Preview

Majority Rule

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
368 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Majority Rule
What is the principle of majority rule? The constitution assumes the principle of majority rules and tries to protect from checks and balances. On the surface, the principles of majority rule and the protection of individual and minority rights would seem contradictory. In fact, however, these principles are twin pillars holding up the very foundation of what we mean by democratic government. Majority rule is a means for organizing government and deciding public issues; it is not another road to oppression. Just as no self-appointed group has the right to oppress others, so no majority, even in a democracy, should take away the basic rights and freedoms of a minority group or individual. Minorities -- whether as a result of ethnic background, religious belief, geographic location, and income level, or simply as the losers in elections or political debate -- enjoy guaranteed basic human rights that no government, and no majority, elected or not, should remove. Minorities need to trust that the government will protect their rights and self-identity. Once this is accomplished, such groups can participate in, and contribute to their country's democratic institutions Among the basic human rights that any democratic government must protect are freedom of speech and expression; freedom of religion and belief; due process and equal protection under the law; and freedom to organize, speak out, dissent, and participate fully in the public life of their society. Democracies understand that protecting the rights of minorities to uphold cultural identity, social practices, individual consciences, and religious activities is one of their primary tasks. Acceptance of ethnic and cultural groups that seem strange if not alien to the majority can represent one of the greatest challenges that any democratic government can face. But democracies recognize that diversity can be an enormous asset. They treat these differences in identity, culture, and values as a challenge

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe the decision of the people, equality, and freedom of speech are the most vital features of a democracy. The majority of the people’s opinions are expressed through modern democracy and implemented on the society.…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How does Susan Hill create tension and unease in the first 3 chapters of the novel,…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As defined in this class what do the terms ‘majority’ and ‘minority’ refer to? (understand that a primary difference is relationship to power; it is not about numbers)…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The counterarguments that I predict arising against the utilitarian view I have presented are twofold. The first argument would likely be that the trampling of minority rights is immoral. Followed by the argument that more people would be happy if we afforded minority cultures special rights to prevent the disenfranchisement of their rights by liberal neutrality and legal tolerance, therefore making them equal to the dominant culture.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite the assumption that the United States has attained full democracy, there are still many incidences of biases. The main motive for Banaji Mahzarin R. to write the book was to bring to light the biases that people keep in their minds or brains as well as showing how those bits of knowledge about individuals and about their skin color, education, age, and religion can manipulate behavior.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government believes that cultural diversity in the United States contributes to creative thinking, policy changes, new ideas and looks at laws, procedures, and policies that contribute to inequality and equality. There are some people that support the notion that laws protecting minority group are a direct result of cultural diversity, and these people are inclined to be against such…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The majority does not perform the greatest ability to protect all members of a society. In the case of Miranda v Arizona, the courts had to decide whether or not a man was deprived of his freedoms while in police custody. Basically Miranda v Arizona completely changed the way police apprehend and interrogate suspects. However it was not only Miranda, but many other instances where the majority has not protected all minorities. Vignera v New York was another similar instance where a suspect was forced to sign statements and an inculpatory statement, while being questioned by police, without knowing he was entitled to legal representation. In California v Stewart, local police held and interrogated the defendant for 5 days,…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Threat of Tyranny of the Majority not Strong enough to "Temper" the Spirit of Democracy…

    • 982 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consequently, vulnerable groups (such as minorities) are protected, ensuring that they have a voice and are not silenced. One great example what happens in the absence of proper human rights protection is how the Chinese people got their right to vote. At the turn of the 20th century, the Chinese people only got their right to vote only because of popular opinion, not because it was their right (CHRC, n.d.). While things went favorably for the Chinese minority, it could have easily gone the opposite way and the Chinese people would never have any voting rights had public opinion turned against them. The fact that the Chinese gained voting “rights” because of popular opinion shows how human rights were at the mercy of laws passed by the government. There is no doubt that an entrenched Charter of Rights and Freedoms would have ensured that the Chinese people would have gotten their right to vote, instead of leaving this precious right at the mercy of popular opinion. Nevertheless, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms was not the first of its kind; the Bill of Rights was introduced in 1960 with similar purposes. The Bill of Rights was used in 1970 (R v. Drybones) to strike down certain discriminatory provisions of the Indian Act (Radio Canada International, 2016). In this case, an Aboriginal was convicted for being intoxicated off a reserve, which was contrary to s. 94(b) of the Indian Act. However, he was acquitted after appealing as s. 94(b) was inoperative in the circumstances as it was conflict with the Canadian Bill of Rights c. 44 (Lexum, 1969). This was so as s. 94 rendered Aboriginals guilty while any person who was not an Indian would not have been punished, infringing on the right to equality before the law. Therefore, one can see that…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nature and importance of the problem were also a factor for consideration in designing the research design. This research stemmed from the problem, which states that there is an unequal representation in the political participation level among Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians (Liu et al., 2009). And that democracy and political representation require Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians to participate electorally and to be equally represented. The researchers of this study feel that this research is timely because it has political implications, for current matters as in the upcoming 2016 and 2020 elections (Henry, 2015). It is also extensive because it has far reaching consequences to minorities’ political involvement in the future. Social…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Woman's Suffrage

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Now days when you turn eighteen in the United States. you can vote in the election but that was not always true for woman. Before 1920 woman were not allowed to vote only men could. It all began in 1848, at the first woman’s rights convention in New York, and didn’t end until 1920 when the 19th amendment, which gave women the right to vote, was finally ratified and became a law on August 26, 1920. Many brave woman and organizations fought for the right to be considered equal to men. Organizations such as NWSA, founded by Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and AWSA, founded by Lucy Stone and Henry Blackwell. These people, as well as many others, took a stand so that woman could have the rights that they do today, the right to vote. Woman’s suffrage was one of the most influential things in history because it allowed men and woman to be treated as equals, and without it, America would not be where it is today.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    8. Majority Rule - Majority rule is the idea that at least one more than half of the total number of people has voted in a certain direction. Usually, majority rule is good when you are voting on something and need a quick solution to be presented.…

    • 5943 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Often a single document defines and commemorates an event or a moment in time that is of importance. The Declaration of Independence is the principal document that defines and commemorates the birth of the United States and the independence of our nation. The Declaration of Independence defines the right of the people to defy the established order, to change their government, and to throw off an oppressor. [1] The Declaration of Independence expresses America's foundation and independence and the basic freedoms that this nation strives to embody, such as "life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness". The important thing about the Declaration of Independence is not the document itself. It is the feeling and beliefs of a group of people that were speaking for a whole nation. The Declaration of Independence was written in 1776, but its message is timeless and still relevant today. The purpose of the Declaration of Independence was to declare and explain why the thirteen colonies were breaking away from Great Britain's control. The Declaration of Independence had a massive significance in political, social and financial issue.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Minority groups are subordinate groups in our society that have less control over their lives than do members of a majority or dominant group. Expectations of success, wealth and happiness are narrowed in society as a member of a minority group. By contrast, being in a majority group does not guarantee automatic possession of these ideals either.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Minority Rights In Canada

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In Canada it is imperative that we protect the rights of minorities, but only to an extent. Canada is country with a strong policy to accepting immigrants, standing up for statutory minorities (even non-statutory minorities), and supporting equality. However; we can only go so far to protect minorities and their rights before they infringe on the rights of the majority. The controversial language barrier (French/English divide), Racial and religious discrimination such like the aboriginal conflict…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays