Preview

Machiavelli And Lao Tzu Comparison Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
924 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli And Lao Tzu Comparison Essay
Nick Cramer
Mr. Cramer
Honors English III
29 August 2013
Compare and Contrast Essay
Loved or Feared, but Not Despised
Two leaders by the names of Lao Tzu and Niccolo Machiavelli had two opinions on how one should lead their people. To be a leader, one must guide in the way they think is the best way to live. As humans, love and fear is something that surrounds us in our day to day life. Some, like Lao Tzu prefer to show love and to be loved, while some, like Niccolo Machiavelli, have the preference to be feared. To be loved means to be cherished, and that was Lao Tzu’s goal as a leader. To be feared means to be frightened, just like Niccolo Machiavelli was viewed. Lao Tzu and Niccolo Machiavelli share their common differences, but also
…show more content…

Taoism, according to the dictionary was a philosophical system recommending a life of complete simplicity and naturalness and of noninterference with the course of natural events, in order to attain a happy existence in harmony. Lao Tzu was a believer in spontaneous order. Lao Tzu said “Practice not doing, and everything will fall into place”, Lao Tzu believed that the world was in prefect order, and when men tried to disrupt, change, or govern, they would mess the order of the world up (Tzu 3). Lao Tzu believed that committing to doing nothing was governing at its best. He believed that a well-governed people are free, with the freedom of decision, the freedom to achieve, and the freedom to live. Lao Tzu also emphasizes what virtues a ruler must possess, rather than step by step instructions of what to do. Lao Tzu was anti-materialistic, including the lack of wealth, and power. He believed being anti-materialistic was vital to being a good leader. Last of all, Lao Tzu said “Next best is a leader who is loved”, so above all, be non-existent; but next is be loved (Tzu 3). He was a leader that said to be compassionate with yourself for the benefit of others. To summarize Lao Tzu, one could say that he was a leader that was fond of the idea of spontaneous order, a leader that emphasized to be anti-materialistic, and a leader that puts his people before himself. A leader that may differ from Lao Tzu goes by the name of Niccolo …show more content…

They both believed that having leaders was essential to a country. Without leaders there would be no order, which could lead to chaos. They both share the idea of being despised is never better than being feared, or loved. If one is despised, no one will follow their ways, which creates a bad leader. Lao Tzu and Niccolo Machiavelli both value their beliefs, and believe that their way is the right way, and that there is no other way. They both see life simple for their people because they have provided a way of life for everyone to live by. If all of their people followed their ways, they believe that life will be simple and free. Similarities are sometimes hard to find, but Niccolo Machiavelli and Lao Tzu share a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Perhaps the most distinct differences between Machiavelli's and Lao-Tzu's are their beliefs in how a government should be run. Whereas Machiavelli writes about the qualities a prince should have while instilling a totalitarian government, Lao-Tzu strongly believes that one cannot have total control, so everything should run its course.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Daoism: philosophical system developed by Lao-tzu and Chuang-tzu advocating a simple honest life and noninterference with the course of natural events…

    • 2526 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao-tzu and Machiavelli are political philosophers writing in two different lands and two different times. Lao-tzu was an ancient Chinese philosopher from 6th century BC, the author of Tao-te Ching, and Machiavelli was an Italian philosopher who lived 2000 years after Lao-tzu's time, author of Prince. They are both philosophers but have totally different perspective on how to be a good leader. While both philosopher's writing is instructive. Lao-tzu's advice issues from detached view of a universal ruler; Machiavelli's advice is very personal perhaps demanding. Both philosophers' idea will not work for today's world, because that modern world is not as perfect as Lao-tzu described in Tao-te Ching, and not as chaotic as Machiavelli illustrated in Prince.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lao-Tzu vs. Machiavelli

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Lao-tzu’s view is government should not have optimal power over the people He feels as though the less people know they are being governed, the happier they will be. For example, in the Tao-te Ching Lao-tzu states, “If you want to be a great leader,/ you must learn to follow the Tao./ Stop trying to control./Let go of fixed plans and concepts,/ and the world will govern itself.” (Verse 57)…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The Master leads by emptying people’s mind and filling their cores, by weakening their ambition and toughening their resolve. He helps people lose everything they know, everything they desire, and creates confusion in those who think that they know.” (Page 19). This passage supports a number of readings. All of them centered on government. The definition of government is the organization, machinery, or agency through which a political unit exercises authority and performs functions and which is usually classified according to the distribution of power within it. Peter Bondanella insinuated, “The twentieth century has contributed a number of important…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is obvious to most people the differences between black and white, light and darkness, or Pepsi and Coca-Cola. Many people have different preferences for each of these things, as well as different views about them. While one person may argue that Pepsi is the ultimate cola beverage, another person may claim that Coca-Cola is the best by far. This is such the case with many different people in this world, on many different topics. A prime example of contrasting views on many issues is Niccolio Machiavelli and Lao Tzu. Among the issues that they address include war and violence and the qualities of an ideal ruler.…

    • 743 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu have very different aspects about how a prince should govern his people. Machiavelli dwells over the fact, whether it is better to be loved or feared. He believes that the…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lao-Tzu Vs Machiavelli

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Reading the works of Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu in succession highlight how truly at opposition the messages are.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli vs. Lao-Tzu

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In comparing and contrasting the governmental philosophies of the great thinkers Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli, I have found a pleasant mix of both of their ideas would be the best for America today. Lao-Tzu's laisse-faire attitude towards the economy, as well as his small scale military is appealing to my liberal side, while Machiavelli's attitude towards miserliness which causes low taxes appeals to the right wing. These great thinkers contradict the popular saying "all great thinkers think alike." They have several ideas, such as taxes, that are the same, while other ideas, like the involvement of government in citizens' everyday lives are totally opposite. I shall start with the ideas of Machiavelli, then move on to Lao-Tzu's, and finally a comparison and application into American life. Niccolo Machiavelli believes in a strong government. The leader should be strong and feared. I believe he gets this idea from the fear of God; no one is supposed to question God because he is so feared, and in the same sense, no one should question a strong leader. Machiavelli realizes that the leader should be feared, but not hated. A hated leader will probably be killed in a rebellion. One also can not be loved. Any compassion towards your citizens will make them believe you are weak, and they will rebel. He thinks a very strong military is necessary at all times, and that powerful arms should be available and in hand. This idea is similar to that of right wing America and our friends, the National Rifle Association, who believe assault rifles are America's pastime. The nation should always be prepared for war, and should always be searching for new lands to conquer. This is much like our cold war with the USSR and the new lands to conquer would be anything Communist. These wars should go on without high taxes. High taxes as well cause rebellion. Case in point: the high taxes levied against America by the British, as well as other strong factors, led to the American revolution. He…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The prince may gain power, but not glory. He gains esteem and glory through his courage. He must have wisdom to choose the least risky venture and act on it courageously and wisdom in picking his advisors. It is extremely important to gain the support of the people because you will need it in times of trouble. It also takes that same courage and wisdom to keep up the morale of his people during those troubled times. That is why a prince needs to relate to his people. He does not have to be loved by the people, but he must not be hated and should always be respected. However, Machiavelli makes a powerful case that it is better for a leader to be feared than loved. He feels that men respond more strongly to fear than love. Fear is constant, but love of the people can easily change. The prince cannot make people love him, but he has control over his people’s fear of him. Therefore, the course of action that the prince can best control is what he should pursue. In answering the question of whether it is better to be loved than feared, Machiavelli writes, “The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao-Tzu Vs Machiavelli

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Both Lao-tzu and Machiavelli seem to have a clear-cut view on how they believe the government should run. In some ways, both men have very similar ideas; more often, though, they couldn't be more opposed. A few similarities brought forth are that people in power must not strive to make everyone happy, nor must they be considered unmerciful and they should avoid being despised. The final view they both share is that they believe if the common people think they are happy, then whomever is in power will not fear for their power. However, it seems for each similarity they have, several oppositions occur in their place. From the way they believe how a leader should govern, especially in times of war, to the way that they feel about simple lies shows us how different Lao-tzu and Machiavelli's opinions really are.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao Tze VS Plato

    • 1137 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plato and Lao Tze first agree in their method of selecting leaders. In "The Allegory of the Cave" by Plato, it is suggested that leaders be selected by a method in which only the greatest minds are allowed to be come leaders. This sentiment is paralleled in Lao Tze's "Tao Te Ching." Both writings believe leaders should be enlightened philosophically. Plato states, "Whereas if they go to the administration of public affairs, poor and hungering after their own private advantage, thinking that hence they are to snatch the chief good, order there can never be; for they will be fighting about office, and the civil and domestic broils which thus arise will be the ruin of the rulers themselves and of the whole State." Lao Tze reinforces this thought, in Chapter 81, with "So the sage does not serve himself; / The more he does for others, the more he is satisfied; / The more he gives, the more he receives. / Nature flourishes at the expense of no one; / So the sage benefits all men and contends with none." Secondly, both Plato and Lao Tze believe that those who are meant to be leaders should be leaders. Plato writes, "And will our pupils, when they hear this, refuse to take their turn at the toils of State, when they are allowed to spend the greater part of their time with one another in the heavenly light? Impossible, he answered; for they are just men, and the commands which we impose upon them are just; there can be no doubt that every one of…

    • 1137 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ming Dynasty Essay

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Taoism or “Daoism” were widely spread throughout the Ming dynasty. Taoism can be defined as a philosophical ideology of a polytheistic…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Confucianism, Daoism, and Legalism were 3 philosophies. They all had a different way of teaching but all of them wanted to end the conflicts in China. In Confucianism everyone had a rule that they had to follow. Confucius believed that well organized society need to have younger ones respect the elders and their parents. Good government and social order should be based on a strong relationship in the family. It also believes that education was important for self and society. Daoism (Taoism) is all about interacting with the society and the world as it already is. Daoism is the understanding of how the world actually works, as in reality isn’t always what we expect. Legalism believed in punishments to maintain social orders and the “free” thinkers with their ideas shouldn’t be spread and should be under the government’s control. They also believed a powerful government is the key to organized society/social order.…

    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chuang Tzu's Perfect Man

    • 1291 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Chuang Tzus ideal person has discovered the Tao, or Way. The Tao can be described as the underlying unity that embraces man, Nature, and all that is in the universe. This manner of living involves a central message of freedom, from both the material world and traditional, rational thought. By following the Way, the true sage can attain an existence liberated from worldly constraint and live in peaceful harmony with nature.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays