Dr. J. Onega
EH 101
22 March 2013
Marriage Equality
It is unbelievable that our American Society is still having a debate about same-sex marriage. By denying same-sex partners the right to marry, the United States government is discriminating against them and their ability to access the social, legal, and economic benefits available exclusively to lawfully married couples. Banning same-sex marriages is nothing more than a violation of civil rights and the Supreme Court has already ruled that separate can never be equal. The Fourteenth Amendment to our nation’s constitution prohibits discrimination against a particular group of people because of their race or religion, however, homosexuals are denied the right to marry based on their sexual orientation. Same-sex couples face a number of unfair disadvantages due to the fact that they cannot legally marry and this situation must be remedied. Same-sex marriages should be legalized in every American state. The number one reason most people disagree with same-sex marriages is that all major religions consider homosexuality a sin and that marriage is traditionally between one man and one woman. The First Amendment of the American Constitution protects every human being’s religious beliefs, or lack thereof. Marriage by the state is a secular activity. A marriage license originates from the county or municipal clerk, not a church, and the officiant acts as a representative of the state regardless of their religious background. There can be no religious argument against gay marriage allowed and the government cannot make laws based on religious beliefs. For hundreds, if not thousands, of years most cultures have defined marriage as the union between one man and one woman. The idea that gay marriage is a violation of an American tradition is unfair, false and old fashioned. Past American traditions included slavery, denial of rights to women, and racism. American history is full of stories of pioneers who fought to shatter these “traditions” and fight for expanding human rights and our country has been consistently better off because of it. Many in opposition of same-sex marriage argue that the purpose of marriage is to procreate and that gay and lesbian couples are unable to produce children in the natural way. They fear that gay or lesbian marriages deny the primary purpose of marriage, which is the continuation of the human race and raising of children. A California Supreme Court ruling from1859 stated, “the first purpose of matrimony, by the laws of nature and society, is procreation” and there is a concern that the human population will dwindle if same-sex marriages are legalized. If one were to seriously consider this argument, marriage law would change drastically. Infertile couples would never be permitted to marry whether the infertility is due to age, health problems, or sterilization. Laws would be passed that would prohibit married couples from remaining childless voluntarily. Contraception and abortion would have to be outlawed and couples would be required by law to adopt orphaned children without stable homes or families. This reasoning is ridiculous; procreation is not the sole purpose of a marriage. The law allows elderly couples, infertile persons, and prisoners to be married although they are unable to produce a child. In our modern society marriage actually has very little to do with procreation. Gay and lesbian couples are going to adopt or have children if they want them whether or not they are married. Unmarried straight people have children and there are numerous heterosexual couples who simply choose not to have children. Those who oppose same-sex marriage argue that children of gay or lesbian parents cannot possibly receive a “normal” upbringing and are more likely to experience social and emotional problems due to their non-traditional family situation. There is a concern that these children will be bullied by their peers and grow up confused about their own sexuality as a result of not having a conventional heterosexual two-parent situation. Studies are being conducted to determine the well-being of children with homosexual parents but as you can imagine, the results vary widely depending on who is conducting the research. Opponents of same-sex families insist that girls raised without a father are at higher risk for early sexual experimentation and teenage pregnancy and those children raised without a mother are deprived of emotional security. Children of homosexual couples are reported to be at higher risk for anxiety, depression, more likely to be abused or engage in unhealthy habits such as promiscuity, drinking, or drug use. Same-sex marriage supporters will present study results that show children of gay or lesbian parents to be smarter, happier, and more successful in their adult lives. In 2007 a study conducted by the Williams Institute and the Urban Institute found that 65,000 adopted children and 14,000 foster children were living with same-sex parents. In a world where it can be difficult to find families for the hundreds of thousands foster children who are freed for adoption, it is hard to ignore the studies reporting that over a million homosexual individuals are interested in adopting. In one of the largest unbiased studies, researchers from the University of Melbourne tracked 315 same-sex parents and their more than 500 children. While there were positive and negative aspects reported, in terms of general health and family cohesion, children of same-sex parents scored higher than their peers in traditional families. The bottom line is this: Children can be successfully raised in many different parenting situations. Each family unit is different and the situations they face in daily life vary drastically. The parents, regardless of their genders, determine the well-being of the child. Is it more harmful for a child to be raised in an inconsistent foster situation or to have two homosexual parents who are willing to provide love and a stable home environment? In conclusion, the arguments against gay marriage just do not make sense. Many anti-gay marriage arguments involve religion, but society cannot impose their religious ideals on others who do not share them or believe in them. The Declaration of Independence gives Americans the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Alaskan Senator, Lisa Murkowski, released a statement on gay marriage and asks, “What could be more important to the pursuit of happiness than the right to choose your spouse without asking a Washington politician for permission?” Marriage is a right in our country and no one should be allowed to withhold that right based on discrimination. Legalizing gay marriage can only make things better, not worse as so many fear. Legalize same sex marriage because it is harmless, it is inevitable, it is more conducive to family life and it is what our history is instructing us to do.
Works Cited
Barro, Josh. "A Republican Senator Made the Best Pro-Gay Marriage Statement We 've Seen from a Major Public Official." Business Insider. Business Insider Inc, 19 June 2013. Web. 21 Mar. 2014.
Filipovic, Jill. "You Won 't Believe the Latest Absurd Argument Against Marrige Equality in Texas." Cosmopolitan. Cosmopolitan, 1 Aug. 2014. Web. 22 Mar. 2015.
"Gay Marriage ProCon.org." ProConorg Headlines. ProCon.org, n.d. Web. 21 Mar. 2015.
"Study of Same Sex Parents Finds Kids Are as Good or Better Off Than Traditional Families." The Inquisitr. The Inquisitr News, 7 July 2014. Web. 20 Mar. 2015.
Cited: Barro, Josh. "A Republican Senator Made the Best Pro-Gay Marriage Statement We 've Seen from a Major Public Official." Business Insider. Business Insider Inc, 19 June 2013. Web. 21 Mar. 2014. Filipovic, Jill. "You Won 't Believe the Latest Absurd Argument Against Marrige Equality in Texas." Cosmopolitan. Cosmopolitan, 1 Aug. 2014. Web. 22 Mar. 2015. "Gay Marriage ProCon.org." ProConorg Headlines. ProCon.org, n.d. Web. 21 Mar. 2015. "Study of Same Sex Parents Finds Kids Are as Good or Better Off Than Traditional Families." The Inquisitr. The Inquisitr News, 7 July 2014. Web. 20 Mar. 2015.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
William Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing is a play involving by deception, disloyalty, trickery, eavesdropping, and hearsay. The main examples of deception we see are from the characters of Beatrice and Benedick.. We as the audience are exposed to their ‘merry war; ad they exchange witty and sarcastic banter, providing the humor throughout Shakespeare’s comedy and very interesting comparisons to be commented onIn act 1, we are introduced to Beatrice who Beatrice tends to take charge of every conversation, not reluctant to state her own views on a subject regardless of whom she addresses. Her wit and sarcasm are wasted on the messenger, who doesn't know what to make of her. Her uncle, Leonato, acknowledges her ongoing "merry war" with Benedick. Finally, she engages Benedick himself, who can give back as good as he gets.Benedick too is mentioned before he appears, but only by Beatrice, who is clearly bitter toward him, apparently as the result of previous experience with him. In his battle of words with Beatrice, Benedick puts up a noble fight, finally putting her on the defensive, but while Benedick has the last word this time, Beatrice ends the conversation…
- 833 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Jost, K. (2003, September 5). Gay marriage. CQ Researcher, 13, 721-748. Retrieved June 22, 2010, from CQ Researcher Online, http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher…
- 4924 Words
- 20 Pages
Best Essays -
A very big topic that lingers on the hearts and minds of so many Americans today, on the desks of so many politicians and in so many courtrooms around the country today is gay marriage. There are two very identifiable sides to this debate and both sides have very defendable points of view, which are constantly being publically expressed by radicals and extremist from both sides of the spectrum. My point of views differ from those who believe that gay marriage should remain illegal however, I am going to look at both sides of this huge debate and argue the point that homosexuals should be granted the right to marry whomever they please because it is not only unconstitutional, but unjust and logically improper to forfeit to this group of people the same, equal rights to marriage as heterosexuals simply because of their sexual orientation.…
- 1566 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Smith, A. M. (2012, May 9). Same-Sex Marriages: Legal Issues. Retrieved from Congressional Research Service: www.crs.gov…
- 2390 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Kurtz, Stanley. "Beyond Gay Marriage." Weeklystandard.Com. 11 Aug. 2003. Weekly Standard. 27 Mar. 2006 .…
- 1936 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Guy, Connor. “Marriage Equality on the March.” Nation 294.10 (2012): 5. Academic Search Premier. Web. 1 Nov. 2012.…
- 1709 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Sullivan, Andrew. “Why Gay Marriage is good for Straight America.” Newsweek 25 July 2011: 1-3. SIRS Researcher. Web 14 Oct. 2011.…
- 968 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
There are over 105 million households in the United States today and out of those households, there are over 1.2 million gay people living with same-sex partners (“Census on Gays in America”). This makes the proposed legalization of same-sex marriage one of the most significant issues in contemporary America. It is presently one of the most discussed reforms in law reviews and the American court systems. If legalized, it could be one of the most revolutionary policy decisions in the history of America, along with women’s rights, interracial marriage, and slavery. There are many people who are opposed and feel it is morally and ethically wrong and others who feel that same-sex marriages are acceptable. Prior to writing about this topic, I had no strong feelings toward or against the issue on same-sex marriages. After researching and finding out more information on the topic, I became in favor of legalizing same-sex marriages.…
- 1308 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The United States’ Declaration of Independence reads, “[We] hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” and Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address furthers, “[the] [United States’] fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” But in the United States today, not all are equal. Within the majority of the United States, same-sex couples cannot be married or reap the benefits of said marriage. Marriage is basic to the recognition as equals in society and any status short of this becomes inferior, unjust and unconstitutional. Our nation cannot live up to its promise of equality and the fundamental rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, until the invidious discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is done away with. Equality under the law extends to all persons. Legalizing same-sex marriage, a recognition of basic American principles, would represent the culmination of our nation’s commitment to equal rights. Americans and those who believe and live by the words of the Declaration of Independence, Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, the 14th Amendment, and in the Constitution’s guarantees of equal protection and equal dignity before the law cannot stand idle while this wrong continues. Any prohibitions on same-sex marriage, whatsoever, are entirely discriminatory. Gay rights are civil rights and all Americans should have the right to marry the person of their choice, regardless of their sexual orientation. Thus, same-sex marriage should be legalized in the United States.…
- 1865 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
BRAD BANNON, . "Why the Supreme Court Will Rule in Favor of Gay Marriage." USNews. (2013): n. page. Web. 15 Apr. 2013. <http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/brad-bannon/2012/12/12/why-the-supreme-court-will-rule-in-favor-of-gay-marriage>.…
- 1524 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Bonnell, Gregory. "Get The Facts | Marriage Equality USA." Marriage Equality USA | Marriage Equality USA. Web. 07 Dec. 2010. <http://www.marriageequality.org/get-the-facts>.…
- 2890 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Bibliography: "Gay marriages should be allowed, state judge rules," The Wall Street Journal, Dec. 4, 1996.…
- 1190 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
If marriage is such a soulful, binding occurrence, why would American society choose to deny a segment of the population the right to experience it? That question is central to the debate of gay marriage. Some opponents use the argument that granting gays the right to marry is a "special right," or that the financial cost of gay marriage benefits to the United States government and to businesses is prohibitive. Others espouse the position that gay marriage is just inherently wrong. Still others argue that same-sex couples ' bid for legal marriage actually threatens the institution of marriage itself, and is contradictory to America 's Judeo-Christian roots. All of these arguments are based upon dubious evidence and…
- 4293 Words
- 18 Pages
Best Essays -
| Your paper conforms to proper APA style formatting in both in-text citations and reference page.…
- 2649 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In conclusion, gun violence is a horrific global issue as there are many situations where people will use the reality of tiny problems to the harm of guns. One of the biggest factors of shooting is mental illness and seeing the weapon will trigger thoughts about harm and this lack of positivity will cause more aggression and anger. Secondly, if violence often occurs in neighbourhood, it is likely to notice that some witnesses are youth. Due to this tragedy they had experience; they will either suffer from a mental illness, insecurity and anxiety or even own a gun as a key of protection. Thirdly, higher rates of gun ownership will more likely cause more deaths and more violent crimes, for example, robberies, aggravated assaults, homicides and…
- 174 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays