Preview

Mark Howard's Argument Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
580 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mark Howard's Argument Analysis
The Mark Howard View of Rationality of Belief in God
When I now claim to believe in the rationality of God, I mean that the question is settled to my satisfaction. I do not have any doubts—after pondering the arguments, the balance of evidence and argument has a definite tilt. Although I do not claim that the Mark Howard view of the rationality of God would make a compelling case for why someone else ought to believe, I now am better able to articulate an argument that provides something for them to think about. I have moved beyond the realm of automatic, unchallenged acceptance of an inherited belief and am now better able to communicate the faith that Peter admonishes us to be able to give an account of. Admittedly, this is not the end of my inquiry.
I do not believe that it is possible to “prove” the existence of God in the scientific sense. However, based on the arguments reviewed in favor of the rationality of God, I can enumerate reasons to believe that God exists and is active in the universe.
Among the arguments considered in this paper as rational evidence for belief in God, I found the ontological argument to be the most difficult for which to muster support. Of course I agree that …show more content…
Why am I here? Where am I going? The universe has purpose; and the First and Sustaining Cause gives my life meaning. When I observe the order and intricacy of the world at every turn, I am convinced that there is a Master Designer—the First Cause of the cosmological argument and the logical conclusion of the ontological argument. This Intelligent Designer, this First Cause, the One being than whom none greater can be imagined—this God is the best answer for the objective moral facts about the universe. This God is the ultimate authority, the One who is greater than everything and everyone. This God rules over all and deserves my highest praise, my unreserved worship, and my total
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    General Argument Analysis: Teresa Watanbe And Jason Song
    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page

    General Argument Analysis: Teresa Watanbe And Jason Song

    The general argument made by Teresa Watanbe and Jason Song in their work, College Students Confront Subtler Forms of Bias: Slights and Snubs, is that victimhood is occurring in colleges around the U.S. More specifically, Watanbe and Song argues that students are getting effected by slight comments which hurt their feelings or emotions. They write, “minor slights harm student performance, mental health and work productivity,” In this passage, Watanbe and Song is suggesting people feel down in the dumps and they can't get back up because of all the negative energy to goes towards them. In conclusion, Watanbe and Song's belief is…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Ted Galen Carpenter's Argumentative Analysis
    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Ted Galen Carpenter's Argumentative Analysis

    The question of should the United States seek to remain the “indispensable” country? Creates discussions for former U.S. Senator Hilary Clinton and published scholar and fellow member of the Cato Institute, Ted Galen Carpenter. Each orator discusses their position with reasons supporting their stance on the matter.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stephen Feldman's Argument Analysis
    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page

    Stephen Feldman's Argument Analysis

    I believe Stephen Feldman’s argument is very accurate. I think his arguments are eye opening, especially his arguments about religious holidays. Around Thanksgiving time there are a lot of Christmas decorations. For individuals in outgroups it would be difficult living in a world of cultural imperialism where everyone assumes you practice the same religion as them. I also agree with the author’s main argument, the separation of church and state does not equally protect all American’s religious freedoms. I realized this when the author mentioned the case of Thornton v. Caldor Inc. the main argument in the case was to allow employees to not work on their religious Sabbath, which ever day that might be. The Supreme Court approved the Christian…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mickey Hess's Argument Analysis
    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mickey Hess's Argument Analysis

    Mickey Hess looks at the use of multiple identities by rap musicians to obscure the conflicting contradictions between authenticity and marketability. Hip hop, having budded from a culture of oppression against African-Americans, grew as a medium of resistance. Hess cites Tricia Rose’s words, stating that hip hop, in the context of resistance, wages an “ideological warfare with institutions and groups that symbolically, ideologically, and materially oppress African Americans” (pp.298). Therefore, the experience of oppression and life in the projects is central to most rappers’ identities as hip hop artists.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Paley's Teleological Argument For The Existence Of God
    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Paley's Teleological Argument For The Existence Of God

    The existence of God has been a popular and yet ongoing debate for many years now. There are many arguments that argue for God’s existence just as there are many arguments against God’s existence. This paper will argue for the proof of God’s existence according to William Paley’s teleological argument. The teleological argument is often described as an argument which stems from either design or intelligent design, but this can be considered as misleading.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tim Wise's Argument Analysis
    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Tim Wise's Argument Analysis

    Tim Wise had a different childhood than most, he was raised by the phrase "Race matters." As a pre-schooler he was sent to a mostly black school and learned to respect black authority figures. This resulted in him being more racially aware while growing up. His main argument was that racial inequality still exists today. As he went through college, he became very involved in a group that advocated for better rights for people in Africa. Several weeks later, he was asked what he had done to address racism in his own city, New Orleans. He then realized he hadn't done anything in his own town. He began working for the next twenty years to advocate for racial equality still exists. The argument is made that white people are blind to their advantages and privileges. According to Wise, white privileges is built into our system and has helped us without us knowing. White people in the US have had many more privileges compared to people of color, it's just built into the foundation of our…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Detailed Worldview Outline
    • 551 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Detailed Worldview Outline

    Introduction: In this outline you will learn about who God is, and the nature of our universe. Does us living in this world have a purpose, or is it just wasting our time? Growing up we are set around a worldview of beliefs, and stories, and are set to believe that those are true. This world allows for a diversity of worldviews, but which one is correct or incorrect?…

    • 551 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cosmological Argument From Evil Essay
    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cosmological Argument From Evil Essay

    Outline the Ontological argument for the existence of God and consider the view that, while it may strengthen a believer’s faith, it has no value for the non ....…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kalem Cosmological Argument Proving The Existence Of God
    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kalem Cosmological Argument Proving The Existence Of God

    Consistently from the dawn of human existence, the idea of “God”, or simply the questions of the place from whence the human body has come from forced any individual to consider the religious value or idea of God regarding God’s responsibility for every piece of matter in which makes up life. One of the most critical arguments that claim that there must be a God is the Kalem Cosmological argument, which uses the universe’s mere existence or the beginning of the universe’s existence to claim that whatever has a beginning, must have a cause, insinuating that the cause of the universe’s beginning is in theory, God. Though with creative intellect in further questioning it’s impossible for one not to question that the Cosmological argument may be correct in theory, but does the cause of the universe have to be God? Throughout this paper, I’ll be focusing on the argument that God’s existence does not have to be the direct cause of the begging of the universe, nor does the cosmological argument actually prove the existence of God for that matter.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Teleological Argumentative Analysis
    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Teleological Argumentative Analysis

    Throughout the course of time, many philosophers, dogmatic religions and even individual human beings themselves have tried to prove the existence of God. The recurrent question that constantly arises is whether or not you can prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking alone. To that, the answer is no. It is not possible to prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking as you also need to incorporate aspects of faith, but rational thinking helps solidify your beliefs pertaining to God and leaves the answers we cannot conceive rationally up to faith. You cannot understand something outside of your existence rationally because you cannot experience it or see it; you can only theorize, believe and trust in it. You will never be able to reason what you have no knowledge of. In this essay, I will argue that in…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Flaws in Saint Anselm's Approach on the Ontological Argument
    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Flaws in Saint Anselm's Approach on the Ontological Argument

    Thanks to Saint Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury1, the ontological argument was born in the early 1100’s. The ontological point of view, according to St. Anselm, describes God as “a being than which no greater can be conceived”.2 St. Anselm concluded that if such being failed to exist, another even greater being could be conceived that does exist. This argument would be illogical, as no being can be greater than the greatest being. Therefore God must exist. As you can see, St. Anselm’s ontological argument attempts to prove the existence of a greater being but his argument contains two flaws within it. The first can be seen in his definition - or lack thereof - in the idea of conceiving. The second flaw lies in what sorts of inferences Anselm asks of his reader. Later in this essay I will defend my view against the charge that St. Anselm’s argument is a priori argument and not a posteriori.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    response to Being an Atheist
    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages

    response to Being an Atheist

    In fact McCloskey places the bar even lower by referring to the “proofs of” rather than “arguments for” God’s existence, thereby overstating the Theist’s claim. With respect to the “proofs” for God’s existence that McCloskey attempts to deal with, namely the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments, McCloskey offers trivial objections that are easily answered. With respect to arguments for God’s non-existence, McCloskey offers the logical form of the problem of evil which, while rich in rhetoric, does not contain enough logic to necessitate its title. McCloskey ends his article with a pragmatic justification of Atheist, stating that Atheism is more comforting that Theism; a point that is stark in its irrelevance.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Ontological Argument
    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Ontological Argument

    Through the ontological argument, Anselm seeks to prove that God exists and he attempts to refute the fool who says in his heart that there is no God. This fool has two important characteristics: he understands the claim that God exists and he does not believe that God exists. Gaunilo plays the role of the “fool” and challenges Anselm’s ontological argument. I will argue that Anselm’s response to Gaunilo’s attack is not adequate because it does not address the issue of certainty, which plays an important role in Gaunilo’s objection. First, I will explain, in greater depth, Anselm’s ontological argument. I will then elaborate on why Gaunilo denies that than which nothing greater can be conceived exists in the understanding. Lastly, I will argue why Anselm’s response to Gaunilo’s attack is insufficient.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    William James Belief In God
    • 1689 Words
    • 7 Pages

    William James Belief In God

    After William James’s students “got well imbued with the logical spirit” (William James 130) they began to question his belief in God because it could not be proven through logic and he had no evidence to back up his claim. This inspired him to write his essay “The Will to Believe” in which he attempts to explore and refute Pascal’s logical reason to believe in God, and William Cliffords argument that any claim made without strong evidence to back it is a morally wrong claim, despite what the truth may be (William Clifford 126). Since a belief in God cannot be proven or disproven with logic, many philosophers have tried and failed, James want to argue that a genuine belief in God can still be reasonable without strong evidence.…

    • 1689 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ontological Argument Research Paper
    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Ontological Argument Research Paper

    When considering an argument for God, the ontological argument is one of the most intriguing. Mainly because of it's a priori nature, differing from other popular theological arguments which are a posteriori such as the cosmological argument. This means the ontological argument is understood to be true analytically on its own terms without an appeal to experience. Because it does not depend on empirical findings, it - if it is valid - is absolutely certain. Furthermore, the argument intends to prove a supreme being, one which is good and omniscient, and not merely a vague “first cause.” In this essay i shall explain the argument formulated by Anselm, as well as the advancement put forth by Descartes.…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics