What was the case: Marbury was a soon-to-be appointed justice of the peace when Adam’s presidency came to an end, resulting in his successor, Thomas Jefferson denying credibility of the appointments because they were not completed during the time of Adam’s presidency. Jefferson’s Secretary of State, James Madison, was asked to allow the commissions.
Decision: The Supreme Court denied Marbury’s writ of mandamus and he was denied the commissions.
Reasoning: Congress cannot expand the Supreme Court’s power past Article three, and the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus.
Significance: The significance of this court case is that it affirmed the judicial review and helped make the judicial branch co-equal …show more content…
Reasoning: A law that deems a property unconstitutional established under a previous law is unconstitutional.
Significance: This was the first time a state law had been overturned by the Supreme Court.
McCulloch vs. Maryland
What was the case: Maryland enacted a law that requires all banks without a charter from the state to pay a tax and they are prohibited to print money without stamped paper from the state. McCulloch, a cashier in a branch of the Second National Bank in Baltimore, did not pay the taxes, resulting in the suing of McCulloch by Maryland. McCulloch questioned the constitutionality of the act.
Decision: McCulloch won.
Reasoning: The Bank of the United States is permitted to establish a branch in any state, the state has no power.
Significance: This case gave the United States government implied powers ontop of those listed in the constitution.
Dartmouth College vs. Woodward
What is the case: The charter was to Dartmouth College by the King of England in 1769 and had specific purposes for its establishment. In 1816, New Hampshire’s state legislature passed a law changing the school from a private school to a public school. The school argued that the state did not have the right to do