Preview

Machiavelli's Discourses Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
497 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli's Discourses Summary
which will not be difficult, for all they ask is not to be oppressed… all else seek to win the populace over to his side. Which will be easy to do if he protects their interests” (Machiavelli 32). This an important point that every ruler should have into account if they want to have a loyal populace, it is in some way logical and realist: if a ruler stays in good terms with his people, then they will follow him; if this person is not on the side of the people, then why should the people should him? In the same way, talking about his second letter that he called The Discourses, where Machiavelli talks about the different Rome empires and takes them as examples in order to a solid government ruled by one individual. He believed that all periods of time are similar, that is why he used Rome as an example to illustrate what is wrong in a government and the good things (Machiavelli 84-85). One good example that Machiavelli gives in chapter seventeen is about “How corrupt people who came to be free can only hold on their freedom with the greatest of difficulties” (Machiavelli 124). Machiavelli explains that if an individual has become corrupted, there is no chance that they could be reformed, but the only way that a person can be healed from corruption is if they use virtu because they acquire liberty to have the intention to be good and change. “[I]t happens because of the skill [virtu] of one individual who is present by chance, not because of the strength …show more content…
Aristotle and Machiavelli analyze every aspect of the human being to conceive their two theories, and they are aware that human beings are not perfect as Plato and More illustrated in their works who believe that humans have no feeling, or sense, or courage to make changes in their lives. People have a free will and moral principles, they are free to choose whatever is in the benefit of them and their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout The Prince and Discourses, Niccolò Machiavelli talks in great length, and seems to endorse, power, deception, and cruelty. There is one passage in particular that I found to contradict Machiavelli’s viewpoint on dominance and to support the fact that he is perhaps a classical republican. The way Machiavelli praises Rome in Chapter 2 of Discourses shows that he believes there is a way to make the system work without a “prince” being feared by his subjects.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leaders of countries or Princes must make decisions that not many will agree with, but are the best for the populace and he must make them, no matter the cost. Niccolo Machiavelli uses logos, ethos and distinct clear diction to prove the necessity for a ruler to be able to make unpopular decisions, in an excerpt from his book “the Prince” (1532).…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato and Niccolo Machiavelli magnificent ideologies for leaders of the world. First Plato’s dialogue Allegory of the Cave described what would happen if prisoners were chained to a wall and could only see the shadows before them. The shadows were visuals on the wall from the fire blazing behind them. Plato stated a quote about what would happen if those prisoners were to be released out of the cave? His reasoning for this was to produce what the human natures method is of gaining knowledge. Then, Niccolo Machiavelli described in The Prince why qualities are essential in succeeding as a prince. He stated that “qualities bring either blame or praise (Machiavelli). Therefore, it is significant to suppress negative qualities and let the positive…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli worked for the Florentine Republic before the Medici family came into power. According to Vincent Barnett, being a diplomat allowed Machiavelli to gain experience and knowledge on the “winding ways of power politics” and to learn about many powerful political figures. This political experience allowed him to assess the actions of past and present princes. Machiavelli’s Republican beliefs also explain why he disliked principalities. According to Barnett, Machiavelli lost his job in 1512 and was “imprisoned and tortured for his beliefs and associations” due to his support towards the Florentine Republic. These cruelties towards Machiavelli explain why he strongly believes that cruelty from princes can be unjust.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Machiavelli, no matter how extreme, violent at times, rigorous, and blunt he may come across, by setting examples and guides structured around the utilization of ruthlessness and egocentric cunning as the process of gaining political power, showed what a clear mind he had on what it takes to be an awe-inspiring leader, master of the art of winning a battle, and conquering lands. In this paper, by comparing the two, human nature and political potency, through the use of different ideologies of both, Plato and Machiavelli, corroborated that they were very powerful, unparalleled influences in the philosophy of human nature and the processes of political power as theorist of their…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Introduction: Many people who have read The Prince by Niccoló Machiavelli were appalled by Machiavelli’s fierce and authorative tone he used to assert his ideas, especially his concept of how the ends justify the means, which slowly made people begin to criticize him and his book as immoral, wicked, and evil. For this reason, Machiavelli began to be insulted as a ruthless and evil person, or in the adopted term, a Machiavellian. Machiavelli didn’t wish to care for morals or spiritual integrity; however, he didn’t arrange to establish the approach to wickedness. As a matter of fact, he argues that the concept the ends justify the means are meant to be followed, but only when necessary commands for it to happen.…

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human nature has been the discussion of many of philosophical works. There are some who believe human beings are inherently bad, individualistic and greedy. There are those who believe humans are inherently good and seek the best possible outcomes for society as a whole. Upon reading Niccolò Machiavelli’s The Prince, Karl Marx’s The Communist Manifesto, and John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government the audience may begin to understand how those ideas of human nature can have an effect on an individual’s political ideology. Machiavelli, Marx, and Locke all expressed in their works how they viewed human nature and gave historical background and evidence of how their opinions of human nature directly affected their political ideology and how…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli: a Cynic?

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many writings argue that human kind is born capable of evil things or that they are born either good or evil. Machiavelli argues simply that man is self-centered and only after self preservation. He argues that mankind is immoral and greedy. His opinions are apparent as he states, "It may be said of men in general that they are ungrateful, voluble, dissemblers, anxious to avoid danger, and covetous of gain," in the eighteenth paragraph of The Prince. These thoughts and views have gained him the title of a cynic. More than a cynic however, Machiavelli is but a realist.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    "A good writer is one you can read without breaking a sweat. If you want a workout, you don’t lift a book—you lift weights. Yet we’re brainwashed to believe that the more brilliant the writer, the tougher the going."…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The corruption within principalities is evident, Machiavelli states that, “a prince had nothing else to do than to excel all the rest in luxury, indulgence… consequently soon drew upon himself the general hatred of the…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato and Machiavelli, both take into account in their writings the power of the people in society, however, both have different ways of dealing with this unchecked power. Plato wants to establish a society, based upon his concept of logos that there is some forms of eternal common good, that need to be followed, so he wants to set up a Philosopher King, instead of a democracy. Machiavelli points out that regardless of the system in place the individual in charge needs to pay attention to the opinions of the people, adapting his conduct based upon the changing of this opinion. Machiavelli does not believe in some eternal truth on how to govern, but rather different scenarios and different people in similar situations as others may require differents…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Both St. Augustine and Machiavelli believed that in order to understand the true nature of society you must see men for what they truly were. Augustine and Machiavelli are similar in their pessimistic views toward human nature, looking at human self-love and self-interest and believed it to be full of evil, cruelty, betrayal, violence and tied that relationship into the creation of war. For both philosophers a good society is actually something that for almost all men is an unreachable attribute that can only be written about and not actually fully experienced in my view. For Augustine I feel it is a truly heavenly earth where all men are divine and are as close to the city of Heaven as you can be on earth. For Machiavelli it is a state of complete acceptance of each man’s role and how that role fits into society like a puzzle piece. In order to examine each philosopher’s view further, we must break their thoughts into three separate categories which are: human nature, political authority, and religious beliefs. This essay will take an in-depth look at both St. Augustine and Machiavelli, compare and contrast their views, and provide evidence that on some level the two thinkers were very similar in their ideology.…

    • 2815 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A good leader is one who can stand up against the norm and take risks to uphold their state. According to Machiavelli, in his book The Prince, this includes taking actions that are not favored by the majority. Though Machiavelli was born on May 3rd, 1469 and only wrote his book in 1513, his ideas were so significant that they apply even to contemporary leaders. Angela Merkel, the chancellor of Germany, is facing situations that can either prove her strength as a leader or set the European Union on a road to destruction. On top of dealing with the major Greek debt crisis, she has been faced with the task of deciding how to handle the Syrian refugees. Using the examples and analysis provided by Machiavelli, Merkel’s best plan would be to pressure…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. When Machiavelli discusses that there are two kinds of combat, one with laws and one with force, what he is really talking about is that for a prince to be successful he must learn how to manage both. Machiavelli uses the lion and the fox example in order to make a metaphor out of the entire situation. A fox is cunning and smart and is therefore immune to traps. However, a fox cannot defend itself against a larger and more powerful animal such as a wolf — that’s where the lion comes in. A lion is not going to be as nimble and sly as a fox would be but it has the brute strength to strike fear into the animal kingdom. So how does this apply to politics? According to Machiavelli, the idea of using laws come naturally to men, for we are the…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays