Preview

Magistrates Court Vs Crown Court

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
756 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Magistrates Court Vs Crown Court
There are a variety of courts who have various actions and authorities of power but I will be looking and discussing the difference and powers a MagistratesCourt and Crown Court has. A Magistrates court is often made up of three people recruited from the local community. These persons do not have any professional qualifications and are known as Justices of the Peace. There are over 400 Magistrates courts existing in and around England and Wales. A Crown Court on the other hand acts as a single entity involving professional judges and barristers with addition of using a jury to try a person. There are roughly 77+ Crown courts across the country and often found situated in local cities. However, the most serious crimes like murder can also be …show more content…
The Magistrates deals with three case types which includes:

type 1.Summary offence: this involves 90%+ cases being minor criminal acts such as the like of drunk and disordlerly, motor offences, vandalism, petty theft and so on.
Type two. Either way: these are cases that could be tried and dealt with via either Magistrates Court or Crown Court setting which may involve the likes of handling stolen goods and/or burglary.

Type three. Indictment: theMagistrates Court are able to examine certain cases to determine whether they are serious enough for it to go to Crown Court but they are also able to try some individuals and then send them to the Crown Court for
…show more content…
The powers of the Crown Court can execute a number of types of punishments/sentences suited to a particular crime. They can for example, authorise fines which has no limitations, impose imprisonments which may range from 6monthd to life imprisonment depending on severity of crime, a community service order may also be used and so on. A Crown Court can also sentence those who have been tried in a Magistrate Court, act as an appeal court for cases dealt by Magistrates Court or those appealing against a decision in original trial, they may also sometimes be able to deal with some civil and family

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Add 10-20 drops of each known solution to respective test tubes, do not mix pipets!…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The role of the court is to determine whether or not a crime has been committed and impose a sentence where appropriate. In the first instance the alleged offender will appear in the magistrates court where it will be decided whether or not to grant bail or remand in custody…

    • 2382 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Unit 23

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Also case made law is when the court of appeal acts on a decision made by a lower court and by doing so establishes it in law. However, the judges can only work within the statute/act which is set by parliament. For example judicial review which is a hearing in front of the judge on…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ocr Law Unit1 Chapter 5

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    MUST be heard and sentenced at crown. If an indictable offence is plead not guilty then it must be tried by a jury.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They hear preliminary hearings for all criminal cases, but they then transfer indictable offences, some either way offences that are outside their sentencing powers, or are particularly complex, and applications for bail to the crown court. Magistrates also accompany circuit judges in hearing appeals against conviction/sentencing from the magistrates in the crown court. having the magistrates in the appeals helps them to gain further knowledge on how laws should be interpreted and which sentences are appropriate for which crimes so the same mistakes are not repeated.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Unit 23

    • 6999 Words
    • 28 Pages

    This court deals with mainly criminal cases but rarely civil cases. All criminal cases start off in the Magistrates’ Court and are heard by either lay magistrates or district judges. District judges are legally trained but lay magistrates are not, they do however have to be assisted by a legally trained clerk. Magistrate Courts will only hear cases that have happened in their area and can only administer punishment of up to £5,000 or 6 months imprisonment. If the crime requires more than what the magistrate can administer than the case will be passed on to the Crown Court. Jury can also move up the case to the Crown Court if the defendant asks for trial.…

    • 6999 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The role of Jurors and Magistrates are similar in many ways. A few examples of the similarities would be that both must be 18-70 years old. In addition to this, those who are in the police force or have previous criminal convictions are ruled out. Both magistrates and jurors are members of the public and do not get paid for going to court. However, both can claim expenses for any earnings lost during the time they spent in court. Both parties make their decisions and verdicts on the facts presented to them. Not only this but both can decided whether a defendant is guilty or not guilty.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are two major types of court systems throughout the world. The court systems are juvenile court and adult court. There are different…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    court the case will be tried in at ‘plea before venue’ and ‘mode of trial’…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 our founding fathers created the Constitution of the United States. It took lots of compromising, convincing, but in the end they created a new form of government. One compromise was that the Constitution needed a list of rights that were given to American citizens and could never be changed. This list was called the Bill of Rights. The introductory statement to the Constitution was called the preamble. The preamble summarized everything the Constitution would be explaining the purpose of the Constitution and its guidelines.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Report

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The basic division in the structure of criminal courts is between the lower criminal courts – the local courts, Children’s court and Coroner’s court – and the higher criminal courts – the District Court and the Supreme Court. In observing proceedings at the Local, District and Supreme Courts over a period of three days a number of aspects of the criminal justice system were made apparent. The administration, processes and practices of the criminal trial are extremely varied dependent upon the level of criminal court being observed. The distinctions between the workings of the two courts revealed a number of the differences between summary proceedings and trial upon indictment. The cases observed served to provide evidence for the “two tiers of justice” argument. Also the role of the judiciary was perceived as being particularly interesting especially the high level of discretion that they held in the Local Courts and even to an extent in the District Court primarily when there was no jury present.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Criminal Trial Process

    • 3916 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The seriousness of the matter, in particular whether it involves a summary offence or an indictable offence…

    • 3916 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Trial Process

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The criminal trial process is a vital part of the criminal justice system in NSW as it plays a fundamental role in achieving justice, by determining the innocence or guilt of an offender. Yet, despite the criminal trial process still having many complex issues that remove it of achieving its full means of justice, the process has stood the test of time and lasted for more than two centuries. It aims at lawfully and justly providing victims, offenders and society with the rights of a fair trial. The hierarchies of courts play a crucial role in effectuating justice for the community. The courts jurisdiction is the extent of the court’s authority and is often determined by the hierarchy. The lowest form of court is the Local Court. The Local Court Act 1982 (NSW) outlines the offences that are heard in this court. They are less serious crimes, where matters are tried summarily, but are also the location for bail and committal hearings, where police play a prominent role in achieving justice. The Intermediate and High Courts handle indictable crimes as well as appeals from lower courts. It is in these courts that a decision made sets a doctrine of precedent. The court hierarchy is a major part of the criminal trial process as it allows appeals and precedents to flow easily. It attempts to ensure consistency between judicial decisions, as well as limit the discretion on most judicial verdicts. Appeals and precedents fundamentally ensure efficiency and the effectiveness of achieving justice, but despite them being an effective measure in achieving justice, there are still cheaper and more cost-efficient methods, such as YJC, and Circle Sentencing, that can fulfill the same outcome. The cornerstone of Australia’s criminal trial process is the Adversary System. This refers to the legal procedure where two opposing sides argue a case before an independent, third party eg.…

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Justice Paper

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The court system is mainly run by judges that assure the law is being followed and accept or accept or reject plea agreements, oversee trials, and sentence convicted offenders.(The Criminal Justice System) Judges also decide if an offender may be released before the trial. The court system is made up of three courts; the municipal courts, state courts, and federal courts. The municipal courts have to do with the common cases like; traffic and ordinance violations, small claims cases, domestic cases, misdemeanor offenses, and other preliminary proceedings in felony cases (ncsc.org). State courts deal with most cases, the cases are separated into civil courts and criminal courts. The federal courts deal with the laws that are involved with the constitution, with fewer cases than the state courts the federal cases gain more attention than state…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Personal Narrative

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I was always that good kid that would always try not to do wrong, and be onm track with positive assertions. Then things happened and distracted me from the positive choices I used to make in life. Eventually, it kept building up to the pont where I lost control. Here's a little on how it all unfolded.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics