The peasant family harmed by the Evremondes years ago was the family of Madame Defarge. Madame Defarge clarifies, “that peasant family so injured by the Evremonde brothers… is my family. Defarge, that sister of the mortally wounded boy upon the ground was my sister, that husband was my sister’s husband, that unborn child was their child, that brother was my brother, that father was my father, those dead are my dead, and that summons to answer for those things descends to me!” (264). She feels that it is her responsibility to exact revenge on the entire Evremonde race and other members of the aristocracy for their cruelty towards the peasants. In later context, Dickens explains, “It was nothing to her, that an innocent man was to die for the sins of his forefathers… It was nothing to her, that his wife was to be made a widow and his daughter an orphan; that was insufficient punishment, because they were her natural enemies and her prey, and as such had no right to live,” showing that Madame Defarge does not care that Darnay is completely innocent of all charges and wants nothing to do with his family (281). Because she was so affected by the massacre of her family many years ago, she feels the need to punish the entire Evremonde lineage, which includes Darnay, Lucie, and their child. For that reason, she goes on a mission to avenge …show more content…
Manette and Charles Darnay, and Madame Defarge and the Evremonde family show how gratuitous revenge leads to deadly consequences. Although many are aware that inflicting deadly revenge upon others is wrong, the misconduct of others against loved ones leads people to take those extreme actions. Whether justified or not, revenge is most often meant to honor the memory of another through enforcing suffering upon the alleged wrongdoer. All things considered, we learn that being merciful and righteous will lead to a better end than being barbaric and