Preview

Market Failure in Environmental Pollution and the Attempts to Extend the Market

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1288 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Market Failure in Environmental Pollution and the Attempts to Extend the Market
Market Failure In Environmental Pollution and the Attempts to Extend the Market.

The idea of giving the environment a price has been a controversial issue as to whether introducing economics will inevitably save it, but with that idea considered, the environment has been increasingly difficult to place a value on. By using environmental valuation methods such as, contingent valuation (willingness to pay), opportunity costs and hedonic pricing, the measurement of environmental gains and losses can be represented in economic terms and by summing up these gains and losses an estimate pricing of the environment can be placed (Beder 1997).

The environment is constantly subjected to market failure, where a market is incomplete or is failing to do what it aims to (failure to protect the environment) (Kolstad 2000), and appropriate measures are continuously being devised to extend the market and prevent the further degradation of environmental and natural resource problems.
An environmental market failure well represented in attempts to be fixed is the emissions of pollution into the atmosphere contributing to the enhanced green house effect (Tietenberg & Lewis 2009). This is due to the demand of pollution by the environment being negative, because clean air is much preferred than heavily polluted air, yet there is a huge supply of pollution into the market from industry, thus causing market failure (Brehmer et al. 2007). In the aim to reduce current levels of pollution, there has been the introduction of efforts such as command-and-control (CAC) procedures and market based instruments (MBI’s) effect (Tietenberg & Lewis 2009). The benefits and fall downs of each and how they intervene in a failed market for pollution will be discussed and to determine if they can completely extend the market and solve the issue.

Command and control
‘CAC’ methods are based and prioritized on developing emissions standards (Tietenberg & Lewis 2009). These methods are



References: Beder, S 1997, ‘The Environment Goes to Market’, Democracy and Nature, vol. 3, pp. 90-106. Biscoe, JP 2008, Emissions Trading Law, Land and Environment Court of New South Whales, Commentary at seminar on Emissions Trading Law Organised by NSW Bar Association, Government of Australia. Available from: <http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/lec/ll_lec.nsf/vwFiles/Paper_4Dec08_Biscoe_Emissions_trading_Law.pdf/$file/Paper_4Dec08_Biscoe_Emissions_trading_Law.pdf>. [29 April 2012]. Brehmer, E, Hyland, D, Fritschner, C, Wertz, M 2007, Environmental Economics- volume 1: The essentials, Environmental Literacy Council. Available from: <http://www.enviroliteracy.org>. [28 April 2012]. Kolstad, CD, 2000, Environmental Economics. Oxford University Press, New York Market Based Instruments for NRM Change 2011, Market Based Instruments-FAQ, Government of Australia. Available from: <http://www.marketbasedinstruments.gov.au/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=g%2BA81CV%2BkC8%3D&tabid=78&mid=780>. [18 April 2012] Storfer, S 2004, Can Market Forces Solve Environmental Problems? Neoclassical VS. Australian Analytics, University of Central England, Birmingham, U.K. Tietenberg, T & Lewis, L, 2009, Environnemental & Resource Economics, Pearson Education, Boston. White, B 2012, Markets for Pollution – taxes, lecture notes distributed in Environmental Economics 1120 at the University of Western Australia, Crawly on 5 April 2012.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Polluter Corp

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Polluter Corp. is a company that operates three plants in the United States. They make different cleaning products which are sold to customers. The U.S. government sells or gives out emissions allowances to companies, including Polluter Corp., which determines a set amount of pollutants and greenhouse gases a company can let into the environment. These are given out to help discourage pollution by companies. “EA’s” are assigned a year that a company can use in, and they also can be bought and/or swapped with other EA’s from different companies, as long as the swapped EA’s have the same usage year. When the usage year for the EA is over, they are returned to the government. If the company emits more pollution that the allowed amount on the EA, then the company will pay a fine. Polluter has recorded their EA’s as intangible assets.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Treasury (2011), Strong Growth, Low Pollution - Modelling a Carbon Price, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra…

    • 2211 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assess the view that the environmental problems caused by the disposal of rubbish can best be dealt with by market forces rather than by government intervention…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    · How economic analysis can be used to determine the most effective and economical regulations or policies (see Ch. 28 of the text) to help solve the environmental concern…

    • 450 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Putting a Price on Carbon: An Emissions Cap or a Tax?” Yale Environment 360 7…

    • 2115 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    • develop standards in the GHG market, including for contracts in carbon trading, the financial accounting of greenhouse gases, and the validation and verification of emission reduction projects;…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reading Response Answers

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages

    a. “Population growth, wasteful and unsustainable resource use, poverty and failure to include in their market prices the harmful environmental costs of goods and services.” (p.15)…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Carbon Tax Essay

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The introduction of the carbon tax in Australia is derived from the serious environmental issue of climate change. According to The Economist (2011), Australia's emissions measured on a per capita basis are the largest of any developed country, mostly because Australia produces approximately 80% of its electricity from coal which is one of the sources of energy directly measured by greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, considering the adverse consequence of climate change, an effective long-term solution is required to achieve fundamental shifts in consumer and business behaviours (Hoque et al., 2010). The increasing concerns about the carbon tax can also be attributed to its profound impacts on the market in which individuals and businesses are involved. Clarke (2011) claimed that the carbon tax will have significant effects on markets for goods involving carbon intensive inputs as well as on the actual markets for these inputs and for their substitutes and complements. Also, it cannot be neglected that the introduction of the carbon tax as a climate change policy is a reflection of the Australian Government’s objective to cut greenhouse gas emissions. Specifically, the Australian Government has raised its progressive target to cut its carbon emissions by 80% of their 2000 levels by 2050 (The Economist, 2011).…

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hubbard, R. G., Garnett, A. M., Lewis, P. & O’Briend, A. P. (2013). Essentials of economics (2nd ed.). Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Australia.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "The ‘polluter pays principle’ states that whoever is responsible for damage to the environment should bear the costs associated with it." The Polluter Pays Principle (PPP) is one of the internationally recognized principles that influence the shaping of environmental policy at both the national and international level. As one of the environmental principles that have developed ‘from political slogans to legal rules,’ it is also increasingly reflected in national and international law. It is seen and analyzed both as a principle of environmental economics and as a principle of environmental law. In environmental economics, it is discussed as an efficiency principle of internalization of environmental costs. As a legal principle, it is usually treated as a principle for the allocation of the cost of pollution prevention, and for liability and compensation for environmental damage. In general, it is regarded as an important and ‘right’ principle in the perspective of environmental protection. It is often mentioned together with other major environmental principles such as the precautionary principle, the principle of prevention and the principle of integration. In general, it is regarded as an important and…

    • 5033 Words
    • 144 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The relationship between economic growth and the environment is controversial. Traditional economic theory posits a trade-off between economic growth and environmental quality. Since the early 1990s, however, the rapidly expanding empirical and theoretical literature on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) has suggested that the relationship between economic growth and the environment could be positive and hence growth is a prerequisite for environmental improvement.” (Lee et al. 2005)…

    • 3583 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION IN THE MARKET Content • Market failure and government failure • Competition policy • Public ownership, privatisation, regulation and deregulation of markets • Notions of equity • The problem of poverty • Government policies to alleviate poverty and to influence the distribution of income and wealth • Cost Benefit Analysis Market Failure • Markets fail for a number of reasons: – Externalities (social costs and social benefits) – Monopolies – Imperfect information – Factor immobility – Due to equity issues – where there is a disparity between resource allocation Government Failure • This occurs when government interventions either increase the severity of market failure or cause a new failure to arise • This occurs when policies: – Have damaging long term consequences – Are ineffective – Cause more problems than solve problems Methods of Government Intervention • • • • • • Taxation Subsidies Buffer Stocks Pollution permits State provision Regulation Causes of market failure • Inadequate information this may result from: – Not doing a cost benefit analysis – Insufficient information on long term costs / benefits • Conflicting objectives: – Governments tend to think in the short term rather than the long term therefore fail to consider long term costs / benefits – If governments control an industry they may be more concerned with their interests than those of the public – If the policy interventions lead to negative consequences for consumers / producers e.g. higher income tax Causes of market failure • Administration costs – these may be too high to reap the benefits of the intervention • Political self interest – politicians may do what is best for them thereby resulting in inefficient resource allocations Regulatory Capture • Regulatory capture this is where a government regulatory agency who are meant to be acting in the public interest instead becomes…

    • 1970 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "The social benefits of maintaining the supply of clean air will exceed the private benefits of doing so". A statement which nowadays we all know is true but to actually achieve it is another. As far as the market mechanism is concerned we can see through the different market approaches towards sustainability, an extension to private property rights, environmental charges and green taxes how the market can benefit the eradication of pollution however the problems and consequences of these mechanisms highlight the extent how much of a common resource the environment is to us, the alternatives to market based mechanisms like the government also show problems in their attempts to eradicate pollution. So how efficient are the market mechanisms is eradicating pollution, are they just short term measures to gain "a green "identity for private profitability or are they working?…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (Back Ground)Climate change, a consequence of unchecked pollution, has become a controversial issue in most nations in over the world. Among countless others, carbon emission is one of main causes of this problem. The effects of climate change are extremely dangerous not only on the environment but also for economy (Australian Conservation Foundation, 2013). Consequently, these effects have strongly influenced human life. Finding the solution to prevent the serious effects of a changing climate is the goal of most countries. Putting a price on carbon is considered as the best way to minimize consequences of climate change (Nader, 2013). (OUTLINE) Many people believe that putting a price on carbon can result in an increase of unemployment rate and that it is not an effective way to eliminate carbon emission level in the environment (Murrell, 2008). However, the huge revenue from carbon tax and carbon trading is a considerable benefit for a nation economic development. Furthermore, putting a price on carbon has a significant impact on preventing climate change (Richard, 2012). (THESIS)Therefore, putting a price on carbon should be continually applied for the protection of the planet and developing the economy.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Environmental policy in the UK covers a wide field of government activity from releases of industrial wastes to air, land and sea, to energy consumption, urban transport, urban planning and regeneration, building conservation, genetically modified organisms, to the protection of flora and fauna as well as the countryside. So why should governments implement these policies? The rationale behind implementing environmental policies is to avoid ‘market failure’; market failure is where an individuals' pursuit of self-interest leads to bad or catastrophic results for the society as a whole. There are a few types of market failures that justify the government’s actions and some of these are protection of public goods which can be in the form of “common pool” resources like fauna, forests, and fish stocks or “common sink” resources fresh air ; addressing transboundary problems in the case of climate change, ozone depletion and marine pollution; the irreversibility of limited…

    • 1719 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays