Preview

Lysis & Socrates: What Is Friendship?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1203 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lysis & Socrates: What Is Friendship?
Lysis & Socrates: What is friendship?

In this dialogue between Socrates, Lysis, and Lysis’ best friend Menexenus, Socrates is trying to show Hippothales that the way to attract attention from someone is NOT by praising them, but by drawing them into a philosophical discussion. He claims that praising them (especially young people) will only make them bigheaded, and that developing their mind & soul with deep conversation is the right way to draw their attention. Socrates shows this by starting a debate with Lysis and Menexenus about friendship. From the get-go Socrates suggests to Lysis that his parents love him, and in Greek the word for love is related to the word for friendship. So, what is friendship, and under what conditions does it exist?

The first question Socrates poses is to Menexenus and is as follows: “When someone loves someone else, which of the two becomes the friend of the other, the one who loves or the one who is loved? Or is there no difference” (Plato, 212b). Menexenus claims there to be no difference at all, and it is possible for two people to be friends if only one loves the other. Socrates disagrees, saying it is possible for one to love the other but not e loved in return, and possibly even hated in return. If this is the case, is the lover the friend of the loved or vice-versa? Or can they not be friends because they do not both love each other in return? Menexenus agrees with the latter, meaning his thoughts of love and friendship have been questioned and even changed a little.

Now, Socrates decides to take the discussion in a different direction. He turns to a quote from the poets, “God always draws the like unto the like” (Plato, 214). The poets are saying that God is the one who makes people friends. However, Socrates reasons to the idea that if this were true (that like is friends with like) then that would mean that evil would be friends with evil (because they are the same). This cannot be true because if

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    There is a runaway trolley barreling down the railway tracks. Ahead on the tracks there are five people tied up and unable to move. The trolley is headed straight for them. You are some distance off the tracks on a footbridge standing next to a very large or fat man; we will call him the portly fella. You can push the man off the bridge, and his body will fall onto the tracks and stop the trolley from killing the five people, but will kill the portly fella. You have two options: (1) Do nothing and let the trolley kill the five people. (2) Push the man onto the tracks, where it is likely to kill the one person. What would you do in this situation? Push the portly fella, or just watch as the five people on the tracks reach their own demise.…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Character

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page

    such a great friend. Plato and his friends considered Socrates like a figure of their father…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates rises the dilemma about what pious is and do the gods love something because it is pious, or is something pious because the gods love it? Socrates and Euthyphro both agree that surely the gods love the pious because it is the pious. But than Socrates argues that we are forced to reject the second option: the fact that the gods love (something) cannot explain why the pious is the pious. This is because, if both options were true, they would go in circles with the gods loving the pious because it is the pious, and the pious being the pious because the gods love it. And this in turn means, Socrates argues, that the pious is not the same as the god-beloved, because what makes the pious the pious is not what makes the god-beloved the god-beloved. After all, what makes the god-beloved the god-beloved is the fact that the gods love it, whereas what makes the pious the pious is something else. Thus Euthyphro's theory does not give us the very nature of the pious.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another good Socrates valued was love. Some people say that Socrates was not a lover as he did not love his children. In ‘The Trial and Death of Socrates’ it is evident that he leaves his children behind and even asks the jurymen to test his own children when they grow up. It seems cruel to leave behind his children and even have them tested. To the majority, it seems that Socrates do not love. However, this is not true. Socrates has a different idea of love compared to the majority’s idea of love. Majority thinks that caring and being there for one another is love, but that kind of love dies out with death. According to Diotima in the ‘Symposium’ love is the appreciation of beauty. Socrates wanted to give this Diotima’s love to his children…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The most intriguing people you will encounter in this life are the people who had insights about you, that you didn't know about yourself” (Alder). This quote can be used to show why the great Greek philosopher, Socrates is deemed as being so intriguing. During his time, Socrates was seen as a great threat because he tended to break free from the normal way of thinking and inevitably, people became afraid of him. Socrates was eventually put to death on account of “corrupting the youth” and being an “atheist,” which were false claims against him to cover up the fact that his accusers simply didn’t like him or his ways. When reading Plato’s Republic, Socrates is shown as being very intriguing because of: his humble ways, his Socratic method,…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Euthypyro

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The main argument of Socrates is that being loved by gods and god-loved is not the same as the pious. They are the affects and qualities. I think, Socrates want to emphasize active and passive voice. He firstly talks about something loving and something loved. In case of something loved, there is one who loves. In that point, he argues “being loved” and says that “it is being loved because it is pious, but it is not pious because it is being loved.”(10-d)…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates is known as the lover of wisdom and the lover of beauty. His speech is a response to Agathon who comically states that love is beautiful and young, the opposite of Socrates. Socrates inquires is love considered to be a love of something or of nothing? He compares that to how a father is a father to his children and a brother is a brother to his siblings. Socrates expresses that love’s desire suggests that one does not own what he or she loves. Socrates further explains this by giving the example of a healthy man having the desire to remain healthy. One’s desire for things is for the future. The desire rests in the preservation and not the lack thereof. This statement of love being a love of something shows that there is a connection…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay I am evaluating if Socrates death harmed the citizens of Athens more then it did Socrates himself. Socrates has two reasons why Athens will be more harmed then him by his death. When Socrates died he did just that, he left the earth and was no longer there, after this moment Socrates was no longer harmed by his own death, the people of Athens however went on to suffer the repercussions for years to come. It was Athens in the end that suffered, Socrates was at peace.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Diotima

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the course of the speech, Socrates describes love based upon an interaction with a woman named Diotima. After explaining to Socrates that good and bad and beautiful and ugly are more of a grey concept as opposed to a clear cut concept, she tells Socrates that love is a “great spirit” whose purpose is to fill the unknown space between humans and gods. Diotima then tells Socrates of the origin of Love, following Aphrodite’s birth, and how it relates to Love’s parents, the Penia, the embodiment of poverty, and Poros, the cunning and beautiful son of Metis. Additionally, she explains love as a cycle of continuous birth and death. She explains to Socrates that love is neither wise, nor ignorant which further illustrates her claim of love’s equivocalness.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates made his defenses against accuses in the dialogue of Apology. In his own way, he organizes his statements together in the first two sentences of the dialogue. He expresses his opinions through the sentences; He shows his attitudes towards to the jury men; He also introduced that he would state how the accusers affected the jury men in a negative way.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates Beliefs

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates is a man who deeply believes in his teachings. To search for truth in your beliefs leads to virtuous beliefs. It would not have been virtuous to flee the trial. IF you read his speech you see that he wanted them to learn from this trail. He wanted them to know that these charges were brought by vengeful people and that they were a lie. He believed that the jurors would see the truth in his statement. He did not take money for his time, he did not incite the young men (they did that for themselves). He talks about his wisdom and that the only wisdom he has is knowing he has no wisdom.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conversation between Socrates and Alcibiades continues with them talking about how the soul is separate from the body. There is nothing that has more authority than the soul within the body. Socrates then states that people who know their parts of the body know what belongs the them, but not themselves. This means that their body parts are for their bodies, but they body parts do not belong to the soul. Again. Socrates brings up that people who tend to their bodies tend to what belongs to them rather than what belongs to themselves. This helps Socrates bring up the point that the person who loves the body is someone who who loved something that belonged to the body, but Socrates is the one who loves Alcibiades’ soul and not his body. Love is loving another person’s soul as long as they are making progress. The person who loves Alcibiades soul will not leave him unlike the people who love the body. Socrates will love him unless he became corrupt and ugly. The body changes and the soul continues to grow. Socrates points out that he is…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phaedrus's Second Speech

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the second speech, Socrates is the one speaking. He starts out by weaving a story of a young man who has a cunning lover that deceives the young man into thinking that his lover does not love him (237b). He decides to first define the meaning of love. ‘Love is a form of desire’ (237d) but both the lover and non-lover engage in desire so there must be a dividing factor. There are two forces which rule and guide men: an “inborn desire for pleasures” and an “acquired judgment that pursues what is best” (237d). These forces interact with each other and when desire is in control, it leads to excess and when the judgement is in control, it leads to moderation (237e&238a).…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates World Views

    • 1543 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The goal of this paper is to discern and construct the world views of Socrates through the various readings, lectures and videos that we have seen in class. Some of these sources include: Socrates by G. Rudebusch; excerpts from The Last Days of Socrates by Plato; and The Allegory of a Cave. Of the nine world views covered in class, I will delve into my interpretation of four of them as seen through the various sources that we have been exposed to in class. These four world views will include Death, Condition, Solution and Morality. Finally, I will use my understanding of the world *views assessment to critique Socrates’ view of morality.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    African American

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Friendship is a virtue or at least involves virtue. Friendship is always a special thing but people tend to forget about how much its value is. Friendship is not just necessary, but also noble.Friendship consists of goodwill between two people. You can only have a few friends being that its take some precious time to build a real friendship. Aristotle’s speaks about how there are three kinds of friendship. The first is friends of utility, where both people receive some benefit from each other. Aristotle believed that this is the type of friendship that is for the old. Aristotle argued that they “are at such a time of life pursue not what is pleasant but what is beneficial.” The second is friends of pleasure, where both people are attracted to each other, good looks, or other their pleasant qualities all together . aristotles says this friendship is for the young. Aristotle argues that the young because “...quickly become friends and quickly stop...” and “...love and stop loving quickly...” The third is friends of excellence, where both people admire the other’s excellence and help one another strive for excellence. Aristotle says this about friends of excellence “...complete sort of friendship between people who are good and alike in virtue...”friends of virtue or excellence is hard to come by especially in the world we live in today because it is so much individualism. According to Aristotle the first two friendships are accidental, because in these case friends are only thinking about their own utility and pleasure, not are going to change over a period of time. If a friendship is based on excellence it will be a long lasting relationship, because excellence is a quality. This kind of friendship is the one everyone wants to have and it overlooks the other two friendships. This kind of friendship though is hard to find and takes a lot of time to progress but it is worth it. It is nothing like having a real and true friend. Friends who want the same thing will…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics