Preview

Machiavelli's Essay 'The Prince'

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1353 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli's Essay 'The Prince'
Throughout history, many rulers have been overthrown, conspired against, and assassinated. Many would argue that this was due to these rulers not knowing how to control their people, but upon reading the short essay, “The Prince” by Niccoló Machiavelli, one would realize that rulers have been ruined only due to their inability to rule. A ruler could have commendable, honorable qualities that people want their ruler to possess, but these exact qualities would led to their ruin. Thus a good ruler must have both good and bad qualities. They must show off their good in public, but display their bad only when no one’s looking, otherwise they’ll be taken advantage of, and thrown out of power. One such ruler who had a great ability to rule was Catherine …show more content…
People like to see certain qualities in their rulers like generosity, humane, trustworthy, loyal, merciful, honorable, and conscientiousness (Machiavelli, 83). A good ruler should jump at any opportunity to display these qualities the people like to see in their rulers, but they should hide their bad qualities at all cost. This short essay, however, didn’t suggest that rulers had to get rid of their bad qualities, but rather hide them. A good ruler needs bad qualities to survive otherwise they’d be taken advantage of. Someone could overthrow the ruler with their cunningness the current ruler can’t beat him with or be defeated by an opposing enemy. He needs to be cruel, controlling, and inhumane if he wants to keep his kingdom under his power. The people, however, don’t need to know he has those qualities. He needs the people to be on his side, so he could preserve his authority. If he has majority of the population on his side, no one could take over. No one would believe any conspiracies going around, and if someone tries to harm the ruler, his subjects would protect him. In concluding words, a good …show more content…
A decent ruler must understand that it’s better to be feared than loved. With fear comes control, and rulers can use the fear they installed into their subjects to keep them in order. Just like how Robespierre terrorized the French to keep them under his control, a ruler must be feared, so he’ll have his subjects dreading the punishment to come after committing a crime. Cesare Borgia, for instance, was seen as a cruel ruler, but this cruelty united the people of Romagna to make the kingdom more peaceful and orderly (Machiavelli, 77). Being loved by the people should be a ruler’s last concern because then he’ll find himself being seen as a friend rather than a ruler. Like Machiavelli said, it truly is for the best that a ruler is feared instead of loved for their own safety (Machiavelli, 78). However, at all costs, a ruler should avoid being hated. Hatred is a strong emotion, and it gets the best of everyone. If a ruler is hated, he’ll find himself thrown out of a power, and even assassinated like the French people did to Louis XVI. Simply put, a ruler must realize the manner he must take upon while ruling to keep his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is a significant analysis of Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince. This book explores multiple concepts on leadership and governance for a Prince to legislate on his road to success. Therefore, I will bring a compelling conclusion on how Russian President Vladimir Putin is a modern Machiavelli. To get a full understanding towards Niccolo Machiavelli’s political theory, we must first examine what’s managed to inspire his view of an ideal government. In the book, The Prince, Machiavelli introduces insightful claims on how the Roman Empire’s legitimacy brought a secure and stable society. In fact, presenting the Roman Empire’s platform helped the reader to thoroughly understand Machiavelli’s political theory regarding governance and the…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ruling through minor nobles such as Scrope of Bolton, Fitzhugh and Greystoke show his capacity to be a good king as he knew that his relationship with more of the major nobles was poor and that he couldn’t trust them. By ruling through minor nobles he felt more secure and could easily manipulate them to do as he wanted. If he tried to pass useful legislation, voting to give him custom duties for life to secure a steady income, whilst with the major nobles, they wouldn’t have co-operated as easily with him. So his relationship was much more productive and left him less…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leaders of countries or Princes must make decisions that not many will agree with, but are the best for the populace and he must make them, no matter the cost. Niccolo Machiavelli uses logos, ethos and distinct clear diction to prove the necessity for a ruler to be able to make unpopular decisions, in an excerpt from his book “the Prince” (1532).…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte is a well known political leader of the modern world. His conquests into other European countries and his military knowledge make him the historical legend that he has come to be. He made himself emperor of France and ended the French Revolution. Bonaparte’s successes in France cause him to be revered as a great leader who exemplifies Niccolò Machiavelli’s beliefs regarding the leadership of a country. Machiavelli offers advice to political leaders in his novel, The Prince, which is proven relevant through Napoleon’s ability to be war-minded, feared, and a good leader.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joseph Stalin Dbq Analysis

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Over the course of time, rulers are known as sovereigns who protect their empire as well as their people. They are required to sustain order, harmony as well as being content with their empire. Throughout history we have seen many leaders the good & the bad. Not all leaders were willing to listen to their people, as well as giving them what they want but some enforced their power and struck fear into their people. Rulers did many things throughout the course of history to show and acquire dominance across their empire, Louis XIV of France & Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union are prime examples who used terror and manipulation to gain sovereignty of their empires.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The prince may gain power, but not glory. He gains esteem and glory through his courage. He must have wisdom to choose the least risky venture and act on it courageously and wisdom in picking his advisors. It is extremely important to gain the support of the people because you will need it in times of trouble. It also takes that same courage and wisdom to keep up the morale of his people during those troubled times. That is why a prince needs to relate to his people. He does not have to be loved by the people, but he must not be hated and should always be respected. However, Machiavelli makes a powerful case that it is better for a leader to be feared than loved. He feels that men respond more strongly to fear than love. Fear is constant, but love of the people can easily change. The prince cannot make people love him, but he has control over his people’s fear of him. Therefore, the course of action that the prince can best control is what he should pursue. In answering the question of whether it is better to be loved than feared, Machiavelli writes, “The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If a Prince rules liberally, he will be given a good reputation, but it can hurt you in the long run. Just having a good reputation won’t help out the people. It’s better to have a bad reputation and govern the right way, than to have a good reputation and destroy your land. A government should also be ran on the greediness of money and supplies. A ruler must always be rapacious with money. If he needs to spend a lot of money for something, he won’t have to tax the people even more than they already are. “…had not moderated his expenses, he would have destroyed his government.” “Nothing wastes so rapidly as liberality.” (Machiavelli 187) Machiavelli also wrote that to be a great leader, one must know how to be cruel to his subjects. If the Prince’s people feared him, then they would obey him rather than if they didn’t. If they didn’t fear him they may think that they can overpower him and rebel. “…it is much safer to be feared than loved” (Machiavelli…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The title of king itself supplies the bearer with too much power for which one man can hold. "All Men are created equal." He had none that denied him of any of his wants and desires, whether personally or politically. A ruler must only be able to derive their "Powers from the Consent of the Governed," of which the king had none. Wise rulers must surround themselves with those they trust. The best rulers truly represent their people.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli insists that a ruler must do whatever is in his power to rule his people regardless of whether his actions are moral or immoral and that "...it is safer to be feared than to be loved when one of the two must be lacking....For one can generally say this about men: that they are ungrateful, fickle, simulators and deceivers, avoiders of danger, greedy for gain, and while you work for their good they are completely yours, offering you their blood, their property, their lives, and their sons..." (Jacobus 44). These comments support…

    • 1033 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While Machiavelli believes that the higher road should be taken whenever possible, there are situations that may require that a leader set aside traditional morality in favor of cunning and trickery. As a pragmatist, he sees morality as a barrier to success in certain cases: "…it is necessary for a prince who wishes to maintain his position to learn how not to be good." (Machiavelli, 127) Machiavelli's prince must learn how not to be good, because "…it is not necessary for a prince to have all of the above-mentioned qualities, but it is very necessary for him to appear to have them." (Machiavelli, 135) As a leader, the prince is subject to specific standards by the people and must always have a favorable and consistent public…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli thought human nature was two-dimensional. He saw humans as predictable, foreseeing their responses to the princes’ actions. Because humans are so unsophisticated in Machiavelli’s eye, they can only love or hate their prince, making them unable to see an intermediate to the good and bad in their ruler. Humans’…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience: conscientious and public opposition of law or government demands to influence legislation of government policy. Coined by the renowned Henry David Thoreau and built upon the freedoms of speech, press, and assembly, civil disobedience is used worldwide by citizens to voice themselves to the government. Breaches of law have not only been prominent in Thoreau’s era, Martin Luther King Jr.’s era, but now, in current opposition against President Trump’s inauguration. As with every controversy, civil disobedience is met with two conflicting sides: is it wrong to break a law in any circumstance or should citizens be allowed to protest to bring change to the government? The core of a democratic-republic country is it’s citizens.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    absolutism and democracy

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Machiavelli once wrote about how to be a successful prince. Machiavelli explained that you have to be in good graces with your people in order to be a successful prince. Fear is a good thing, but love is also a good thing. Your people must be able to count on you, but they must also not want to revolt against you, which is why an absolute monarchy is the best thing according to them, at the time.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    which will not be difficult, for all they ask is not to be oppressed… all else seek to win the populace over to his side. Which will be easy to do if he protects their interests” (Machiavelli 32). This an important point that every ruler should have into account if they want to have a loyal populace, it is in some way logical and realist: if a ruler stays in good terms with his people, then they will follow him; if this person is not on the side of the people, then why should the people should him?…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays