Preview

Man vs. Machine Surplus Theory of Value Output

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1122 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Man vs. Machine Surplus Theory of Value Output
Mos 1
Steffan J Mos
02/24/13
ISF 100A essay 1
Prompt 1

Man vs. Machine Surplus Value output

Within society there has always been producers and consumers, those who work for the benefit of others to gain in return a medium of exchange of wealth and salary for personal consumption at a later time. But at what cost of these workers, what of the surplus or rather byproduct of labor that workers create for capitalists to make economic profit of the workers? Their labor-cost, according to nineteenth century German economist Karl Marx, is then able to be appropriated by Capitalist and in return allows then for economic profit/growth. This being the root of what we call capital accumulation, or the gathering of objects of value to increase wealth through concentration, allows Marx to pose then his thought on this unpaid surplus labor of workers. Karl Marx goes on to explain his theory of surplus value as a method of value a worker is weighed towards his or her employer. It is the difference of the total use of said worker and their wages being paid by the employer. However, this surplus value created by the employee is not determined by the actual output a worker producers but rather measured by the wages the employee is given by the capitalist. The amount of value that is generated by the worker is the byproduct or rather the excess of the labor produced by the worker. Marx, being socialist sees this use of exploitation of the work force for capitalists gains as wrong and poses methods of altercation to benefit the worker. Marx gives us the posed solution of mechanization
Mos 2 of the work force to allow for efficiency and conservatism of the labor force. Meaning that surplus value could then be caused by the difference between the labor time embodied by the machine and the time that the machine takes to operate. We see with this method of mechanization as disabling of human factor of production and rather it allocates the human function to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    men are separated from their creative faculties. When there’s increased dol, (car assembly line) they just do that all day. (or smith’s dol in pin factory. Efficient. But its disasterous for the human pschy.) ppl become alienated from their work product. Marx’s problem: value equals market value. Labor…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx describes that through capitalistic means of production, the worker sinks to the level of a commodity, and is objectified as an object that can be bought or sold. Marx illustrates that on the basis of political economy the worker is viewed as a commodity that can be bought and sold for wages; in addition, that the worker becomes wretched spiritually, of health, and of intelligence (438). The workers are seen as simply replaceable with no sort of individual identity, they are dehumanized and become alienated from their true selves. When an individual becomes objectified they are no longer viewed as themselves, but as an object that lacks all the personal characteristics that he or she truly possess. Instead of judging individuals based off of their personal traits and characteristics, they are only judged on the sole fact of how much labor value and products that they are able to produce to the owner of production. Through a political economy, the workers are robbed of their health and individualism making them alienated to their true essence. When an individual is not able to live a healthy or fulfilling life in which they are able to participate in the activities that he or she enjoys, they become alienated from their…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx is the first to state that capitalism is based on the accumulation and hyper-consumption of commodities. As such, commodities are meaningful both because of their monetary/exchange value and because they reflect the social relations of production that went into making them. In The Fetishism of the Commodity, Marx says that the inherent problem with the capitalist structure is that society tends to focus only on the monetary and exchange value of the commodity. Marx uses the word “fetish” to describe commodities and show how they cause society to fixate on their monetary and exchange values, while ignoring the exploitative nature of the market that produced them. To illustrate his point, Marx uses the example of wood used by a worker to create a table. “The form of wood, for instance, is altered, by making a table out of it. Yet, for all that, the table continues to be that common, every-day thing, wood” (1). While a commodity, in this case a table, is only valuable because of the labor used to make it, it is difficult to place a specific monetary value on labor quality, so capitalist society treats commodities as if they has intrinsic value. The value of the labor is…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx believed the factory system had resulted in a “cash economy”. Owning the means of production, the bourgeoisie kept wages low in order to get cheap supplies, improve the technology of their factories and increase their markets. According to Marx, dependency on low wages had reduced factory workers to “wage slaves,” deprived them of the satisfaction that should be found from working and made it more difficult for the lower class to provide for their basic needs. He wrote, “The work of the proletarians has lost all individual character…and all charm for the workman. He becomes an appendage of the machine.” (Paragraph 22)…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx and Adam Smith

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In contrast, Karl Marxl reasoned that workers would be broken by any capitalist, or factory owners, because he believed that a capitalist system provides an advantage for the rich and a disadvantage for the poor. The rich would get richer and the poor would get poorer. Furthermore, the “capitalist” is always in a better position to negotiate a low wage for his workers, he argued. One of his notable and more arguable theories claims that the value of a good or service is directly connected to the amount of labor required for its production. Interestingly, Karl Marx also had his own drastic, political ideas that were far away from those of Adam Smith’s.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The workers, who own no means of production of their own, must seek jobs in order to live. They get hired by a capitalist and work for him, producing some sort of goods or services. These goods or services then become the property of the capitalist, who sells them and gets a certain amount of money in exchange. One part of the wealth produced is used to pay the workers ' wages, while the other part (surplus value) is split between the capitalist 's private takings (profit), and the money used to pay rent, buy supplies and renew the forces of production. Thus, the wealth has been consumed reproductively for the capitalist and unproductively for the worker, because the value of the wealth he exchanged for the means and substitutes, and, therefore, lost it forever. The only way to get money for the worker is to repeat the exchange of his labour power to wage with capitalist. Therefore, according to Marx, “capital presupposes wage-labor; wage-labor presupposes capital. They condition each other; each brings the other into existence.” (Marx, 1849). A worker produces not only…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 is a compilation of thoughts regarding German economic and political concerns. Karl Marx conceives capitalist society’s responsible for the estrangement of the laborer. The capitalist mode of production ensures that man’s labor necessarily restricts him from acting in accordance with his humanity. The theory of capitalism diverts him, in the sense that it provides false hope for betterment, while the structure of capitalism, in coercing him to fluctuate his priorities away from that of an autonomous social being towards that of a collective individual, debases man’s special bond to his species- what is self-contradictory is it asks him to abandon his deepest bond to humanity, while at the same time offering him the hope of becoming a better social being. As a result of this contradiction, Marx affirm, man’s labor alienates him from himself and from his species. Yet I am here to argue, although man may feel alienated from himself and product of work, man has the choice, option to free himself from notions of capital enslavement. Within this essay, I will define estrangement of labor and the four main dimensions of alienation, evident in a capitalist society. I will discuss how alienated labor comes about as a result of capitalism and why said labor is not socially commend. Furthermore, I will elucidate on what non-alienated labor would be like, compared to alienated labor, in a capitalist society. Ultimately, I will annotate why Marx’s critique of capitalism is unfound and how labor under capitalism is in fact, engaging.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844) Marx states the worker is alienated from the product of his work. He makes it for his employer,…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx vs. Weber

    • 2538 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The basis to Marx's theory in which capital is created is based on writings of his works; Manifesto of the Communist Party, Capital, Volume One and Wage Labor and Capital. Through these readings, it can be derived that his main thesis is to understand history, you must understand class struggles. The classes of owners of the means of production and employers of the wage laborers, the bourgeois, have the will to obtain capital in the easiest means possible. On the contrary, the classes of wage laborers, the proletariat, have no means of production of their own, and are reduced to selling their labor power in order to sustain their lives. These classes have sustained themselves through history and are evident in modern society. "The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with clash antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones." This explains that even though our society has new technology, different political and economical circumstances, the existence of these two classes are still in existence.…

    • 2538 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Conflict vs Consensus

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Karl Marx described societies as constant competition between the labor force and the capitalist regime. The financially dominant capitalists develop new forms of technology that must be produced by the workforce they employ. As business monarchs must compete with one another’s technology, they search for ways they can better gain the advantage. To maximize profit, the capitalists will often decrease their laborers’ wages, causing a rift in the laborer’s expected paycheck. To maintain the lifestyle they’re accustomed to, the laborer must work more hours, or produce the same results in less time. This monetary accomplishment gives the laborer a false consciousness. False consciousness is a sense of pride that exists within the worker, when in reality they are an exploited pawn in the capitalist’s chess game. The worker greater competes against their peers as well as themselves while the leader…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx Vs Adam Smith

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As introduced earlier, Marx also used labor as a criterion for determining the value of goods, but to him, it was incomplete. As seen above, Smith considered the direct amount of trouble to obtain a good to be its real value. What Marx adds is the secondary cost in that the actual (physical) labor is just one of the factors that needs to be considered. “What, then, is the cost of production of labor-power? It is the cost required for the maintenance of the laborer as a laborer, and for his education and training as a laborer” (Marx, Chapter 4). Marx raises a valid point, that more than just the labor needs to be considered. Labor alone doesn’t accurately depict the real value, because according to Marx, more than just raw labor was needed to create the good. Raw labor without any training or education is essentially useless, and laborers need sustenance to be able to provide…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx believed that the poor were working their fingers to the bone to create value for society, while the rich simply siphoned off a portion of that value, which had been created by the poor. The rich do this without putting any effort into creating this value or their own value. In order for society’s productivity to be maximized, rich people’s syphoning off of a share of production must be done away with. Instead, the means of production (factories, stores, natural resources, etc.)—which rich people owned and used in order to siphon off poor people’s productivity—ought to be owned by the people themselves as a collective group. This prevents the rich from using their ownership position to syphon off a portion of society’s productione. Now, the people would continue to do all the producing, but the results of production would benefit only the people. In other words, each member of society must do what he or she can to produce the good and services society…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Flaws of Marxism

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages

    At the turn of the 19th century, an unprecedented amount of change had because of the Industrial Revolution. The concept of slavery in its typical terms had been abolished. Society itself had drastically changed. The population had more than doubled in Europe. Due to the Enlightenment era, philosophers had reduced God to a realm that does not describe the way our world works, and rationalism had taken its place. The dynamic between the peasant and the landowner had transitioned to the worker and the factory owner. Some of the same abuses continued to occur. Wealth and money, because of the system known as capitalism, became the means of all work. Realism had taken the place of the romantic, idealist philosophers, and the more contemporary philosophers of the 18th and 19th century defined the way our world operates through the realities in which they perceived. One philosopher in particular, Karl Marx, saw the system of capitalism as the root of evil in our world and as a hindrance of individual life and creativity. Although humans are producers, and capitalism is created through the production of labor for wealth. In our period of history, capitalism has alienated the human being. Although he rejected idealism, Marx, ironically, created an ideology that can only realistically exist in theory and not in true practice. Marx’s ideology is, and during his time in history, implausible because of the nature of human beings. Marxism is inherently flawed because of an imaginary struggle he views as inevitable, which in actuality is avoidable. In order for one to see the implausibility of Marx’s ideology, we must examine certain aspects of Marxism to note its problem areas.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx’s Das Capital not only revealed the exploitation surrounding the extraction of surplus value, he as well revealed the degree and ratio of exploitation involving the labour power of the workers. In this direction, he maintained that that surplus value can be categorized into “Absolute and Relative”. With this, Marx gives an analogy of how the value of labour power is used in extending capital. A school master is a productive labour or his labour power becomes of value when he finds himself in a school factory, that he must ensure that teaching and…

    • 2899 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays