Thus, that would mean that all parties whether they be the Democrats and Republicans, or third parties, such as the Green party and Libertarian, would all have to receive the same amount of funding. Ignoring the obvious problem of establishing what constitutes as a party to receive equal funding, if this were to occur it would create a competitive and efficient market. Requiring all candidates regardless of party to acknowledge negative externalities that were occurring or risk becoming obsolete. I say this because now companies cannot pay their candidate into office to prevent negative regulations from occurring due to the political playing field being leveled out. For example, imagine the difficulty that candidates would have at stating global warming was not an issue if member of the green party had equal reach and power; and were thus able to easily distribute resources to prove this statement to be ludicrous. However, once again a flaw occurs in deciding what constitutes a party that get equal
Thus, that would mean that all parties whether they be the Democrats and Republicans, or third parties, such as the Green party and Libertarian, would all have to receive the same amount of funding. Ignoring the obvious problem of establishing what constitutes as a party to receive equal funding, if this were to occur it would create a competitive and efficient market. Requiring all candidates regardless of party to acknowledge negative externalities that were occurring or risk becoming obsolete. I say this because now companies cannot pay their candidate into office to prevent negative regulations from occurring due to the political playing field being leveled out. For example, imagine the difficulty that candidates would have at stating global warming was not an issue if member of the green party had equal reach and power; and were thus able to easily distribute resources to prove this statement to be ludicrous. However, once again a flaw occurs in deciding what constitutes a party that get equal