiating themselves on price, but matching competitors on styling, quality, and customer service. The accessible luxury strategy mirrors a focus (or market niche) strategy based on low costs. Coach concentrates on a narrow buyer segment and outcompetes rivals by having lower costs than rivals and thus being able to serve niche members at a lower price. Management believed that new products should be based on market research rather than on designers’ instincts. Coach utilized extensive consumer surveys and focus groups to gain insight in the market, and ultimately a competitive advantage over competition. Coach’s $200-$500 handbags appealed to both middle class consumers who now were able to afford a taste of luxury, as well as affluent consumers with the means to spend $2,000 on a handbag on a regular basis.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coach Inc. case analysis

    • 7823 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Luxury goods industry is highly competitive due to a low market-entry barrier. It has experienced ups and downs during the 2000s. And in recent years, the industry has recovered and developed rapidly. More and more luxury goods corporations have expanded their operations in emerging markets through Internet and e-commerce. The future outlook of this industry is optimistic.…

    • 7823 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Burberry Case Study

    • 5112 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Nagasawa, Shin’ya (2008), Luxury Brand Strategy of Louis Vuitton: Graduate school of Commerce, Waseda University Tokyo, Japan.…

    • 5112 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burberry Case

    • 1063 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to Exhibit 13, the respective market shares for Polo, Armani, Gucci, and Burberry are 9.1%, 3.5%, 4.4%, and 5.2%. Coach was not included among the Top 10 Global Luxury Goods Players in general, but specific to accessories, they have an estimated 6% market share compared to Burberry’s 4%. This data illustrates that Burberry is doing quite well. They are one of the Top 5 Global Luxury Goods Players and it appears that they have plenty of room for growth. Unlike many of its other competitors, as mentioned by Rosie Bravo, Burberry has positioned itself as brand that is not only aspirational, but also functional. This best of both worlds quality differentiates Burberry from many of the other players. Under Bravo’s guidance, Burberry now appeals to a wide demographic in terms of age, income, and fashion preferences. However, this might actually be an area of concern because now every firm is a competitor. In essence, Burberry does have a very sustainable competitive position, though it might be wise to shift towards one spectrum (i.e. lifestyle or fashion) instead of straddling between the two.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coach Inc

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Coach incorporated a differentiation focus strategy to make luxury goods (luxury handbags) industry more attractive for itself. Coach entered into agreements with other companies providing rights to them to manufacture and market Coach Brand products. Royalties from such integration helped Coach to boost up their sale by 4 to 5 % in year 2006. The vital part of their business strategy was a business model focusing on frequent launch of their new product which in turn attracted their best customers to visit the stores frequently. This business model was accountable for enormous rise in numbers of handbag sales from 2002 to 2006. “Seventy percent of Coach’s 2006 sales came from products introduced within the fiscal year”(p.106). Coach was specialised for the service to their customer which involved replacement or refurbishment of the handbags without considering the age of the bag. On the other side major competitors weren’t able to cope up with Coach’s service criteria. Promotions through catalogs was their virtuous way of marketing contributed to build brand awareness and also promoted store traffic. The idea of generating revenue from factory stores fortunately became a success business model for Coach. “Coach’s factory stores had outperformed full-price stores in terms of comparable store sales growth during 2005 and 2006, with comparable factory store sales increasing by 31.9 percent during 2006 and comparable full-price store sales increasing by 12.3 percent during the year”(p.109).…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Olympic Delivery Authority (2007) Guide to the Olympic, Paralympic & Legacy transformation planning applications and Olympic village (Part) and legacy residential planning application. Guide to Planning Applications [Online] (February 2007). Available at: http://www.london2012.com/mm%5CDocument%5CPublications%5CPlanningApps%5C01%5C24%5C08%5C36%5Cguide-to-the-planning-applications.pdf [Accessed 26/08/12]…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Burberry Case

    • 2746 Words
    • 11 Pages

    According to industry observers, luxury brands tend fare better than mass market brands during times of economic hardship. It is agreed, that in general luxury products are based on basic…

    • 2746 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the six years following its October 2000 initial public offering (IPO), Coach Inc.’s net sales had grown at a compounded annual rate of 26% and its stock price had increased by 1,400% as a result of a strategy keyed to “accessible” luxury. Coach created the “accessible” luxury category in ladies handbags and leather accessories by matching key luxury rivals on quality and styling, while beating them on price by 50% or more. Not only did Coach’s $200 - $500 handbags appeal to middle income consumers wanting a taste of luxury, but affluent consumers with the means to spend $2,000 or more on a handbag regularly snapped up its products as well. By 2006, Coach had become the best-selling brand of ladies luxury handbags and leather accessories in the U.S. with a 25% market share and was the second best-selling brand of such products in Japan with an 8% market share. Beyond its winning combination of styling, quality, and pricing, the attractiveness of Coach retail stores and high levels of customer service provided by its employees contributed to its competitive advantage. Much of the company’s growth in net sales was attributable to its rapid growth in companyowned stores in the U.S. and Japan. Coach stores ranged from prominent flagship stores on Rodeo Drive and Madison Avenue to factory outlet stores. In fact, Coach’s factory stores had achieved higher comparable store growth during 2005 and 2006 than its full-price stores. At yearend 2006, comparable store sales in Coach factory stores had increased by 31.9% since year-end 2005, while comparable store sales for Coach full price stores experienced a 12.3% year-overyear increase. Coach’s dramatic growth that resulted from its strategy keyed to “accessible luxury” had not gone unnoticed by long-established luxury goods makers. In 2006, most leading designer brands had developed sub-brands that retained the styling and quality…

    • 5116 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics