Preview

Machiavlellis rule likea lion and a fox

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
905 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavlellis rule likea lion and a fox
Like a “Lion” and a “Fox”

“Is it better to be loved more than feared or feared more than loved?” This quote is just one of the many questions Machiavelli wrote in his book The Prince. The theme of The Prince is to act like a lion and a fox. Being a lion is being honorable and well respected while being a fox is being sly and secretive. Two “New Monarchs” Louis XI of France and Isabella and Ferdinand of Spain used Machiavelli’s advice. While both Monarchs took Machiavelli’s advice to gain wealth through taxation or new industries and power through war, Isabella and Ferdinand of Spain took Machiavelli’s advice to heart and took control of Spain with the illusion of being a Christian to be respected, Louis XI was indecisive did not capitalize on isolation and relied on luck. That means Isabella and Ferdinand used The Prince to a higher degree then Louis XI. Isabella and Ferdinand took control of their nation while acting as moral Christians and Louis XI stopped robbers to show power. In order to stop the crime in Spain the “Hermandes” were revived. The Hermandes acted as a local police to stop violence with severe punishment. This is an example of how an honorable thing such as ending crime puts fear into the people. The greatest point Spain took from Machiavelli’s The Prince was to appear religious. Ferdinand was not religious but the illusion of his religion gave him more respect and the ability to make all of the Jews accept baptism. Then anti-Semitic pogroms swept the town either converting or killing the Jews and if they did convert they would be considered “New Christians”. Isabella and Ferdinand feared the power of nobility and rebuilt the council with middle-class men while Louis XI used his army to stop robbers but he never struck fear in his people so he did not entirely follow Machiavelli’s advice. In the category of showing power over their nations Spain showed much more power than France. Isabella and Ferdinand of Spain used severe taxation to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's suggestion that a ruler should rule like both a lion and a fox is exemplified to very different degrees with the monarchs Isabella and Ferdinand of Spain, and Louis XI of France. Isabella and Ferdinand were strong, ferocious leaders who implemented local and state level authority impressively. They also cleverly established a guilded appearance as religious figures connected through diplomatic alliance to the Catholic church. They follow Machiavelli's suggestion to the T. Louis XI of France, tells a different tale. Although he was known as the “Spider King”, infamous of his scheming, he was cleverly created footholds in the capitalistic realm of his country. His greatest downfall was his lack of foresight, and sheepish tendencies toward reclusiveness and isolation.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1494, Florence, Italy was overtaken by France. There the Prince, leader of Florence at the time was the third generation Medici. Given to him was a series of chapters of The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli written in 1513. Niccolo Machiavelli was known for his vast knowledge in politics and literature. Thus after being exiled from Florence by the French, he wrote from experience and vast knowledge to the current prince so he would know how to rule. In order to be a prestige prince, he must always be ready for war, act like a lion and fox, be feared but not hated, and to not take the property of citizen and people, but if it is a new prince having a knowledgeable advisee also…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lao-Tzu Vs Machiavelli

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Next, one who is feared. The worst is one who is despised.” (207) Machiavelli insists that though to be both loved and feared would be best, being the two at once is impossible, thus “it is much safer to be feared than to be loved when one of the two must be lacking.” (227) On the subject of being despised, Machiavelli fest strongly that a Prince should avoid being considered that at all costs. “A prince must guard himself against being despised and hated[...]”…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli was a Florentine man of many skills. He was a renowned politician, author, and philosopher during the Renaissance, whose views and opinions affect the way people still think today. The Prince is his most famous work and in it he essentially states that humans are “ungrateful, fickle, deceptive and deceiving”. For that reason, a leader should rule through fear rather than love. However, what Europeans needed during the 14th, 15th, and 16th centuries were compassionate rulers. They were already frightened and disunited during the middle ages, thus adding a fearful leader to the mix would not help citizens feel safer.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The prince may gain power, but not glory. He gains esteem and glory through his courage. He must have wisdom to choose the least risky venture and act on it courageously and wisdom in picking his advisors. It is extremely important to gain the support of the people because you will need it in times of trouble. It also takes that same courage and wisdom to keep up the morale of his people during those troubled times. That is why a prince needs to relate to his people. He does not have to be loved by the people, but he must not be hated and should always be respected. However, Machiavelli makes a powerful case that it is better for a leader to be feared than loved. He feels that men respond more strongly to fear than love. Fear is constant, but love of the people can easily change. The prince cannot make people love him, but he has control over his people’s fear of him. Therefore, the course of action that the prince can best control is what he should pursue. In answering the question of whether it is better to be loved than feared, Machiavelli writes, “The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Price describes how the ruler should gain, maintain, and increase political power. Machiavelli’s study and beliefs on human nature led him to make noteworthy political statements for the time. Key concepts discussed in The Prince include the fact that a politician should manipulate the people and use any means to gain power. Machiavelli also noted that the prince should combine the cunning of a fox with the ferocity of a lion to achieve his goals, and sometimes would have to put aside his morals when making political decisions. Furthermore, Machiavelli believed that it was desirable for a leader to be both feared and love; but it is difficult to be both at the same time, and it is much safer to be feared than to be loved. Fifteenth century rulers, by part of Renaissance humanism, began the process of order through centralization of power. The rulers employed the aggressive methods implied by the political ideas of the Renaissance to rebuild their governments. Beginning first in Italy, then in France, Spain, and England, the result was the rise of numerous powerful and unforgiving rulers with a common goal in mind: the centralization of power and the abolishment of disorder and violence. The “new monarchs”, Louis XI of France, Henry VII of England, and Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain, were tough, cynical, and calculation ruler and seemed to be abiding by Machiavelli’s…

    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's philosophy was that "The end justifies the means." This meant that the end result is the most important, and how you got there was of no importance. The Prince was a book of advice to rules on how to found a state and how to stay in power. Machiavelli explained in his book the many different ways to gain power. One way was to acquire land. The four methods that he discusses to acquire more land is: Your own arms and virtue, fortune, others' arms, and inequity. To Machiavelli, the word virtue meant manliness and strength. Machiavelli also advocates the use of evil to achieve any goals. He gives an example of Agathocles of Syracuse as a proof that this works and will enable the prince to rule the land peacefully through fear. "Born of a potter, this one always had an iniquitous life throughout his years: nonetheless, he accomplished his iniquities with such virtue of spirit and of body that, having joined the militia, he rose through its ranks to become praetor of Syracuse. Being established in rank, and having decided to become prince and to keep with violence and without obligation to others what had been conceded him by agreement... ...one morning he convened the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had had to deliberate things pertinent to the republic; and at a preordained nod…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    (Strength of argument): For Machiavelli, he believes that a prince should be feared than loved by the people and he specifies, “..a wise prince should build his foundation upon that which belongs to him, not upon that which belongs to others; he must strive only to avoid hatred, as has been said” (Jacobus 47). However, in this case, his argument can be flawed and turned against him. (Tempering the Position): Although Machiavelli does a really great significant job of using logic, reason, and history to convince his readers the proper way a prince should rule; however, he didn’t imply support to show how a prince to avoid being hated by his people because, he too knows, that there will be some people who will learn to hate one from their actions they perform. (Conversation): As a matter of fact, I have experienced a situation similar to what Machiavelli doesn’t want to happen. I am not at all a prince, but I have had people hate me for my beliefs, my attitude, or my actions. There was this one time where this girl began to grow this hatred towards me just because I kicked a pit-bull so he wouldn’t bite this little 6-year old I baby sat. My intention wasn’t to harm the dog, but it was the only way to buy me some time to be able carry the boy back inside my house safely. Even though this act I committed was considered animal cruelty, I had to do it to save the child. However, the girl still went against me on this action, so there goes to show that people can hate someone else because of how they see and…

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    magnesuim

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Absolutism was considered the most effective government during the time by giving the rulers unlimited power. Machiavelli, who wrote The Prince, felt that the best way to rule was to be feared by the people. He stated, “Men have less hesitation in offending a man who is loved than one who is feared, for love is held by a bond of obligation which, as men are wicked, is broken whenever personal advantage suggests it” (Document 1). In this quote, it explains how if you were a ruler that was feared, you would receive more respect from the people then if you were loved. King James I also believed that absolutism was the most effective way to rule. In his opinion, kings were Gods and he strongly supported the Divine Right. Divine Right is the belief that kings get their authority from God. "The state of monarchy is the most supreme thing upon earth; for kings are not only God's lieutenants upon earth, and sit upon God's throne, but even by God himself they are called gods" (Document 2). This quote explains how King James I believed he gained his authority from God and if you were chosen to rule, then you must be treated as if you were a god.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli, born in Florence in 1469, remains one of the most controversial authors to this day. His work demonstrates his expertise with military power, political success and historical events. His experience and understanding is a sum of all aspects of his life—from serving on the commune of Florence to carrying out his own military missions. Even when Machiavelli was accused of conspiracy and sentenced to a period of exile and torture, that did not keep him from producing some of his most influential work, including The Prince. The final, most renowned section of this book focuses on the qualities and assets of a prince, himself. Although many other theorists have covered the topics expressed, Machiavelli—being the pragmatist that he is—insists that practical, rather than ideal rules should be applied toward a Prince’s characteristics. In chapter XV, he acknowledges the fact men never live every part of their life virtuously, and that should a Prince strive to do so, he would surely ruin himself. Instead, Machiavelli believes the Prince should exhibit values that will gain him the most important benefits, even if that means not abiding by strictly virtuous characteristics. He expands on this in chapter XVI, describing that although generosity is strongly desired, it can be detrimental to the Prince’s reign. Because others cannot see truly virtuous generosity, in order for the Prince to be considered generous he must appear extremely lavish. This is obtained by raising taxes, which harms more people than it benefits and ultimately creates hatred and disrespect. In chapter XVII, Machiavelli continues to talk about the balance between cruelty and clemency, and which favors the Prince’s rein. Although ideally every Prince wants to be considered merciful, it is better to be called cruel if that is what it takes to keep the people peaceful and loyal. If he shows no mercy to the few people that disobey the law, the greater…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli’s The Prince is a comprehensive guide on how a prince should govern. Written in 1513, it addresses a multitude of topics, including whether one should be feared or loved, how to avoid hatred, and how a prince should spend his money. While the advice was more applicable in the Renaissance, when most rulers governed with absolute power, either in their city state or their country, it does not apply well to today, when institutions such as parliaments and congresses exist to check the power of nation’s rulers. This is easily seen through Machiavelli’s advice on cruelty and being feared versus being loved.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's Premise

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1- The prince is better feared than loved, although striking a balance between the two would be best. As Machiavelli stated that the prince should do his utmost to escape hatred and too much fear would create hatred. The prince should try to balance love and fear based on his people and the situation at hand.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Prince, Machiavelli writes about the ways in which a prince should rule and serve up to his expectations. Many rulers look towards The Prince as a guidebook that enables them to experience the ruling systems of the past and incorporating these principles to their period of time. Even though Machiavelli wrote The Prince primarily due to the situation that his city of Florence was currently in, his advice and suggestions reach distances far apart from Florence, rather, it reaches the entire world as seen by the situations of rulers in Rome and in Western Europe. However, despite all of these differences in ruling, there are universal principles in which a prince must follow in order to form the true qualities of a successful leadership…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early 1500s kings, princes, and rulers were set both based on their characteristics. This was one of the things that Niccolo Machiavelli and Cesare Borgia expressed. Chapter 15 concerning things for which men, and especially princes, or praised or blamed the author(s) stated that “for many have pictured republics and principalities which in fact have never been known or seen, because how one lives is so far distant from how one ought to live, that he who neglects what is done for what ought to be done, for a man who wishes to act entirely up to his professions of virtue soon meets with what destroys him among so much that is evil”(Edward.Ch 15.The Prince. United States,Bantam,1513.Print) That is saying that fear preserves you by a dread of punishment which never fails which shows that it is better to show love or friendship in such power.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays