Preview

LVMH & Warnaco

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
768 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
LVMH & Warnaco
LVMH & Warnaco
1. Calculate ROIC for both companies for fiscal 2011. For calculations requiring a tax rate, assume 33.3% for LVMH (the French corporate rate), and 35% for Warnaco (the U.S. corporate rate). Based on this analysis alone, how do the companies compare in terms of their performance?

LVMH
Warnaco

EUR mil
USD mil

2011 Operating Income
5,154.00
181.50

Tax rate
33.3%
35.0%
[1]
Tax
1,716.28
63.53

NOPAT
3,437.72
117.98

Ending Investment Capital

Total Equity
23,512.00
897.20

+ Long Term Borrowing
4,132.00
208.48
[2] [3]
+ Short Term Borrowing
3,134.00
47.51
[3]
Ending Investment Capital
30,778.00
1,153.19

Beginning Investment Capital

Total Equity
18,204.00
972.61

+ Long Term Borrowing
3,432.00
0
[3]
+ Short Term Borrowing
1,834.00
32.17
[3]
Beginning Investment Capital
23,470.00
1,004.78

2011 Average Investment Capital
27,124.00
1,078.98

ROIC
12.67%
10.93%

Our analysis shows that the ROIC for LVMH and Warnaco are fairly similar – ROIC for LVMH was 12.67% compared to the 10.93% for Warnaco. While we see that LVMH’s operating income is substantially larger than the operating income of Warnaco, the difference in ROIC of 172 basis points shows that the underlying performance of the two companies are much more comparable when taking into account their relative sizes.
When calculating ROIC, we have made a few assumptions, which are noted below:
[1] For calculating Tax, we have started with Operating Income and deducted the respective Income Tax provided in the case for each company. One could argue that a more accurate result could be derived by taking operating profit, subtracting the actual tax on the income statement and then adding back the effective tax on the financial items below the operating income line.
[2] For Warnaco, we have not included "Redeemable Non-controlling interest" in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 1 Assignment 1

    • 4963 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Tax = [(assessable income – deductions) x rate] – offsets ( note there is a order for these) –payg(w) (at the very end +- any levies)…

    • 4963 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From the graphs below, it can be seen that Year 6 (2020) saw a significant increase in ROS over prior years, with an ROS of 14.8%, whereas prior years had produced ROS’ of 3-8%. Year 6’s increase in ROS and related operational efficiency is primarily the result of increased automation to near maximum levels by 2020 as well as the introduction of TQM tactics, which enabled TRAC Team to generate higher Net Income values relative to its sales volumes. Because of TRAC Team’s aggressive and early adaptation of automation and implementation of TQM measures, our ROS of 14.8% in Year 6 was more than double that of any of our competitors, with Erie Company having the next highest ROS of 6.7% in that same year and two other competitors barely breaking 1%.…

    • 7877 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tanglewood Case 1

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Based on information in the case, Tanglewood’s Return on Revenue (ROR) shows to be on top after Kohl. When ROR grows it means that there are fewer expenses incurred for higher net income. Tanglewood’s Return on Assets (ROA) is in second place. This means it has efficiently managed its assets to revenue. Tanglewood should show concern of several competitors like Kohl’s, Federated Dept and Target.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The company’s marginal tax rate is 39 percent. The company’s average tax rate is $107,855/$319,500 = 33.76%.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    LIT1 Task 1

    • 3141 Words
    • 13 Pages

    the business are one in the same the tax rates depend on the type of income brought in.…

    • 3141 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    27% and 26%, respectively. Both companies ' 2005 returns on equity ("ROE 's") are up…

    • 2974 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Accounting for taxes and tax expense is extremely important to the company. Fundamental differences exist between accounting for taxes and the financial reporting of pretax income. Pretax financial income is calculated according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Taxable income is calculated using Internal Revenue Service (IRS) rules (Kieso, Weygandt, & Warfield, 2007). This difference in accounting principles creates a difference between taxable income and income tax payable. This difference results in a deferred tax amount. If the income tax expense is greater than the income tax payable, this results in a deferred tax liability. If the income tax payable is greater than the income tax expense, this results in a deferred tax asset. Deferred tax liabilities and assets cause temporary differences. Temporary differences are carried over into future years and adjustments are made accordingly (Kieso, Weygandt, & Warfield, 2007).…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    IBM Case

    • 1385 Words
    • 36 Pages

    1. Decompose IBM’s ROE (by quarter) and discuss the factors (and trends) that contribute to…

    • 1385 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Harriets Hats

    • 760 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Continuing Operations (before-tax) was $225,000 for 20Y1. The company’s tax rate is 30% for all years presented. Following…

    • 760 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Residual Dividends

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    5. Pay dividend at current rate of 8% or residual dividend. To make this decision their some factor to consider, taxes rates, income interest rate and so on but the most important if you pay at residual dividend is the company can maintain them self at the high percentage. If there growth is going to continue. Is better to pay at a current dividend growth rate at 8%. This way your growth can continue and you own you are able to pay and maintain.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    claw 6026 group assignment

    • 2612 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In order to calculate the taxable income, the relevant assessable income and deductible items should be identified.…

    • 2612 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 7

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. Net Capital for 2011 is calculated the sum of NOWC (already shown as) 134.9 million + Net Fixed Assets (2011 Projected PP&E) of 397.5 = Net Capital for 2011 of = $134.9 + $397.5 = $532.4 million.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Westpac/Nab Comparison

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    WBC has a higher Average ROE of 17.93% compared to NAB’s Average ROE of 16.03% during the 5 year duration period from 2003-2007. This is due to WBC’s ROA of 1.09% being higher than NAB’s ROA of 1.05%. While profitability of WBC is higher than NAB’s, NAB’s financial leverage was greater than WBC’s thus producing a higher ROE. NAB also has a higher Net Income compared to WBC. WBC has a higher Average Expense Multiplier of 16.42 compared to NAB of 15.31 as WBC has lower operating expenses and lower assets compared to NAB.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Accounting Theory: Contemporary Accounting Issues by Evans, accountants have developed two alternative approaches to accounting for income taxes, which are the cash method and the allocation method. The cash method is described as a simple and direct approach. The amount of income taxes actually paid for the year is reported on the Income Statement. The amount comes from the firm 's income tax return and fit is not adjusted in any way. Therefore, the firm 's actual transaction to record its income tax liability is the basis for the amount of the income tax expense reported on the Income Statement. The allocation method is a bit different. The actual amount of tax that is paid in the year is ignored when it comes to reporting income tax expense on the Income Statement. The amount of income tax expense reported on the Income Statement is based on the on the income tax rate that the firm pays, which is applied to the amount of pretax income. This makes the Income Statement perfectly consistent with the before-tax income. Using the allocation method makes it look like all items on the Income Statement based on the same method.…

    • 1889 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hertz Lbo

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How much value do you expect to be created by operating improvements and capital structure changes envisioned by CD&R?…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics