“‘All happy families are alike, all unhappy families are unhappy in its own way’ is the first line of Anna Karenina and, like any self respecting concierge, I am not supposed to have read it … for although common people may be sensitive to great works though they do not read them, literature, in the presence, cannot aspire to the lofty…
Since the beginning of written history, marriage is portrayed as a sacred vow by almost all religions and peoples throughout the Earth while adultery is almost always looked upon as wrong. Marie de France was one of the few female writers in medieval times which made her very influential and well respected. In her book titled “The Lais of Marie de France,” she gives the reader a look into the affairs and adultery that was going on in the medieval courts. It seems Marie de France does not particularly agree with adultery, but her style of writing leads the reader to see that it is not so bad, depending on the situation. It is almost as if she separates the lais into two distinct groups. The first of which are…
“Against Love”: immediately controversy is conveyed by the title of Laura Kipnis’ article on modern relationships. The reader is put on the defensive as Kipnis starts her argument with strong metaphors attacking one of the most basic human interactions that we see as natural and embrace without question. Namely, love, a word held in superposition between complex and simple. Kipnis argues it has been overrated and too much is sacrificed in the pursuit of making it last. Defining her own terms that apply to most relationships such as “advanced intimacy” and “mutuality” she provides a new perspective on old notions. Her tone throughout is consistently sarcastic but make no mistake, Kipnis is addressing a real issue on what we value as a society. Descriptive language is Kipnis’ fishing line that keeps you reading, often creating vivid and objectionable images that no one can avoid cringing at. Concepts surrounding love and the ideal couple change from age to age and from culture to culture but Kipnis doesn’t disregard this. She compares today’s norms to historical precedence as she identifies the shift from focusing on the convenience of financially organized marriages to the achievement of unending life-long love. Kipnis’ article presents a fascinating argument by proposing an idea…
In the essay “The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love”, Stephanie Coontz discusses the change marriage has made among the different cultures around the world and how it went from being an act that was necessary to something that was done for personal joy and fulfillment.…
Kate Chopins short story , “The Story of An Hour”, describes Mrs. Mallard as being ienslaved in an idealistic marriage during the nineteenth century. Mrs. Mallard, unlike the stereotypical women of the time, tastes the momentary sweetness of freedom when she hears the false news of her husband’s death.…
In William Goldman's “The Princess Bride”, the representation of love and marriage has challenged my values, through the unidealised reasons to why couples get married, the long-term unromantic relationship between Buttercup’s parents and the rather fast development of Buttercup and Westley’s love.…
Kate Chopin’s creation of the frail hearted Mrs. Mallard enlightens through irony and twists, about the servitude and acceptance of fate women in the nineteenth century faced regarding marriage. A life of independence outside of the constraints of marriage was a fantasy for women like Mrs. Mallard. When she is finally offered the opportunity and it was taken away from her abruptly, it leads to her literal heartbreak. Mrs. Mallard’s death showcased her unwillingness to return to her life of limitation that she’d been longing to escape, the irony of her broken heart, the exemplification of the lifestyle of women of the era, as well as the bittersweet undertone of marriage.…
The year of 1866 can be seen to have been a turning point in the Tsar’s policies becoming more reactionary and reversing many of the changes his reforms had brought. The reforms had been put in place in an attempt to propel Russia out of its increasingly backward state; as much as reforms such as the emancipation of the serfs, greater freedoms and opportunities in education and relaxation of censorship occurred with good intentions, much opposition arose. This came alongside the Tsar’s own personal problems, accompanied by increasing pressure from both events of the time and individuals.…
She called her husband " good, honest man" and yet "flunkey". It is not so hard for the readers to realize that she more likely respected her husband rather than loved him. Even though the character did not state this fact, it could be guessed easily. That was how the author used dialogue in which the facts about characters are revealed by studying the way they talk. The same technique was used to depict Anna's feeling toward her marriage. "I don't know what he does, what his work is, "( Yarmolinsky, 779). She felt isolated and lonely. Yet, Anna knew that she was a wife and that she should be responsible for that title. She felt guilty for her relationship with Gurov. She was afraid that what she had done might degrade her status. This is again described through her conversation with Gurov " now I have become a vulgar, vile woman whom anyone despise"( Yarmolinsky, 779). As she received a letter from her husband, Anna "made no haste to go" "( Yarmolinsky, 779). Studying the way the characters react to their circumstance the readers can go further inside the characters' consciousness. Those details were showing details in which…
In the story "The Lady with the Dog" by Chekhov is an obvious love story from the very beginning. It is known that Dmitry is a womanizer but when he first lays his eyes on Anna you can almost feel the smirk on his face of surprised happiness. It was just something a little different that he has never felt before, even though he tries to be somewhat arrogant about it. The story is very emotional and it brings a loveless, stiff marriage on both ends to life. This is nothing special, a loveless marriage seeing as lifeless marriages were very common during this time. The parents of the potential mates usually arraigned marriages and it is made out to be more of a business deal than a loving union between two people. If marriage were not put together as a business deal than it was more of just being the right thing to do. You had to be married eventually or you were looked upon as an outcast. A marriage could also put you into a higher social position weather it is for the man or the woman. As sad as it was these two people were in marriages where they ultimately had to tell themselves they loved each other when realistically they had learned to love one another. To me that is the whole point of the story. These two people had learned to love and have not actually fallen in love until now. These two people are for the first time finding themselves falling in love not with their significant other but with someone else (each other). That makes thing more complicated because it was not forced but natural so they could not deny or hide it this was happening weather they liked it or not. You know reading this story that what these two people are doing is morally wrong which is what Anna is dealing with pretty much throughout the whole affair. At the same time you were kind of disappointed that this couple (in some way that is what they became married or not) were separating and going their own ways back to the lives they want so desperately to get away from. There is almost…
Coontz’ article explains that as far back as the 1100s love was not present at the start of a marriage; it was either factored in or developed afterwards. In the thirteenth century, adultery was widely accepted as a form of love which is very different from today’s world. In the 1500s and 1600s, marriages were arranged by parents and if their “loyalty was not paramount…they were sometimes beaten” (Coontz 383). During the 1700s thru the late 1800s sexual loyalty was not even considered important; in fact many cultures have allowed mates to seek sexual gratification outside of marriage. It was not until recently in the late 1900s that people began to marry because of their love for each other. Coontz shows the comparisons of different cultures and their reasons to marry.…
Since the dawn of civilized society affairs have been seen as something that is immoral and wrong. When The Lady with the Pet Dog was written in 1899, cheating was wrong then and now, and is one of the lowest things you can do. Although many claim cheating is wrong, these awful practices are becoming something more common and somewhat acceptable. Many times it seems as though it is the man who cheats, yet when the role is switched the man is still blamed for the woman cheating. Cheating becomes acceptable because people tend to justify their actions, and in doing so it leads people to believe it was an “okay” thing to do. The Lady with the Pet Dog uses the relationship created between Anna and Gurov to create happiness and make us feel…
Women in the nineteenth century were powerless in decision-making. They belonged to their husbands or their fathers and were considered nothing more than possessions. Desiree is just like those women. When Desiree is old enough to marry, a well-known man named Armand Aubigny falls deeply in love with her. Chopin describes his affection that he feels for Desiree as sudden and deep, the way every Aubigny fell in love (242). This shows both the irrational and spontaneous personality of Armand. According to scholars, the marriage negotiations between Armand and Desiree’s father are far more like a transfer of power, instead of celebrating Desiree becoming an adult (Koloski 117). This proves that nineteenth century women had no say in their own…
Thousands of years before, males are the dominant of their families, and their wives are just their appendants. These changes shift women’s emphasis from families to the whole communities. As well-known, women are much emotional than men, which means, they can bring more “love” to society. The word “love” means morality and peace. Just as the example given in D.Kistof and WuDunn’s essay that, “women are the key to ending hunger in Africa” (p.211). women’s power is more than benefiting economic, it at the same time disseminates their thoughts to public, something that men cannot think of. Whereupon, the inadequacies of society have been fixed by that. That is the key to the morality and to perfect our world which is a progress due to capitalism. However, everything has two sides, and the problems are always inevitable. The meaning of “love” changes simultaneous with the diffuses of morality. This shift to a family side is the changing ideas about being “good parents”. While shifting to society is the changing of the importance of everyone’s lives. As Hochschild discusses, “Family and community life have meanwhile become less central as places to talk and relate, and less the object of collective rituals” (p.186). When discussing family, it always comes with a whole that everyone is bounded with each other. The bound is called “love” and it used to be the…
While the role of women in society is a very controversial topic, we can all agree that the theme of “a perfect wife” is one that goes back centuries, but over time it has changed a great deal. During William Shakespeare's time, also known as the 16th century, women did not have the same freedoms they do today. The “perfect wife” was one who was soft-spoken, obedient, and knew that their main purpose in life was to serve men. In William Shakespeare’s Othello, Shakespeare criticizes the unjust standards that were set for women, and their devotion and perceived inferiority to men.…