Milton argues that the main purpose allowed for divorce is adultery and that it is not nearly as important as a couple’s incompatibility. In Paradise Lost, Milton intends to “justify the ways of God to men”. He proposes that man’s disobedience results in the loss of Paradise. He is clear to define the fault of all downfalls and therefore is careful to justify the purpose and need for lawful divorce. In “Doctrine of Discipline and Divorce,”Milton argues that if a married couple is forced to remain together for life in an un-happy marriage that it is truly an offense to the dignity of God’s creation. Therefore an incompatible marriage is not of God’s choosing. So then if Christ is to be taken as condemning all divorce, except for that of adultery, and re-marriage is considered adultery, then the earlier law of marriage has been contradicted. Not only has it been convicted of adultery but God is then considered to carry inconsistencies and is therefore unfair to the human race. The “Doctrine of Discipline and Divorce” directly challenges the doctrine of eternal marriage as well as the warrants of divorce. With this said, Milton strongly supports that incompatibility should be considered lawful grounds for divorce with the ability of both
Cited: Blasi, Vincent. "Milton 's Areopagitica and the Modern First Amendment". Yale Law. 05/12/08 . Milton, John. "Doctrine of Discipline and Divorce". Complete Poems and Major Prose. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 2003. ---. "Paradise Lost". Complete Poems and Major Prose. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 2003. Sirluck, Ernest, ed. Complete Prose Works of John Milton, vol. 2. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1959. Van Den Burg, Sara. “Women, Children, and the Rhetoric of Milton’s Divorce Tracts”. Early Modern Literary Studies 10.0 (May 2004): 4.1-13