Preview

Managers: Classical Management Functions

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1251 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Managers: Classical Management Functions
Management has existed since the early days of humanity, Egyptians building pyramids and the Chinese irrigation systems etc. Classical management writers rose in the time of the industrial revolution in Europe and emphasized on a more formal approach to management. But since the beginning of the implementation of the managerial work, it has been consistently unclear as to what is the nature of a manager’s work? This question has been the basis of numerous texts and discussions over the years. Stephen J. Carrol and Dennis J. Gillen (1987) have tried to answer this question to the closest possibility in terms of practical implementation by comparing and analyzing the works of different scholars.

The classical management functions as per Fayol (1949), define a managers work to be the one pertaining to planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling. Over the period of time, multiple managerial books and academic journals have been based on the subdivisions of these five principles as per the theories of Miner (1971). But Mintzberg (1975) questioned Fayol’s classical managements functions and devised his own typology, which, like the classical functions, was gradually implemented in the academic world, but the two were never integrated in any study. Even other author’s like Kotter (1982) and Stewart (1974
) have published their own typologies, which do not agree with the classical management functions. It has been clear due to such observations that author’s are having some difficulty in handling and converging these diverse perspectives on managerial work into one model of study. This academic paper elaborates more on the works by Fayol and Mintzberg, while addressing the key issue of whether the classical function is still relevant in today’s organizations or if Mintzberg model was more accurate in defining the theoretical description.

Henri Fayol was the first person to identify elements or functions of management. His five divisions of a



References: Brooks, I. (2009). Organisational behaviour: Individuals, groups and organisation. . (4th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited Carrol, S., & Gillen, D Fayol, H. (1949). General and industrial administration. London: Sir Issac Pitman & Sons, Ltd. Fells, M. (2000). Fayol stands the test of time. (pp. 345-360). Kotter, P. (1982). The general managers. New York: Free Press. Lamond, D. (2004). . a matter of style: reconciling henri and henry. 42(2), pp. 330-356). Miner, B. (1971). Management theory. New York: Macmillan. Mintzberg, H. (1975). The manager 's job: Folklore and fact. (pp. 49-61). Pryor, G., & Taneja, S. (2010). Henri fayol, practitioner and theoretician – revered and reviled. (pp. 489-503). Stewart, R Wren. (1994). The evolution of management thought. (4th ed.). New York: NY: John Wiley.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Compare and contrast the traditional roles of managers presented by Fayol’s early writings with more contemporary research of Stewart and Mintzberg. Support your answers with examples.…

    • 1976 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Contemporary Management

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Carroll and Gillen evaluated and examined the different Classical Management functions such as; planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, and controlling which were introduced by Fayol (1949) in respect to how useful they are in describing managerial work. One (1) of the key responsibilities that managers have is be best described through planning. This ensures future outcomes the business are met through strategic, operational and tactical planning. Managerial work also involves task assignment, implementation of plans, delegation of duties and ascertaining what it is that actually needs to be carried out. This is mostly fulfilled through organising, which is an element of classical management functions.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Management Reflection

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Management is a concept that dates back to early civilizations. Those which paved the way for the concept we know today, entailing many figure heads boasting several principals and ideologies. The concept, that being the process of dealing with or controlling things and people has been and will continue to be a necessary component of organizations. Contemporary management in organizational context is constantly changing and can be looked at under a broad scope; by singling out some theories and foundations to these processes we can grasp ideas as to how these changes come about and how they can be changed in a beneficial way.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Managerial Perspective

    • 2975 Words
    • 12 Pages

    A manager is essentially a person that gives direction, provides leadership and decides how to use resources to accomplish organizational goals (Daft, 2008). As a person having been in the workforce for almost twenty-five years, I can say with experience, that managers and the methods they use to obtain organizational goals can make the difference between success and failure of a project and even an organization. A managerial philosophy is something that all managers develop over time as a result of their experiences in the workplace. Over the last twenty years I have been exposed to a variety of business and managers that have helped me shape my personal managerial philosophies that I currently employ on the job. Before I get into the exact philosophy that I apply in the workplace it is important to know a few aspects about my past experience and some of the roles I have played to truly understand the rationale for my personal managerial philosophy.…

    • 2975 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    in order to appreciate and probe the management and its ensuing problems and the man.agerial roles and events, ete. Some years ago, an author who attempted to classify the various "schools" of management theory called this situation "the management theory jungle" [1]. Certainly, it could be observed that many different approaches were diversely categorised by different authors. Familiarity with the approaches to management analysis can help one appreciate many insights, ideas and help one avoid re-examining previously known ideas. Figure 1 summarises the various approaches to management analysis in the foUowing categories [2]. As seen in Figure 1, one of these approaches is Managerial Roles Approach that will be strived to explain in the following section. 2. TIIE MANAGERIAI.. ROLES APPROACH The Managerial Roles Approach which is one of the newer approaches to management analysis has been popularised by Henry Mintzberg. Mintzberg has given this approach higher visibility although many researchers have studied the actual work of managers. This approach is related to the Work-Activity SchooL. The Work-Activity School of management deals with the actual activities of managers which are analysed systematicaUy and conclusions are drawn only…

    • 2694 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The classical school of management has sought to define the essence of management in the form of universal fundamental functions. These, it was hoped, would form the cognitive basis for a set of relevant skills to be…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    In order to define the term management theory and to critically evaluate classical and human approaches it is also important to discuss what shaped the thinking of management theory development.…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper attempts to evaluate the usefulness of the classical management functions perspective for describing managerial work and…

    • 2884 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Henri Fayol, like Frederick Taylor also contributed significantly to classical management theory. Fayol’s suggested that there were five main roles of managers, these being planning, organising, commanding, coordinating and controlling. Taylor began his career as a common laborer and went up the management chain. Henri Fayol on the other hand started his career as an engineer and moved up to a manager (Wren, 1994). Both their views of management differ in this aspect.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Harold Koontz (19098-1984) and Cyril O’Donnell (1900-1976) defined management as “the function of getting things done through others”. They furthered Fayol’s ideas and sought to provide a conceptual framework for the orderly presentation of the principles of management.…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henri Fayol biography

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Henri Fayol (* 1841 in Konstantinopel- Istanbul; † 1925 in Paris) was a French management theorist whose theories concerning scientific organisation of labour were widely influential in the beginning of 20th century. Often associated with Frederick Winslow Taylor, his theories deal with the organisation of production in the context of a competitive enterprise that has to control its production costs. Fayol was the first to identify the four functions of management: planning, organizing, directing, and controlling, although his version was a bit different: plan, organize, command, coordinate, and control. He believed that the number of management principles that might help improve an organization's operation is potentially limitless. Henri Fayol graduated from the mining academy of St. Etienne (École des Mines de Saint-Étienne) in 1860.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Early theorists such as Henri Fayol (1841 – 1925) described managerial role as planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling. In the early part of 20th century, his theory did help managers to manage more effectively (Mind Tools Ltd, 1996 – 2013). However, Fayol might have overlooked the external factors that might affect managers. Then, in 1973, Henry Mintzberg published his own theory of management roles. His approach is somewhat different from Fayol’s as he highlights the importance of building interpersonal relationship. This is more relevant to today’s organizational structure as most are operating under ‘open system’, where external factors are open to affect managers (Daft, 2001). Thus, Fayol’s theory is more relevant to be perceived as functions instead of roles in today’s management idea.…

    • 1889 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    One such author, Henry Fayol (1841 – 1925), known as the father of modern management, was Europe’s most distinguished management author and the first to develop a general theory of management. He maintained that management is “to forecast and to plan, to organize, to command, to co-ordinate and to control”. The basis of his theory is that organizational activities can be classified into technical, commercial, financial, security, accounting or managerial activities.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Management Theories

    • 4498 Words
    • 18 Pages

    We have much pleasure in enclosing our Term Paper on “some selected theories and concept of management” for the course ‘Advanced Management’, under your kind supervision and cooperation.…

    • 4498 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics