Preview

Marley V. Almy Case Brief

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1210 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marley V. Almy Case Brief
Arshiya Qasba
20141036
B.A LLB section ‘A’
Case: McGuire v. Almy CASE BRIEF

Facts: Mcguire, a nurse (P) was hired to take care of Almy (D), a mentally unfit person. One day while D was locked up in the room, he became violent. P entered the room and saw D holding the leg of a chair in her hand as if she was going to hit someone. The P tried to grab it from D. D struck the P with it and injured her. P sued D for charges of assault and battery.
Procedural history: Initially the lower court gave its verdict in favour of D. This decision was later reversed by the Supreme judicial court of Massachusetts and the verdict was given in favour of P.
Issue : Can an insane person be held liable
…show more content…
For a person to be liable for an intentional tort he should have an intent to cause injury, even if there is no injury, the establishment of the fact that there was an intent to cause an injury is sufficient to hold a person liable. Hence the D is liable for charges of assault and battery. Verdict was delivered in favour of the P in the sum of $1,500.
Ratio Decidendi : For a person to be liable for his or her torts, he must be capable of considering the intent. The jury established that the D while striking the P with a piece of furniture was well aware that his action would result in causing injury to the
…show more content…
The P was aware of the fact that the D was physically well but mentally unstable. The P had been taking care of the D since fourteen month and during these fourteen months there had been a few incidents when the D became violent. One day while D was locked up in the room she got a violent attack and started damaging the furniture in the room. The D warned the P not to enter the room or she would kill her. In order to control D, the P still went inside the room, she thought D might harm herself. At this point of time, she witnessed D holding the leg of a chair in her hand as if she was going to hit someone with it. The P tried to grab the piece of furniture from her hand but the D struck her with it causing injuries to the P. The Plaintiff then sued the D for charges of assault and battery. The verdict which was delivered was in favour of the P. D made an appeal against the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Facts: Judd approached the defendant in an attempt to calm him. The defendant then punched Judd in the face. A brief fight ensured between Judd and the defendant during which a shelf with ceramic mugs fell on the floor and shattered. Doucette, Anderson and Potkaj attempted to break up the fight. Anderson and Potkaj grabbed Judd by his arms to restrain him while Doucette came up behind the defendant and wrapped his arms around him to stop the fight. The defendant broke free from Doucette and attacked Judd again. Judd freed himself from Potkaj and Anderson in response to the defendant’s attack and punched the defendant again. The defendant then picked up a kitchen knife with an eight inch blade from the counter and strode six feet from the counter toward Judd, swinging and stabbing with the knife.…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Procedural History: Lower court entered a directed verdict for Dr. Turk b/c there was an absence of evidence that he intended to inflict personal injury…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law 531 Case 5.1

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rules: The case was adjudicated on the basis of negligence law. Negligence is “the omission to do something which a reasonable man would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do.” Among others, negligence law takes into consideration: duty of care, breach of duty of care, injuries caused by defendant’s negligent act(s), and the likes. (Cheeseman, 2013). A particular negligence law considered during this case was negligence per se.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Nevada, 1996991 P. 2d 1183People in the United States commit crimes and make up excuses why they should not be held accountable for a crime. Insanity and temporary Insanity have significant differences. One might ask themselves is there really any meaningful difference? During the history of our court system there has been many significant court decisions which address the controversy topics of insanity and temporary insanity as it relates to criminal procedures. One of the most significant court decision is Miller Vs State Supreme Court of Nevada, 1996 991 P.2d 1183.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    White V. Gibbs Case Study

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The plaintiff’s counsel, Mr. Walsh and Ms. Babbitt, argued that the defense should not be granted summary judgment and that the case should move to a trial. The plaintiff’s counsel argues that it would have been impossible for the bartender to not recognize that Mr. Hard was visibly intoxicated. They also argue that Mr. Hard’s intoxication induced the reckless behavior that led to the death of Mr.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal Studies Report/ Essay

    • 2942 Words
    • 12 Pages

    This case is an example of a sentencing decision where the judge considered the principles listed in section 3A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), when mental illness is causally connected to the commission of an offence.…

    • 2942 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mr. Welch Case

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The purpose of this essay is to review and analyze a case of criminal law to make a determination of the possible homicide offense(s) that the defendant may be charged with. The case at hand is dealing with an estranged husband, Mr. William Welch, who gets into a verbal altercation with his wife, Mrs. Renee Welch, and her friend, Mr. Ben Powers. This verbal altercation starts with the verbal altercation and later leads to Mr. Welch shooting and killing Mr. Powers. At the trial, Mr. Welch claims that the killing was an act of self-defense, but the jury does not agree and finds him guilty of a homicide offense. The job at hand today is to break this case down into the facts, issue, and rules to properly analyze and conclude what offense(s)…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Missouri in 1975. This case is brought to the Supreme Court for review in 1969 where Drope, the Petitioner, and his acquaintances are charged with assisting in a rape and kidnapping of his wife. Once indicted the petitioner files a motion in order to obtain psychiatric evaluation and further treatment; this request is quickly denied. Once on to trial, Drope does not try to deny the claim against him however; his wife attests to acts of strange behavior, anti-social behavior, and recalls an incidence in which he tried to murder her the Sunday before the trial begins. Two days into the trial Drope shoots himself and is hospitalized unable to return, the court decides to continue on the basis that his absence was on this own accord. The case was closed with a jury finding him guilty and sentenced to life in prison. Once sentenced he immediately filed an injunction asking for another trial do to the fact he was deprived of his constitutional rights after not being given a mental competency hearing prior to or during trial. This case is seen by the same judge that has just sat through the previous trial. This motion is discarded upholding the ruling of the previous court, which this verdict is held up in the Missouri Supreme Court as well. Once heard by the Supreme Court they find that there should have been a mental competency hearing ordered prior to trial due to overwhelming evidence of mental instabilities. His suicide attempt should have also caused for a hold on the trial in order for mental competency to be reviewed at that point. Petitioner’s attorney asks for a recess at the time of the shooting and is denied. The court is ordered to proceed without him there; the Supreme Court finds this to be another oppression of his constitutional rights. This is a very good example of the mental competency evaluation and the importance that it plays for patients. Some patients should be in mental rehabilitation’s but are…

    • 3102 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduction: The insanity defense has been used for many years and believed to began around the 1720’s where the first formal defense was used in a court in 1724. Judge Tracy, the judge that ruled over the first case coined a term “The wild beast standard” that states “for someone to be insane he must be totally deprived of his understanding and memory, and not know what he is doing anymore than an infant, a brute, or a wild beast” (Neville, 2010, pp.3-4). After the Daniel M’Naghten case, a man who attempted to kill a prime minister due to his belief that the prime minister was conspiring against him ended up killing the secretary, there was a new rule many states began to follow. After M’Naghten was found insane by multiple experts because he was unable to know the difference of right and wrong therefore he was acquitted of all charges (Neville, 2010, p. 5) a rule was developed labeled after M’Naghten.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In scenario number 6, the story of the case is that Dr. Smithson, a neurologist sufferes from paranio and delusions of grandeur. He believes that he is a great pharmaceutical chemist and in doing so, he discovers a “miracle cure” for Alzheimer’s and believes that the drug which includes bleach and arsenic which help people dealing with such memory loss. He prescribes this “cure” to 20 patients with dementia. In the end, ten of the patients die and the rest are hospitalized with serious sillness. He is charged with second degree murder and urged to accept the plea pargain for not guilty by reason of insanity.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One very important issue in this case and many civil lawsuits is negligence. Negligence is when there is a failure to use reasonable care which results in injury or damage to another. It also asks who is responsible for one’s injury. In this case, Mrs. McKoy claims her injuries were caused by T & J’s negligent behavior. In order to prove negligence, T & J must be guilty of five elements: duty of due care, breach, factual cause, proximate cause, and damages.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good morning your honor and ladies and gentlemen of the jury, today is the day that the defendant in Edgar Allen Poe’s “ The Tell-Tale Heart” is proven to be insane; using the McNaughton rule the caretaker should be placed in a state hospital for the criminally insane. The McNaughton is a standard to be applied by the jury, after hearing medical testimony from prosecution and defense experts, It states that a presumption of sanity, unless the defense proved otherwise.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The author of this paper argues several reasons why the insanity plea should be changed or either eliminated. The reasons are considered and supported by evidence. The conclusion states that insanity should be altered or eliminated for the safety and well being of society.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us Law

    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The criminal justice system and modern science approach the question with interestingly different perspectives. The M'Naghten rule allows little room for negotiation of the crime details. Essentially, the defendant is declared either sane or insane; the defect of reason from a brain disease makes them either right or wrong. Advances in the field of neuroscience indicated that certain mental diseases were caused in part by factors outside the control of the individual inflicted with the disease and the fact that medication could be used to successfully alter one's behavior was a scientific breakthrough.…

    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To this day, only five states deny the defendant of the use of insanity defense. The insanity defense has such a firm historical and moral origin that provide fairness to defendants who suffer from mental disorders. It is important that the government and the public to treat them with consideration; provide them with the treatment that suitable for the individual’s illness to make them better in hope of release them back into the community when they are no longer a threat to the public rather than to confine them in prison and let them…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics