Preview

Machiavelli's Injustice In The United States

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
511 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli's Injustice In The United States
The basis of our American Government started out many years ago during a period called the Enlightenment Era. In this time, enlightenment thinkers thrived and were able to share their ideas on politics. An impactful thinker named Montesquieu was able to create immense change in his time and in ours. His system created three branches that, “placed limits and controls on each other” (Jackson, J.S pg.165), and are known as the judicial, legislative, and executive branches. This system he devised was implemented into the U.S Constitution so a tyrannical king ruling the people wouldn’t exist, and was called the separation of powers. Although, not every enlightment thinker’s ideas favored the people. Machiavelli is a prime example, he thought that as long it was for the greater good, then it didn’t matter which you did to achieve it. This has led to the government being able to infringe on certain rights of individuals to justify imprisoning them. . One of …show more content…
Unfortunately, this has led to the infringement of certain people’s rights. In the infamous site Guantanamo bay, numerous individuals suspected in aiding then attack of 9/11 have been jailed for, “almost a decade, engaged in torture as that term is understood in international law” (Adam Liptak). Before 9/11 many of the laws concerning air travel would seem almost alien compared to now. Items such as liquids, knifes, and even lighters were common on flights. Even according to Gerald L. Dillingham, Director of Civil Aviation Issues, “was not as secure as the government had intended them to be” (pg.6). Finally, the last changes have greatly infringed upon the right to privacy. Many individuals with the same race of those who participated in the 9/11 have faced major discrimination. This discrimination has made it much more likely for their houses to be searched under the suspicion of terrorist

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    powers. The idea that power needed a limit came from the Magna Carta 1215/ if all the…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    First, I am going to take a look at the division of power within the American government by starting off with the legislative branch. The legislative branch is responsible for coming up with the laws. In Article I of the U.S. Constitution states, "All legislative Powers…shall be vested in a Congress of the United States and the House of Representatives." The U.S. congress is divided into the House of Representatives, known as the lower house, and the Senate, known as the upper house. The Congress' role in the government is to legislate- to make laws. The laws enacted by Congress are called statutes. The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to make laws (Theodore J. Lowi).…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States of America have a federal constitution, where the President of the United States, Congress, and the judiciary share powers, and the federal government shares sovereignty with the state governments. This is the stark opposite to the unitary system in the UK where sovereignty lies in parliament and some powers are given to local assemblies. There are many types of federalism; all have been a dominant influence in the American political system at some point due to the style of leadership brought in by each new presidential candidate. Throughout U.S. history, the division of power between the federal government and state governments has been the subject of continuous political interest. After suffering from the British government's tyrannical ideologies that led to the American Revolution (1775), many Americans were conditioned to distrust centralized governmental powers. As a result, when Congress drew up the Articles of Confederation in 1781, the new central government was assigned very few powers. The central government had little authority over taxation, court systems and commerce. The states were essentially politically independent governments, each free to regulate commerce in whatever ever way they wanted, make money, and have their state courts hold judgment over national laws mostly entrenched in the US constitution. In 1787 a Constitutional Convention was called to restructure the government and create a national economy. This convention was called as many Americans realized after the American Revolution, that such an unorganized governmental structure entirely based on state powers would hold back political and economic growth of America as a country. Debates were rife between federalists, those supporting a strong central government as proposed in a Virginia plan, and anti-federalists supporting continued strong state…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government was set up under the Articles of Confederation, America’s first constitution. The founders were so afraid of a strong central government that they gave all power to the states, rather than set up an over-seeing national government. The Revolution was fought to get away from an overbearing and unfair ruler, so it is understandable why they wouldn’t want another monarchy to take over. The problem was that the Articles of Confederation gave little to no power at all to their national government, causing distress and non-compliance between the states. The Articles of Confederation denied the government the ability to take care of the states and the union. An influential philosopher at the time, Hobbes, believes that it is the sole purpose of the national government to enforce peace and laws; thus making life, liberty, and the pursuit of property possible. Another influential philosopher at the time, Locke, also believes that a central government is necessary to promote public good, to protect property and promote…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of powers instilled checks and balances among the branches so that tyranny was an impossibility and good government would be in place. They were protected from each other by constitutional means because if one branch was out of line one of the other two was capable of shutting down the unconstitutional actions of the converse branch. For example, the legislative branch could make laws, but they executive had to approve of them in order for them to be set in place. However, if the president vetoed a bill the legislative could overturn the veto if two-thirds of the house and senate believed the bill was constitutional and beneficial for society. Also, the Founders instilled office positions in government with great power so that the positions would appeal to ambitious people. Man’s personal motives prevented tyranny because if ambitious people were in power they would have great incentive to abide by the Constitution and keep their position because they wanted to continue to posses this power. Human ambition is part…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Revolution changed American politically by allowing the people to be governed by representation, a central government, and a state government. Americans wanted a government different from the one of England so they created their own. Document I, informs us from a Federalists point of view that abuses of government must be controlled, the need of control of both the people and the government is necessary because of human nature, and the government must have measures to control itself. In order to ensure that tyranny will not arise and for every state to be satisfied there is a separation of powers. The federal government is divided into three branches: the Legislature, the Executive, and the Judicial Branches. These branches have a checks and balances system, to establish that not no branch is superior to another and that nothing can be done by one branch until it is “checked” by another branch. The Constitution was made to control the governments and the Bill of Rights to control the people. The Constitution limited the power of the federal government and the Bill of Rights specified the rights that the people of America possess. Some Americans feared that the government will have little power but the Constitution, which replaced the Articles of Confederation, granted the federal government more power.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government that our country operates under in modern times is quite different than the government in place at our country’s conception. However, they do share many of the same practices and ideologies. The Articles of Confederation were founded on the basis of a very limited national government, and the idea that states should interact with each other through a “loose league of friendship”. In this friendship, the states would work and trade together, but no form of central government was needed. This system was not nearly sufficient for the nations problems at the time. Recognizing the need for a reform, the nations leaders tried to reform the current system, and with little success, the decision was made that they should start from scratch and create a government that they believed to be the saving grace for America. This new creation was known as the Constitution. Thought to be a more comprehensive and equal system of government,…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government was a topic of controversy in pre colonial America, and it still is today. However, America wouldn’t be America without the ideas that the founding fathers set out. As presented in Wickers lecture on The Constitution, The Constitution set forth the idea of the three branches of government. This makes for a more fair system of government, and a far cry from a king born into the right family ruling the people’s every move. There would be no democracy,…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787, fifty five men met in Philadelphia to help form the great country we live in today, called America. The United States of America is the only country to be created based solely on the advancement of individual freedom. In order to gain freedom, the people had to have their own rights, and the rights given to the people were written on the constitution which was created by the fifty men that met in Philadelphia. The constitution allowed individuals in America to have their own rights as well as limit government power. It was important that the government had limited powers, because with limited power it allowed American citizens to have more freedom. A few doctrines to help reduce the power of the American government are the bill of rights, separation of powers, and checks and balances. The bill of rights, are the first ten amendments in the constitution that allow American citizens certain rights that the government cannot take away. Separation of powers splits the government into three branches and gives them specific powers, these three branches are the legislative branch, executive branch, and judicial branch. While separation of powers separates government into three branches, checks and balances limit the three branches powers so that no branch is stronger than one another. These three doctrines are a few key reasons on how the American government power is limited.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Paper 51

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages

    James Madison starts the federalist paper by stating that each branch should be for the most part independent. Madison also stated that no one branch should have too much power in selecting members of the other two branches. It would mean that the citizens should select the president, the legislators, and the judges. The members of each branch should not be too dependent on the members of the other two branches. Congress was split into two branches, the House of Representatives and the Senate, and provided for a different method of election in each branch. The best security against a gradual concentration of power in any one branch is to provide constitutional safeguards that would make such concentration difficult. The constitutional rights of all must check one man's personal interests and ambitions. We all know that men like to abuse power and the very need for government itself proves they overdo it because "if men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary"(Madison, 62). These branches should have the power to defend us from any intruders. The biggest problem with framing a government is that the government must be able to control the people, but equally important, must be able and forced to "control itself." "A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions" (Madison, 63).…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One good idea that was brought up in the Constitution was the separation of powers. Ultimately, the constitution provided too much power to the federal government, but the separation of powers was a step away from a government like a monarchy. The separation of powers allowed the separate branches to check and balance each other, so no one branch was too powerful. This is argument made of why the president isn’t like a king. Under the Constitution, even if the President vetoes a bill, Congress can overrule the veto. However, the President could serve as many terms as they wanted, which is similar to a king. Although the Federalists implemented checks and balances into the system, the government under the Constitution was still formed in a way that the wealthy ruling class would be put into positions of power. So even though the Constitution had good ideas, it was ultimately elitist and too similar to the British…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Common Sense, Thomas Paine says that the purpose of a government is to protect life, liberty and property. He says that the way we judge a government should only rest upon how the government preforms this action. If the government does a great job protecting life, liberty and property then therefore the government is good. Likewise, if the government does a horrible job at it then it is bad. This idea of just stating what a government is supposed to be started something bigger than anything any country has ever done and it made America the greatest example for revolting against its…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution is the place where it states, clearly and explicitly, which powers we choose to give, and which powers we refuse to give. The Article IV created a strong national government that was powerful enough to take care of business, but also let states run themselves without interference from the government. In old fashioned monarchies, they held all powers of government, the power to make the law, the power to enforce the law, and the power to judge the law with no checks or balances. So when they designed the Constitution of the United States, the Framers insisted for the separation of powers to keep the government in check .The Framers believed the most important action in preventing tyranny in America was to divide the key powers of government amongst the three branches. They could have stopped there, leaving it up to the officials of the three branches to figure out how to defend their own powers and limit the powers of the others. But that might have led to a conflict between the branches. So the Framers carefully constructed a system of articles of seven divisions, that provided specific power to allow each of the branches of government equal…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    9 11

    • 1360 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the major changes that were caused by the attack of 9/11 was the introduction to the Patriot Act. “The USA PATRIOT Act is an Act of Congress that was signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001. The title of the act is a ten-letter acronym (USA PATRIOT) that stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001The Patriot Act gives the U.S. power to deter and punish terrorist acts in the U.S. and around the world.”2 This law was passed just forty-six days after the attacks on the twin towers and the pentagon occurred. The patriot act dramatically reduced restrictions on law enforcement agencies' ability to search telephone, e-mails, medical, financial, and other records; eased restrictions on foreign intelligence gathering within the United States. Basically there was nothing off limits to government agencies such as the F.B.I., they were able to obtain any documents they felt necessary to fight terrorism. “It also expanded the Secretary of the…

    • 1360 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guantanamo Bay

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Safety and security in air transport around the world became stricter following the 9/11 attacks. There were more regulations around what people could bring in and on planes, and anyone suspected of terrorism or involvement with the al-Qaeda organisation (one of the world’s largest terrorist organisations) or the Taliban could be detained in Guantanamo Bay without being fairly charged or trialled.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays