Preview

Machiavelli The Prince Rhetorical Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
974 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli The Prince Rhetorical Analysis
Machiavelli isn’t necessarily a teacher of evil because of his courtesy to educate others about past history and persuade people to think differently. We are shown from the Prince that although Machiavelli does have an admiration for ones fortune and skill (virtue). Although there is a set of controversial approaches that he tries to suede people in a position of power to adjust themselves. With this we can learn that although there is to be some success in the mist of violence shown through his teachings it shows that although it is unnecessary and will cause the people who are innocent to retaliate against their administration. Machiavelli also mentions some key past princes who have misused their power.
It’s explored theme suggest that …show more content…
These vary from faithfulness, charity and self-preservation. Though he gives us these characteristics, he explains why a prince needs to look charitable while scouring for opportunities to flaunt his authority. This soon leads to him encouraging rulers that they should not ignore obvious imperfections like deception and cruelty when it could potentially profit for ones government. In Contrast Machiavelli appears to have some trouble esteeming his self-description of cruelty and shows why it should be pardon but at the same time he criticizes it. It’s clear that he can give us one example of his approval on how a prince ruled effectively and two individuals who should not be …show more content…
He mentions an orphan named Oliverotto da Fermo who was born during Pope Alexander VI’s reign. During his time developing skills to rule he was enrolled into military school and though he wasn’t enthusiastic about it at first, he saw the concept of virtue by rising above the ranks to obtain power and fortune. Furthermore we could see that he begins to take advantage of his fortune and skills by setting up a trap through his uncle and uses his men to detain citizens of the town and government officials. This act results in him killing important government officials and quickly taking
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A Comparison of the Writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu
    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Comparison of the Writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Prince Rhetorical Analysis
    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Prince Rhetorical Analysis

    Leaders of countries or Princes must make decisions that not many will agree with, but are the best for the populace and he must make them, no matter the cost. Niccolo Machiavelli uses logos, ethos and distinct clear diction to prove the necessity for a ruler to be able to make unpopular decisions, in an excerpt from his book “the Prince” (1532).…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's Influence On The Prince
    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Machiavelli's Influence On The Prince

    Contrary to popular belief, Machiavelli is not a diabolic political figure in search of power. He is instead an astute politician who uses his extensive knowledge of politics to analyze various princes and principalities in order to educate future…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli The Prince Rhetorical Analysis
    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Machiavelli The Prince Rhetorical Analysis

    Machiavelli states that a prince would be praiseworthy by many if he could achieve the fifteen virtues and vices that Machiavelli lists off in chapter fifteen. After, however, he writes, "But because he cannot have them, nor wholly, observe them, since human, conditions do not permit it, it is necessary for him to be so prudent as to know how to avoid the infamy of those vices that would take his state from and to be on guard against those that do not, if that is possible; but if one cannot, one can let them go on with less hesitation."( pg. 62, lines 9-15) Machiavelli writes that it is important for a prince to recognize virtu and act virtuously but not…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Qualities Of A Prince Rhetorical Analysis
    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Qualities Of A Prince Rhetorical Analysis

    Aristotle came up with a persuasive pattern we see in media all over called, rhetorical appeals. Ethos, logos, and pathos are seen in various types of media, ads, magazines, and many more. In “The Qualities of a Prince” an excerpt by Niccolò Machiavelli, he informs us about how a prince is able to hold his title and position and how to maintain the power that he has over the people. He uses past experiences for examples on how to maintain power. In Capitalism: A Love Story by Michael Moore, he tries to incorporate the rhetorical appeals into his argument about power. In order to use these appeals he shows how the government has abused capitalism and gains the viewers trust by using persuasive patterns. Each…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli The Prince Rhetorical Analysis
    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page

    Machiavelli The Prince Rhetorical Analysis

    In this excerpt of The Prince, Niccolò Machiavelli argues that a good prince should be more concerned with maintaining the security of the state than with morality and ethics, pointing out that, although an ideal prince would be perfect in every way, ideal princes don’t exist. So a prince must therefore choose which qualities to regard in higher terms. Machiavelli uses as an example of this the quandary of whether ‘tis better to be feared or loved, saying that being feared is better (though not unto the point of hatred), because people are inherently bad, and fear of punishment is a stronger motivator than desire to be good. A prince, he says, must master the arts of deception and cunning; not only should he have a lion’s courage but a fox’s…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Prince Rhetorical Analysis
    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Prince Rhetorical Analysis

    Metaphors are an important ingredient to speech and argument. It is used to show comparison between two things, a way to create new meaning. Niccolò Machiavelli in his book The Prince discuss of social and political along with his creative usage of metaphors. His ideas consist of Medicine, the Fox and the Lion, as well as The Archer. These are the metaphors that I will be discussing as we go in more debt about Machiavelli and James Kastely thoughts of argument. Machiavelli on the other hand may have used these metaphors as arguments. He does not imply it directly, but his twist and turns of his writing may be comparable to Kastely arguments about "rendering the indeterminate determinate" but not quite so with the…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli The Prince Rhetorical Analysis
    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Machiavelli The Prince Rhetorical Analysis

    Throughout The Prince, there is a certain academic tone to Niccolò Machiavelli's writing, and the presentation of his theories and observations is extremely pragmatic. In consequence, it was surprising when, in chapter 25, Machiavelli began to speak, quite frankly, about the role of fate and fortune in a principality, saying that, "...fortune is arbiter of half of our actions, but also that she leaves the other half, or close to it, for us to govern" (98). This at first glance appears to be a far more fanciful notion than the ones that Machiavelli had previously maintained. However, as we delve deeper into Machiavelli's work, we are soon able to realize that there are underlying connections to fortunes role – as well as what our own reprisal ought to be – all throughout the text.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince: Christian Humanism
    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Machiavelli's The Prince: Christian Humanism

    In Machiavelli’s The Prince, he tackles of issues in society and the government as a whole. Machiavelli believed a good ruler is one that could give justice and provide some type of order to his citizens. He believed that a good ruler should focus more on the present rather than what could be. Machiavelli used several examples to demonstrate his way of thinking in a humanistic way and running a government. He used the fox and the lion for an example. A good ruler should be able to use cunningness and brute force per situation in which it is called for. Machiavelli believes that there are two ways of fighting something, that is by law or by force and he believed those are…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's Attitude Toward Mankind
    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Machiavelli's Attitude Toward Mankind

    In Machiavelli’s most famous book, he writes to prospective “new princes” on how to be as successful as possible, without taking into account the morality of any of the actions. For example, in chapter 15, he writes that “it is necessary for a prince, if he wishes to maintain himself, to learn to be able to not be good, and to use it and not use it according to necessity” (Machiavelli 93). In addition, he also believed that men were generally to receive misfortune as they “[were generally] ungrateful, fickle, hypocrites, and dissemblers, evaders of danger, lovers of gain” (Machiavelli 101). He believed that during good times, man would likely seek to be friends with fellow neighbors but that in times of adversity, they would only seek out their own well being and be selfless even if one had previously given them a favor. For this reason, he supports the fact that a prince is better off being feared than loved showing pessimism in the nature of humans. He writes, “Love endures by a bond which men, being scoundrels, may break whenever it serves their advantage to do so; but fear is supported by the dread of pain, which is ever present” (Machiavelli 106). Machiavelli supported keeping people in fear to better control them.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli vs. Castiglione
    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Machiavelli vs. Castiglione

    Machiavelli's philosophy was that "The end justifies the means." This meant that the end result is the most important, and how you got there was of no importance. The Prince was a book of advice to rules on how to found a state and how to stay in power. Machiavelli explained in his book the many different ways to gain power. One way was to acquire land. The four methods that he discusses to acquire more land is: Your own arms and virtue, fortune, others' arms, and inequity. To Machiavelli, the word virtue meant manliness and strength. Machiavelli also advocates the use of evil to achieve any goals. He gives an example of Agathocles of Syracuse as a proof that this works and will enable the prince to rule the land peacefully through fear. "Born of a potter, this one always had an iniquitous life throughout his years: nonetheless, he accomplished his iniquities with such virtue of spirit and of body that, having joined the militia, he rose through its ranks to become praetor of Syracuse. Being established in rank, and having decided to become prince and to keep with violence and without obligation to others what had been conceded him by agreement... ...one morning he convened the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had had to deliberate things pertinent to the republic; and at a preordained nod…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Prince Rhetorical Analysis
    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The Prince Rhetorical Analysis

    Introduction: Many people who have read The Prince by Niccoló Machiavelli were appalled by Machiavelli’s fierce and authorative tone he used to assert his ideas, especially his concept of how the ends justify the means, which slowly made people begin to criticize him and his book as immoral, wicked, and evil. For this reason, Machiavelli began to be insulted as a ruthless and evil person, or in the adopted term, a Machiavellian. Machiavelli didn’t wish to care for morals or spiritual integrity; however, he didn’t arrange to establish the approach to wickedness. As a matter of fact, he argues that the concept the ends justify the means are meant to be followed, but only when necessary commands for it to happen.…

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli The Prince Rhetorical Analysis
    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Machiavelli The Prince Rhetorical Analysis

    Machiavelli's The Prince Niccolo Machiavelli lived from 1469-1527. During his life he spent time both very well respected and exiled from society. In The Prince Machiavelli shares what he thinks are the greatest attributes of a strong leader. Though this was written hundreds of years ago his incites seem to still be applicable to many modern situations. Machiavelli survived an incredibly tumultuous period in his region.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli rhetorical analysis
    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Machiavelli rhetorical analysis

    To give his advice structure, Machiavelli used an abundance of historical references. One leader he refers to is Francesco Sforza, Duke of Milan. Sforza fought and won power as a Duke, he passed that power on to his sons. His sons avoided war and lost power. This a great story to persuade the reader to think that the advice Machiavelli is giving should be taken. His message is that if a prince is not willing to fight, as Sforza's sons were not, they too may lose power. Machiavelli stresses the point that it is better to be feared than loved. A perfect comparison of the two sides is Hannibal and Scipio. Machiavelli…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's Position In The Florentine Government
    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Machiavelli's Position In The Florentine Government

    To explain this concept and convince Medici, Machiavelli used historical people including Caesar, Cyrus, Alexander and Hannibal. Machiavelli suggests that the people of a state should not be any concern to a prince if the state is in danger of rebellion. This view of how a prince should govern, is often considered unethical and cruel. The people of a state should always be treated fairly and should not have to fear their…

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics