Preview

Machiavelli the Prince

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
10718 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli the Prince
Chapters I–IV - THE PRINCE
Summary — Chapter I: The Kinds of Principalities and the Means by Which They Are Acquired
Machiavelli describes the different kinds of states, arguing that all states are either republics or principalities. Principalities can be divided into hereditary principalities and new principalities. New principalities are either completely new or new appendages to existing states. By fortune or strength, a prince can acquire a new principality with his own army or with the arms of others.
Summary — Chapter II: Hereditary Principalities
Chapter II is the first of three chapters focusing on methods to govern and maintain principalities. Machiavelli dismisses any discussion of republics, explaining that he has "discussed them at length on another occasion"—a reference to Book 1 of his Discourses.
Machiavelli notes that it is easier to govern a hereditary state than a new principality for two main reasons. First, those under the rule of such states are familiar with the prince's family and are therefore accustomed to their rule. The natural prince only has to keep past institutions intact, while adapting these institutions to current events. Second, the natural disposition of subjects in a hereditary state is to love the ruling family, unless the prince commits some horrible act against his people. Even if a strong outsider succeeds in conquering a prince's hereditary state, any setback the outsider encounters will allow the prince to reconquer the state.
Summary — Chapter III: Mixed Principalities
Machiavelli explains why maintaining a new principality is more difficult than maintaining a hereditary state. In the first place, people will willingly trade one recently arrived ruler for another, hoping that a new ruler will be better than the present one. This expectation of improvement will induce people to take up arms against any relatively unestablished prince. Although the people may quickly realize that their revolt is ineffective,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Early modern Western Europe faced political changes from 1500-1750. These were based on three main political ideas: monarchy, balance of power, and religious reforms. The main type of government became monarchies, which had one main ruler and a parliament. The parliament was a group of state-elected legislatures, used to represent the citizens. Document five, Political Craft and Craftiness on page 420-421, explains the qualities that Machiavelli thought that a prince should have to be a proper prince. In the past, empires had one ruler and that was it, which meant that the citizens had no say in what was going on in the government. This made the process of law-making more fair than if just one person were making all of the decisions. Balance…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince examines how to acquire and maintain power of a nation. Machiavelli states that nations are either republics or principalities. The four types of principalities are hereditary, new, mixed and ecclesiastical. Hereditary principalities occur when the prince inherits the nation from his ancestors. Hereditary states experience fewer difficulties compared to newer states because they are accustomed to the family of the prince. New Principalities are acquired either by the power of others, one’s own power, luck, or ability. New Principalities are either accustomed to the rule of a prince or was a free state. When a prince conquers a free state it threatens the people’s lifestyle and customs. Therefore, the people…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of Machiavelli’s standards for rulers of a country is to be focused on warfare by claiming, “A prince ought to have no other aim or thought, nor select…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is because it is only one mandate that people would have to follow and not those from lower nobles. In chapter four he gives an example of two kingdoms, where one was ruled only by one person who is able to hold their mandate more easily than the other one that has nobles, who also have their own privileges too, and their nobles can overturn against the kingdom. For instance, the kingdom that is ruled by one person is more solid without finding any possible “malcontents” to want to take over the government (Machiavelli 15-17). He analyzed the pros and cons of different kingdoms to have their final conclusion. In chapter six he introduces the word “virtu“ that is a set of nouns that represented what kind of skills the new ruler should have, that is wisdom, strategy, bravery, strength, and ruthlessness . “Those who become rulers through strength of purpose [vie virtuose], as they did, acquire their kingdoms with difficulty, but they hold on with ease (Machiavelli 19). He identifies that the worst ruler is the one who is opposed to the people or makes them feel any kind of fear, and if that is happening, the ruler would have a lack of support from their people who can also go against the ruler (Machiavelli 33). He gives an important point of why a ruler should always stay in good terms with their followers. “Anyone who becomes a ruler with the support of the populace ought to ensure he keeps their…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The model Machiavelli presents begins with a society in a 'state of nature' or 'Anarchy' that exists until the people begin to realise strength in numbers and seek leadership from the foremost individual who assumes rulership, thus evolving into a 'Monarchy'.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Writing one of the most acclaimed books of all time must not have been easy; not one bit. Stating that, the fact that Frederick Douglas, among many others, is capable of criticizing Machiavelli and his genius work on The Prince, really infuriates me. Unconsciously, Niccolo Machiavelli became one of the first and most important philosophical leaders of all time after writing The Prince. Although The Prince is considered one of the greatest pieces of political theory in history, it is not always looked upon favorably, and a clear example of this comes from Frederick the Great. In 1739, Frederick the Great wrote a severe critique of The Prince entitled Refutation of The Prince of Machiavelli in which he expressed that he thought “Machiavelli corrupted politics, and in doing so hoped to destroy the very percepts of sound morality”. This is an idea with which I don’t particularly side with.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There were many transitions throughout history in terms of politics. One example is the United States, who went from having a king on the other side of the world to a president leading them in their own country. Another example is Germany, who went from having a horrible dictatorship to gaining a president who would look to help the country rebuild after a devastating war. Now I could come up with many other examples of historical transitions, but none are as important as the transition from the origin of politics and its theory in ancient Greece and how it can be led by a group of wise philosophers to one 16th century Italian man's new ideas about how a country could be lead through a born into power prince. In this paper, I will be discussing how an important work of Niccolo Machiavelli…

    • 1832 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jessica B

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since all governments are either republics or principalities, Machiavelli noted, their people will be accustomed either to managing their own affairs or to accepting the leadership of a prince. (For that reason, the safest princes are those who inherit their rule over people used to the family.) A wise leader, however, will be able to assume problems long before they actually arise, using virtù to forestall what would otherwise be great difficulties. Whatever vitality a former republic may have, then, Machiavelli counselled that it either be destroyed or ruled carefully by a resident prince.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli Eassy

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Machiavelli differs from the many political theorists who offer conceptions of a “natural state,” a presocial condition arising solely from human instinct and character. But while Machiavelli never puts forth a vision of what society would be like without civil government, he nonetheless presents a coherent, although not particularly comprehensive, vision of human nature.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prince Notes

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Machiavelli explains why maintaining a new principality is more difficult than maintaining a hereditary state.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Prince

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The Prince” originally written for princes and rulers is a book written with monarchies in mind, describing how to rule in all different varieties of monarchies; from dynasties to newly developing monarchies. This book also goes into great detail of how to maintain existing monarchies or how to conquer and keep them under your rule. Older monarchies or dynasties are tougher to conquer and keep because if you cannot win the hearts of the people they will rebel to restore power to their beloved leader they watched grow in front of their eyes. Once conquered you must remember to have the people be partial to your conduct. You can rule with an iron fist or a soft heart but you must show strength while being sensitive to the people you now rule. This is very important as your army is never as strong as the people you conquer and you will need them on your side when to control you new land. When Louis the XII took over Milan he made this same mistake along with a few others that Machiavelli goes into detail about. When Louis conquered the land he promised the people of Milan that he will be a great leader and that they needed him. Once in power the people were not impressed and overthrew his rule to bring back their existing ruler. The people of Milan found that the grass was not greener and wanted to get things back to the way they were. Machivelli also speaks about that when taking over a foreign land that is unknown to you, you must move to that land to offset any upheaval. Moving to the land will give the people faith in you as a rule and will let you deal with any discrepancies face to face. If you cannot move to the land you must consider colonizing the land by taking the land from the people and giving to your own. Colonization will upset the natives but they will be powerless with no land or money from that land. You now have the power to make your colony strong while making your neighbors weaker (thus as the Romans did). If you do not colonize…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    cj2k

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The most important comparison to be made is that between prowess and fortune. Obtaining a state through prowess is clearly more demanding than benefiting from simple good luck. But a prince gifted with his own prowess is possessed of a strong foundation to maintain that rule, whereas fortune is unpredictable and may lead as easily to a prince’s deposition as it had to his rise. Thus, maintaining rule is much easier when a prince has used his own skill. Because the maintenance of rule is most important to Machiavelli, he concludes that prowess is a better route to become a prince. A second comparison might be made between criminal and constitutional means of achieving power. Here, the main point of difference is not the skill and experience of the prince but popular attitudes toward the prince. A prince who comes to power through crime runs the greatest risk because he may be forced to commit some cruelty toward his subjects, endangering himself by breeding hatred and resentment among the populace. A constitutional prince, however, comes to power with the support of either the nobles or commoners, and his job consists mainly of keeping the unsupportive group satisfied with his rule.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the start principalities and republics have been discussed as two types of states. Principalities can be further classified as one which is coming through generations i.e. inherited and the other one is newly acquired. The new principalities can be, either acquired through strength or luck, added to the old ones or can be set up as a new one. Theses principalities can be under the rule of prince or can be as a free land. The principalities running down in heritage are comparatively easier to maintain and the prince’s rule tends to be stable because of the norms and culture being followed there.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I am arguing that even if people will be the cause of disorder, the big influence is the leader on the country he is controlling the state, and should not let the nation to go under disorder and chaos because at the end the leaders are the one who decide. Also, Machiavelli believed that it’s the prince's responsibility to lead his state into order and give the stability to his people. The characteristics of an excellent prince are being respected and feared, good virtues, and intelligent.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays