Preview

Malingering: Military and Physical Fitness Test

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
757 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Malingering: Military and Physical Fitness Test
Malingering is one of the more serious offenses that a service member can commit. Covered under Article 115, malingering is defined by: * Feigning illness, physical disablement, mental lapse or derangement or * Intentionally inflicts self-injury; shall be punished as a court martial may direct.
A service member can also be punished under Article 134 – Self Injury without intent to avoid service and Article 80 – Attempts. Malingering basically means that any action taken by a soldier to willfully avoid duty will be punished by court martial or other UCMJ action. There are severe consequences for such actions, let alone the problems it will cause to the soldier’s unit and his or her fellow soldiers. The essence of this particular offense is by design an attempt avoid performance of any work, duty, or service which may properly or normally be expected of someone in the military service. Whether it is to avoid all duty, or even one small order or work detail, it is the purpose to avoid one’s duty which characterizes the offense. This can include things such as intentionally failing physical fitness tests to be chaptered out of the military and keep the same benefits of soldiers who complete their service honorably. By and by, the nature or permanence of a self-inflicted injury does not matter on the question of guilt, nor is the seriousness of a physical or mental disability when it is found or proven to have a malingering intent. Evidence of the extent of the self-inflicted injury or feigned disability may, however, be relevant as a factor indicating the presence or absence of the purpose.
The injury may be inflicted by nonviolent means as well as by violent means. This can be accomplished by any act or confession which produces, prolongs, or aggravates any sickness or disability. Meaning that a soldier, who says or does anything to keep a physical profile or willfully attempting to get chaptered out of the military will be punished under Article 115. Even

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lt Mcclane: Case Study

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In accordance with AFI 51-202 a Nonjudicial Punishment can only be imposed on an officer by a Colonel or higher. So for Lt McClane this decision must be pushed up to the Wing Commander, with your recommendations. The maximum punishment that the Wing Commander can impose is an LOR and thirty das restriction. If this is the course of action that is chosen, Lt McClane must be informed in writing of his NJP. He must be giving the opportunity to read it and sign it. Open being given notice of the NJP, he is allowed 3 working days to respond to the NJP, and he can seek counsel. If Lt McClane refuses to sign NJP, this issue can then be taken to a Court Material. Lt McClane should be offered this NJP with twenty-one days of the discovery of this offense, and the NJP should be started within eighteen days of it being offered. If the NJP is accepted it must be filed in an Unfavorable Information File for two years, per AFI 36-2907. Both the Article 15, UCMJ and LOR must be filed for two years.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Special Court Martial, Convicted in violation of Articles 86, 91, 92 of the UMCJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886,891 and 892 (1982) United States v. Collier, Jr., 27 M.J.806 (A.C.M.R. 1988),…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Awol Soldiers Summary

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another story on an AWOL soldier is when first arriving to Korea a SPC by the name of Jalen Davis, got in trouble for multiple violations such as fighting, drinking on duty, and sexting on a government phone. Davis was demoted to PV1 and received multiple ART 15's as punishment. He was also waiting for chapter paperwork to be approved. The next day after his chapter paperwork is approves starts out processing but never returns. Davis disappeared for two days. Davis was now an AWOL soldier. He went down town to a Korean hooker that he was in love with. Davis was out of money so when he went back the next day the girl called his 1SG to come get him. They locked up his civilian clothing thinking that would stop him for leaving, but he got away again. He went back to his Korean hooker after she took the rest of the money he had saved the girl called for him to be picking up again. This time they took away most of his military clothing so he could not leave but Davis got away, and went to see the girl. The girl called once again for him to be picked up. Davis was locked in is room after going AWOL this time. It came time for him to start clearing again he had two NCOs guarding him but Davis got away. This time when they found Davis they made sure he could not leave or get…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robert Bowdrie (Bowe) Bergdahl is a United States Army sergeant who left his post in Afghanistan 2009 purposefully and intentionally. The Bowe Bergdahl case is an odd case that sometimes does not make much sense. He will be facing court-martial sometime this year for is desertion and misbehavior. The Uniform Code of Military Justice is very similar to regular law, but has some adjustments that pertain to certain military rules and regulations. Bergdahl violated one of the most important rules and the first General Order, these orders are a soldier’s guideline on how to conduct themselves.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    AR 600-2 Analysis

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Being in the military we live by a different set of regulations and laws. In 1950 President Harry S. Truman signed into law the Uniformed Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The UCMJ allows the Commander to make the decision for serious and minor offenses. As a Non-Commissioned Officer (NCO) how do we address the necessity of punishment when a soldier commits an offense. AR 600-2 introduces us to tools that we as leaders use to focus the attention of Soldiers and inspire compliance with Army standards. Corrective Actions and Corrective Training,…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Article Eighty-six of the Uniform Code of Military Justice makes it a crime to fail to go to one's appointed place of duty at the time prescribed, to leave one's place of duty, or to be absent from one's unit without authority. Article Eighty-six or Absent Without Leave, states verbatim “Any member of the armed forces who without authority fails to go to his appointed place of duty at the time prescribed; goes from that place; or absents himself or remains absent from his unit, organization, or place of duty at which he is required to be at the time prescribed; shall be punished by court-martial may direct.” Being a certain member appointed for a specific duty at a specific time and place and not showing up or showing up late, whilst knowing of the appointed duty. And without proper authority skipping or showing up late. It is always important to be where you are supposed to be when you are supposed to be there. Even more so in the Marine Corps. Punishment for violating Article Eighty-six of the UCMJ is left to the discretion of the member's direct chain of command. Whether that be an NCO, Staff NCO, or Officer. The first violation is typically a verbal or written counseling, second a written counseling along with a specific form of deterrence such as: reporting in to the duty NCO every four hours through out the day, even in the members off time. Third violation will usually result in a much harsher punishment such as a Page Eleven, Sixty-one Zero-five, or Nonjudicial Punishment, Court-Martial, and Administrative separation from the service. If taken to Nonjudicial Punishment member could end up losing rank, pay, and be confined to restriction. It is all about accountability. Though normally accountability is an individual responsibility it may become a unit responsibility or the responsibility of a superior to ensure you are where you are supposed to be at the appointed time. Not only will punitive action be taken but your peers will be affected as well. Some may…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A2 OCR Law - Intention

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages

    (b) intending by the destruction or damage to endanger the life of another or being reckless as to whether the life of another would be thereby endangered; shall be guilty of an offence.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pms and Gundecking

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The possible consequences of “gundecking” are Article 92, Article 107, and Article 108. Article 92 states “Any person subject to this chapter who has violated or fails to obey any lawful general order or regulation. Having knowledge of any other lawful order issued by a member of the armed forces, which it is his duty to obey and fails to obey the order. Also, is derelict in the performance of his duties; shall be punished as a court martial my direct. The maximum punishment for Article 92 is dishonorable discharge, forfeiture to pay and allowances, and confinement for two years, or bad conduct discharge, and confinement for six…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ucmj Article 86

    • 3614 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Going further into failing to go to appointed place of duty is a as such. A soldier was appointed a certain time and place , that soldier was aware of it and the accused without authority failed to comply.…

    • 3614 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ____________________. Your actions are in violation of Article 86 of the Uniformed Code of Military Justice (UCMJ),10 U.S.C. 886. Continued misbehavior of this type may result in judicial punishment or non-judicial punishment under Article 15 of the UCMJ adverse administrative personnel actions. Potential adverse actions may include: written or oral reprimands, a bar to reenlistment, extra training, suspension or revocation of your security clearance, and involuntary separation under AR 635-200, Chapter 13, Unsatisfactory Performance or Chapter 14, Misconduct. The impact of adverse separation can be severe depending upon the type of discharge you receive. A dishonorable discharge deprives a soldier of all veteran's benefits and may deprive him or her of their civil rights. If separated for your duty performance, the least favorable character of discharge you could receive is an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Both may cause undue hardships in civilian life and may reflect on your eligibility for veteran's benefits, eligibility for reentry into the Armed Forces, and acceptability for employment in the civilian community.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    while on the subject of misconduct on duty, such an activity in any particular workplace can be considered grounds for disciplinary action such as I have received now, but on a much larger scale; much like un-employment. In other similar career paths like the Army, firefighting or caregiving, you might be assuming or thinking that you can get away with such an act and not get caught, and the truth is you might just slide by and make hast. On the flip-side however, such an act such as sleeping could lead to a death or any type of serious injury if caution is'nt practiced.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Notes Australia

    • 15899 Words
    • 64 Pages

    * Murder is under the “Fatal offences against a person- causing homicide” in the Crimes Act (s188, punishment (s19A)…

    • 15899 Words
    • 64 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Article 91 Essay

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Article 91 -“Any warrant officer or enlisted member who— (1) strikes or assaults a warrant officer, non-commissioned officer, or petty officer, while that officer is in the execution of his office; (2) willfully disobeys the lawful order of a warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer; or (3) treats with contempt or is disrespectful in language or deportment toward a warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer while that officer is in the execution of his office; shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    lying to an nco

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lying to a non commissioned officer can be punished by UCMJ action due to the following reasons. Article 91: Insubordinate conduct toward a non-commissioned officer (you failed to obey the order in this case the order to contact SGT Henshaw before leaving post and who I was going with) , punished by 1 year confinement, forfeiture of all pay and allowances (willfully disobeying an NCO's order). Article 92: Failure to Obey a Lawful Order (Sgt Henshaw ordered me to tell the truth, and I didn't), punished by dishonorable discharge, 2 years confinement, forfeiture of all pay and allowances (if the situation involved a general order). BCD 6 month confinement, forfeiture of all pay and allowances (for the failure to tell the NCO the truth). Article 107: False Official Statements (told a lie when asked of my whereabouts), punished by 5 years confinement, forfeiture of all pay and allowances . Article 134: Disloyal Statements (prejudicial to the good order and discipline), punished by 3 years confinement, forfeiture of all pay and allowances (statements needed). Article 134: False Swearing (you took an oath and then lied), punished by Dishonorable Discharge, 3 year confinement, forfeiture of all pay and allowances. Article 134: Obstructing Justice (you lied to hide wrongdoing), punished by Dishonorable Discharge,…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Insubordination is defined as when someone refuses to obey an order given by a person who has more authority than them. As stated in the UCMJ ,any warrant officer or enlisted member who, (1) strikes or assaults a warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer, while that officer is in the execution of his office; (2) willfully disobeys the lawful order of a warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer; or (3) treats with contempt or is disrespectful in language or deportment toward a warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer while that officer is in the execution of his office; shall be punished as a court-martial may direct. Article 91 and 92 of the UCMJ defines insubordination (Article 91) and failure to obey order and regulation (Article 92). Article 92 states Any person subject to this chapter who (1) violates or fails to obey any lawful general order or regulation; (2) having knowledge of any other lawful order issued by any member of the armed forces, which it is his duty to obey, fails to obey the order; or (3) is derelict in the performance of his duties; shall be punished as a court-martial may direct. (1) Violation or failure to obey lawful general order or regulation. Maximum punishment is dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 2 years. Violation of failure to obey other lawful order-- Bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 6 months.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays