Preview

Major Consequences Of Alexander's Death

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
428 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Major Consequences Of Alexander's Death
No one was prepared for Alexander’s death; a weak succession, following other complications, arose after his passing. His loyal Macedonian generals wanted to preserve the Macedonian Empire, so they appointed themselves governors of the various provinces in the empire. This led to one major consequence of Alexander’s death, which was the weak governmental succession that followed. The governors were very ambitious, strong-willed men who had conflicting views. These conflicting views led to warfare, which in turn led to the execution or murder of all direct members in the Macedonian royal house. Another major consequence was the unequal distribution of the prosperity of the Macedonian Empire. The urban Greeks, the Macedonians, and the Hellenized

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    a. World War I. Promoted to captain on February 7, 1915, Alexander returned to the Western Front. That fall, he took part in the Battle of Loos where he briefly led the 1st Battalion, Irish Guards as acting major. For his service in the fighting, Alexander was awarded the Military Cross. The following year, Alexander saw action during the Battle of the Somme. Engaged in heavy combat that September, he received the Distinguished Service Order and the French Légion d'honneur.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Alexander’s death, unfortunately the powerful and mighty empire he built up, rapidly declined. But in these remains, were left people of various races and cultures. Even though Alexander’s premature death was devastating it set the groundwork for a new era that is now known as the Hellenistic Age. During the Hellenistic Age, Alexander was responsible for most of Eurasia’s cultural development and diffusion. There were many advancements made during this era, some regarding medicine, military, and math & mechanical sciences.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander maintained Dario’s provinces, called Sapras. He changed the rulers by his generals but since they did not have enough men of his own, the body of administration was formed by the Persians that were already there, maintaining the same structure and the same government system. Regarding the political orientation he tried to introduce some new aspects as necessity to maintain the conquered territories. He imposed the Greek language and favoured the mix marriage between conquered and conquerors to encourage the rapprochement between both people.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexanders the Great death in 323 BCE ushered in a time of chaos, similar to the one Western Europe experienced following the breakdown of the Roman Empire in 476 ce. Alexander's death was sudden and his empire disintegrated into a 40-year period of war and chaos in 321 BCE. Dissension and rivalry soon afflicted the Macedonians. During that time, there was a major power struggle since the central administration of the empire collapsed and Alexander failed to assign an heir. This led to his generals battling each other to rule their own kingdom.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander knew that the offspring of these marriages would be rejected within both cultures, but he knew that this would only create loyal subjects that would have no choice but to serve him. Although, after his death, most of these marriages would only end up being rejected. But, Alexander only had the goal of achieving the perfect empire in which the Greek culture would far surpass the others. And of course becoming the only king in the world, this being due to his huge amount of ego. But, he did help improve the conquered empires, by which the Greeks had brought with them their art, literature and a bit of their own language. Which, heavily influenced those within the empires. It helped improve their education and even their literacy skills in their daily lives. The influence of the Greeks even went as far as taking over the former Persian Empire and replacing it under the same laws and policies that the Greeks abided by. The Greeks also in stowed their beliefs in their Gods. While, not much is known today about what laws Alexander exactly put into to place, there is still evidence of his spreading of the Greek culture. Thanks to Alexander, most of what is known today is due to the influence he and his army had upon those they conquered. He had modeled the other governments after his own, while spreading his culture along the way. And although, he is mostly known today through his military accomplishments, he still managed to reform and educate the people of his…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phillip was later assassinated and many believe that Alexander played a role in his demise. Alexander finally became King of Macedonia and fixed his attention on Persia. The Persian empire have had control of a large sum of territory to the East of Greece and were arguably the most powerful empire on Earth at the time.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In general, the four great military men of the West are Alexander, Hannibal, Caesar, and Napoleon. Alexander was the earliest one, he became the king of the Macedonian Empire at the age of 20, a year later he started the expedition to the Persian Empire, he conquered the Persia, Egypt, and northern India before 33 years old, and then dead on the way back .His influence on Europe is very large, affecting many of the great men later.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great was, in many ways, an amazing ruler. He was not afraid to take a chance on someone or something that everyone else had given up on, and he was prepared to risk his safety to help his men. Alexander also proved to his men that he was strong and that he was prepared to die for his cause.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page

    Many people think that Alexander the Great was truly great because of all his accomplishments, but not all of the things he did were great. He did lots of cruel things to people and animals just because he wanted to gain more power. Alexander has killed approximately 100,000 people only in four major battles (Alexander’s Legacy Doc E). Alexander was a prince who was born in macedonia of 356 BC. Alexander was very arrogant. He was taught by a philosopher Aristotle. He taught him subjects like, politics, sports, and warfare. Philip, Alexander’s father built the macedonian army into a deadly fighting machine, this sparked alexander’s interest and was eager to to lead the army. And Alexander got his chance to lead at the age of 20, because Philip…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be quite honest before this lesson I had always held the assumption that Alexander The Great was similar to that of Caesar; mainly in the sense that he was a general who gained power through conquest. Yet, to my surprise, I now know that Alexander was infact the son of a king, Phillip the second. Knowing this, I now view this discussion question a bit differently. There is no doubt that Alexander The Great was infact an influence character in history, but I wager his father deserves more credit than what common history gives him. The empire Alexander created both militarily and politically would, in my opinion, never occurred with the earlier conquest, and alliances his father set up. Simply put, the military and resources Alexander needed to begin his trek across the known world to the Greeks would have never happened without the alliances with the other powers Philip the second secured through political married and then latter conquest. Alexander very well could have amassed a military through the ways his father did, but the point is he did not have to do that in the beginning. Naturally, he would recruit new members to the military with ever conquest, but I believe saying this to answer a question on how Alexander created his empire’s army would be trival. However, the question itself is dually worded. The empire's military, as least for the beginning part of its creation would have been allotted to Alexander through what his father archived.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander ascended to the Macedonian throne. He soon showed his power when the large city of…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At last, Alexander the Great was a standout amongst the most-known individuals in Greek history to have vanquished a ton of land. It helped him spread his way of life, however it restricted the choices of other urban communities' way of life. In this way, it was useful for Greece, awful for the Near East urban communities. On the off chance that Alexander didn't vanquish so much, significantly more things could have been distinctive and there could've perhaps been significantly more societies now. Alexander the Great was a progressive and he exclusively changed…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian empire at its peak has long been seen as one of the largest wholes during the classical era, and few have rivaled its size. The land that Alexander the Great was able to conquer, however, was one of the few that served as an appropriate challenge. Around the time of 338 B.C.E through 323 B.C.E., Alexander's collected mass was a whole. Of a Greek origin, Alexander was taught by Aristotle, the great philosopher, and it can be inferred that he used the strategic methods learned, among other things, to assist him during his expansion. It was short lived, however, when he died of an unknown cause at an early age of thirty-three. Even though his empire crumbled, his legacy lived on. Multiple cities, strongly influenced by Alexander, erected,…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great came up with affective alternatives to help achieve his plan of winning the Battle of Gaugamela. Effective alternatives stimulate efficiency (Hultman, 2016). Alexander appeared to have more insight on how to make the most of his team. He knew that affective alternatives would be necessary to gain the victory because Darius of Persia had an advantage in the battle. Darius of Persia started the battle with a larger amount of soldiers, as well as, first choice of the battleground. Alexander the Great knew that Darius having this advantage would warrant him to consider all resources and strategies to gain the victory over the skirmish. Alexander organized a methodical game plan for his troops (Nassar, 2007). The writer feels…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The death of Alexander the Great on June 11. 323 B.C. continues to confound and frustrate historians not simply because it happening long ago, but because of the controversial matters 3. Charles the Great, or Charlemagne, was a shining beacon of hope in an otherwise bleak and corrupt European during its seventh and eighth centuries because of his helping to reestablish a sound rthat could have contributed to his poisoning, such as the possible betrayal of his subordinates or jealous leaders who despised Alexander for his successful conquests of Greece, Egypt, Asia, and India.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays