Preview

Manila Lodge No. 761 vs Ca

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1028 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Manila Lodge No. 761 vs Ca
MANILA LODGE NO. 761 vs CA
ARTICLE 1431
MANILA LODGE NO. 761, BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF THE ELKS, INC., petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, CITY OF MANILA, and TARLAC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, respondents. (G. R. No. L-41001 September 30, 1976)
TARLAC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, petitioner, vs. HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, CITY OF MANILA, LODGE NO. 761, BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS, INC., respondents.(No. L-41012 September 30, 1976)
|THE CASE two cases are petitions on certiorari to review the decision dated June 30, 1975 of the Court of Appeals that the property subject is a "public park or|
|plaza." |
|FACTS |
|On June 26, 1905 the Philippine Commission enacted Act No. l360 which authorized the City of Manila to reclaim a portion of Manila Bay. The reclaimed area was |
|to form part of the Luneta extension. |
|Subsequently, the Philippine Commission passed on May 18, 1907 Act No. 1657, amending Act No. 1360, so as to authorize the City of' Manila either to lease or to|
|sell the portion set aside as a hotel site. |
|On July 13, 1911 the City of Manila, affirming a prior sale dated January 16, 1909 cancelled 5,543.07 square meters of the reclaimed area to the Manila Lodge |
|No. 761, Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks of the U.S.A. |
|Manila Lodge No. 761, BPOE, subsequently sold the said

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    from the decision of the Commission to the District Court of Bernalillo County pursuant to s 59-9-6(K),…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Deleon, Hector, S. Philippine Constitution. 2008 Edition. LL.B., University of the Philippines. Philippines; 2008…

    • 2575 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    case study qwe

    • 8239 Words
    • 27 Pages

    MANILA PRINCE HOTEL, petitioner, vs. GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM, MANILA HOTEL CORPORATION, COMMITTEE ON PRIVATIZATION and OFFICE OF THE GOVERNMENT CORPORATE COUNSEL, respondents.…

    • 8239 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    laws of the Philippine Islands with principal office in Cabanatuan, Nueva Ecija, and that the individual defendants…

    • 2717 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ISSUE: Whether or not the decisions of Municipal or Metropolitan Courts in barangay election contests are subject to the exclusive appellate jurisdiction of the COMELEC considering Section 9 of R.A. No. 6679.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    almocera vs ong

    • 3629 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Before Us is a Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure which seeks to set aside the Decision1 of the Court of Appeals dated 18 July 2005 in CA-G.R. CV No. 75610 affirming in toto the Decision2 of Branch 11 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Cebu City in Civil Case No. CEB-23687 and its Resolution3 dated 16 November 2005 denying petitioner’s motion for reconsideration. The RTC decision found petitioner Andre T. Almocera, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of First Builder Multi-Purpose Cooperative (FBMC), solidarily liable with FMBC for damages.…

    • 3629 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Salita vs. Calleja Digest

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts: This is a case for injunction filed by Pacienca Salita to prevent the sale by the Sheriff of manila of a house insatisfa ction of a judgment for a sum of money obtained by defendant-appelle Eduardo Calleja in another case against Fancisco Domingo, admittedly the original owner of the said house.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Floresca vs. Philex Mining

    • 17818 Words
    • 72 Pages

    This is a petition to review the order of the former Court of First Instance of Manila, Branch XIII, dated December 16, 1968 dismissing petitioners' complaint for damages on the ground of lack of jurisdiction.chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library…

    • 17818 Words
    • 72 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Moran vs Ca

    • 3913 Words
    • 16 Pages

    This is a petition for review on certiorari of the decision of the respondent Court of Appeals which ordered petitioner Isabelo Moran, Jr. to pay damages to respondent Mariano E, Pecson.…

    • 3913 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    oblicon

    • 29196 Words
    • 107 Pages

    as Civil Case No. 658-95 for “Sum of Money with Prayer for a Writ of Replevin” [1] before the Metropolitan Trial Court of Pasay…

    • 29196 Words
    • 107 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    appealed for probation under the provisions of Act No. 4221. Judge Tuason of the Manila CFI…

    • 5722 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Resolution with Body 0 0 Master's Directives 0 0 Executive Order 0 0 Memorandum Order 2 1 Memorandum Circular 3 2 Philippine Benevolent Missionaries Association, Inc. SEC Reg.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In City of Manila v. Laguio, Jr.,1 the Court affirmed the nullification of a city ordinance…

    • 7772 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Labor

    • 2869 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The Court ruled that both Article 287 and PAL’s retirement plans are alternative in nature and the retired pilot only is entitled to which have the superior benefits. Article 287 of the Labor Code is applicable only to a situation where: there is no CBA or other applicable employment contract providing for retirement benefits for an employee, or if there is a CBA or other applicable employment contract providing for retirement benefits for an employee, but it is below the requirement set by law. The rationale for the first situation is to prevent the absurd situation where an employee, deserving to receive retirement benefits, is denied them through the nefarious scheme of employers to deprive employees of the benefits due them under existing labor laws. On the other hand, the second situation aims to prevent private contracts from derogating from the public law. The determining factor in choosing which retirement scheme to apply is still superiority in terms of benefits provided. Thus, even if there is an existing CBA but the same does not provide for retirement benefits equal or superior to that which is provided under Article 287 of the Labor Code, the latter will apply. In this manner, the employee can be assured of a reasonable amount of retirement pay for his sustenance.…

    • 2869 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Takad Carnapping Case

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF TUGUEGARAO CITY SECOND JUDICIAL REGION Branch III…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays