Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Marriage Rate Trend Analysis

Powerful Essays
2810 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marriage Rate Trend Analysis
The cultural tradition of marriage has long been considered one of the most enduring and meaningful moments in the history of an American’s life. From an anthropological standpoint, marriage in America is a rite of passage that two people partake in once they are economically, socially, and psychologically stable enough to make a long term commitment. This commitment historically has marked the transition from adolescence, to adulthood. One of marriages primary goals is to integrate sex, parenthood, economic cooperation, and emotional intimacy in a permanent union. Marriage has long been held in high esteem because it represents love, which is the very essence of the human condition. The institution of marriage is recognized by the state as a legal union in which the couples can economically profit, and the church recognizes marriage as a union which will bring the couple closer to God. Although marriage has long been one of the most important structures set forth by our society, the amount of people getting married is declining at an unprecedented rate. In 1970, there were approximately 76.5 marriages for every 1000 unmarried women under the age of 15. By the year 2000, the marriage rate dramatically decreased to only 44.5, and 8 years later, the marriage rate hit an all- time low at 34.8 marriages for every 1000 unmarried women. (Lee). The future of marriage looks to either become completely obsolete, or of utmost meaning, due to the decline of the marriage rate over the course of the last 30 years, due to the trends of the increased prevalence of cohabitation, individualism, and the fear of marriage, which could lead to negative impacts on children of single family homes, and on society as a whole. The institution of marriage has forgone a constant evolution throughout history, and different parts of the world. Although we now associate marriage with love, many historians believe that marrying for love is a recent Western innovation ( Coontz). In the stone age, individuals began to group themselves together in order to establish structure for child rearing, and in order to maximize the output of tasks that needed to be done on a daily bases. The first marriage ceremonies are believed to be held over 4000 years ago in Ancient Mesopotamia. (The Week). During the early history of marriage, from the period of antiquity, to the renaissance, politics and money were the predominant reasons for marriage. (Psychology Today). The main role of marriage amongst the elite was to preserve power with kings and other members of the elite by offering up their daughters for marriage in order to create alliances. However, the main role of marriage amongst the average citizens, and the poor was procreation, and the continuation of the family blood line. (The Week). During this time, love in marriage was seen as destructive, and undesirable. The Greek’s and French both viewed lovesickness as insanity (Coontz). During the early stages of the history of marriage, it was acceptable, and even expected for a man to take a concubine, if his wife did not bare him any children. In the Bible, Solomon is cited as taking upwards of 300 concubines. In ancient Rome, marriage was a civil structure which was governed by the state. When Rome collapsed in the 5th century, the Catholic Church took over and changed the definition of marriage at the time. Instead of marriage being a social structure, it was now viewed as a union between a man and a woman, which will bring them closer to God. As the church expanded and tightened its grasp upon the reigns of societies collective self-conscious in the middle Ages, it also expanded and tightened its grasp upon the fundamentals of marriage. In 1215, the church greatly heightened the importance of marriage, by declaring it one of the church's seven sacraments, alongside rites like baptism and penance. During the early stages of marriage, the customs and traditions were far different from what they are today. Marriages were used as a political pawn, and in order to bring couples together, to continue the blood line of families, until the Catholic Church illuminated the meaning of marriage. (The Week.) From the 1600’s, to the Victorian Era, marriage evolved more than it had in the previous millennia. In the 1600’s marriage become more of a family affair. A marriage between two families meant shared wealth. At this time however, people would still go to family for love and emotional support. In the late 1600’s, married love was considered inappropriate (Psychology Today). However, during this time, the world was experiencing a new wave of revolutionary thought, which is historically referred to the Enlightenment. During this period, philosophers began to express their belief that the most important part of life is happiness. Because of their philosophies, a good amount of people began to marry for love rather than wealth or status. This was perpetuated by the Industrial Revolution and the growth of the middle class in the 19th century, which allowed men to select a spouse and pay for a wedding, regardless of parental approval. As people took more control of their love lives, they began to demand the right to end unhappy unions. (The Week). Over the course of the last 100 years, the United States has witnessed an unparalleled social revolution. This revolution paid witness to a completely new idea of marriage. During the last century, society left behind its old ways of marrying for family and economic reasons, and has instead embraced love as the main reason for marriage. In the 1920’s the United States underwent a sexual revolution in which dating became widely popular, and sex was embraced by popular culture. During the 1950’s marriage became almost compulsory, with 4/5 people claiming that those who are single are “immoral”. During the 1970’s women finally began to gain equal rights within the marriage, which changed the structure of marriage. Today, Marriage is considered the ultimate expression of love. Because marriage is associated with admitting ones love with their partner, more gays and lesbians are seeking the right to marry, than ever before. People today are more cautious and slow to marry, because they are looking “the one”, which has lead to more couples cohabitating than ever before. Although marriage rates are declining, and divorce rates are higher than ever before, the idea of a perfect wedding is still universal and desired (Psychology Today). One of the major factors that have led to the staggering decline in the amount of people get married is the increased prevalence of cohabitation amongst couples. Cohabitation was once conceived to be immoral, unjust, and “sinful”. Throughout the last few generations, the taboo and the possibility of being socially ostracized have effectively been removed from the fabric of our society (Jayson). Although the amount of people who are married has fallen from 72 percent in 1960, to 52 percent in 2011, the amount of people cohabiting has increased an unprecedented 350 percent (Halett). According to Larry L. Bumpass, a professor of demography and ecology at the University of Wisconsin, and the author of the article, “The Declining Significance of Marriage: Changing Family Life in the United States, “ as the normative link between sex and marriage eroded, there was progressively less reason for unmarried couples to not share households. What this means is that the values of our society has changed. Premarital sex was once considered to be greatly inappropriate, and has now become widely accepted in nearly all phases of our culture. According to a 2002 survey of 40,000 people between the ages of 15 and 44, a staggering 95% reported having had pre-marital sex .As time progressed, and sex became acceptable before marriage, many people lost the need to wed. They could now live together, because it was socially acceptable. Millions of Americans now decide to just cohabit, because marriage is no longer needed to be accepted in most circles of society. Over the last few decades, the United States has welcomed in a new age of “expressive individualism” (Cherlin, 47). Americans have, since the founding of our country, upheld liberty, individual choice, and personal freedom as the highest ideals. These values had been balanced out by the equally strong desire for the communal, collective well-being of society and of the country. Over the last 30 years, the United States has seen in an influx of education, and has seen women gain more rights during the age of women’s liberation. According to Andrew J. Cherlin, author of the article, “American Marriage in Transition”, “each person has a unique core of feeling and intuition that should unfold or be expressed if individuality is to be realized”. Today’s society is centered on self-improvement, and self-fulfillment. According to Allen Holt, a minister at the Harvest Church of Christ, the marriage rate is declining today because people are more self-centered, career oriented, and more focused on independently establishing themselves in the world. Marriage in the 1950’s was needed to be accepted socially, but it has since strayed from that. The reason that is acceptable to not be married today is because the very definition or reason behind marriage has largely changed. Marriage is now less of an institution that one partakes in as a requirement, but is now more a way for an individual to achieve happiness. During the 1970, the Women’s Right’s Movement greatly advanced a women’s role in society. It was during this time that women began to become more educated, and work higher paying jobs. During the 50’s, the majority of women were dependent on a husband to provide for them, so they saw marriage as a form of economic security. Over the last 30 years, women have advanced, and are no longer dependent on a husband to be economically secure. This change in society changed the very fabric of marriage in our culture. Instead of marrying for economic security, woman is now more likely to marry for love, and for self-fulfillment purposes. The Women’s Rights Movement helped them become more individualistic, which therefore skewed gender roles. Because people are now more educated, and women are considered equal upon men, the average age of marriage has risen to 27 years old (Lee). Due to more people expressing the need for individual fulfillment and success, people are more likely to wait to get married until they are economically stable, or not at all, which has helped substantially decrease the marriage rate.
Over the last few generations, not only has the marriage rate declined, but the divorce rate has also skyrocketed. The rise in the divorce rate could prove unattractive to many young couples in serious relationships. In the early 1970’s, Governor of California, Ronald Reagan signed the "no fault" divorce bill into law. As a result, between 1960 and 1980, the divorce rate in America more than doubled. Over the last 30 years, the divorce rate has continued to increase, therefore, luring some couples away from marriage. Dr. Sharon Sassler, a sociologist at Cornell University recently conducted a survey in order to obtain a better understanding of cohabitation. Sassler interviewed 122 people about their living circumstances and relationship. Although Sassler’s questions were focused solely on cohabitation, 2 out of 3 of the people surveyed brought up their fears of divorce. This study accentuates the fear that many Americans now have of divorce, since it is now so commonplace. Individuals in the United States are afraid to commit, and to end up divorcing, so they avoid it all together by just living with each other, or nota allowing themselves to commit to a long term relationship at all ( Bindley). As the marriage rate continues to decline, it leaves more and more children without a traditional family unit. Today more children are born into a single family home than ever before, with 40 percent of children being born to a single mother (The Future of Marriage). Living in a single parent home, can affect a child’s emotional and social development. When parents are left with all of the burden of raising a child, they are not able to give a child the quality of parenting that could have been provided by a couple. Single parents tend to have lower expectations, and are not as demanding of their children. It is amongst popular belief that there is a direct correlation between poor academic achievement, emotional problems, low self-esteem, and a plethora of other issues with children and the inadequate quality of parenting provided by a single parent ( Bumpass).According to the Index of Leading Cultural Indicators, children that are brought up in an untraditional family setting, with only one parent, account for 63 percent of all youth suicides, 70 percent of all teenage pregnancies, 71 percent of all adolescent chemical abuse, 80 percent of all prison inmates, and 90 percent of all homeless and runaway children. Studies show that children brought up by single mothers are “ five times more likely to commit suicide, nine times more likely to drop out of high school, 10 times more likely to abuse drugs, 14 times more likely to commit rape, 20 times more likely to end up in prison, and 32 times more likely to end up in prison ( Future of Children). If the marriage rate continues to decline, it would leave more and more children without two parents, which could negatively affect the development of children. However, the development of children is not all that is affected. Because of the staggering consequences of living in a single parent home, it could have a severe negative impact on the economy, and the society of America. As the prevalence of single parent households continue to grow due to the decline of marriage, so does the possibility of all of the aforementioned statistics. As the marriage rate continues to decline, it could prove detrimental to society as a whole.
If the trend of the declining marriage does not slow down soon, marriage could be rendered completely obsolete. Studies now show that 40 percent of Americans believe that marriage is not important in today’s society. ( Cnn). Over the last 30 years, the amount of people that are married has rapidly declined, and has no signs of slowing down anytime in the near future. Marriage is no longer necessary in our society, and is being replaced by other structures such as cohabitation. At this rate, cohabitation will soon become the new norm, and marriage will become a thing of the past.
Although there is a great possibility that marriage could become obsolete, it could also further evolve its meaning. According to Allen Holt , a minister at Harvest Church of Christ, as long as there are Christians and followers of the Bible , there will always be a large number of people who marry because they believe that it brings them closer to god. Holt also points out that although it is contrary to his beliefs, the amount of gays and lesbians that are now marrying will ensure that marriage would remain relevant. In today’s society, people wait longer to marry, until they are financially stable, and are sure that they found they found their “soul mate”. According to Holt, this could strengthen the meaning of marriage. People with less education are more likely to cohabitate, and less likely to marry. Holt theorizes that marriage will not go away, but the meaning of marriage will only intensify so that it represents the, “pinnacle of love, economic stability, and a relationship with God”. The declining marriage rate could be spun as a positive for marriage. Although the amount of people getting married has decreased, and will continue to decrease, marriage will mean much more to future generations than it does today.
Marriage has long been one of the most important structures of American society. Over the last 30 years, the amount of people getting married has significantly declined. This decline is due to the increased amount of cohabitation, and individualism, coupled with the growing trend of divorce. Cohabitation is more acceptable in society today, so couples are more likely to live together, and not get married. In our society today people are more educated and personal goal oriented, so they strive for personal success, before marriage, if they decided that they want to marry at all. The increasing trend of divorce has also helped lower the marriage rate because many Americans are now scared to marry because they fear that divorce is certain. As the trend of the declination of the marriage rate continues, so does the expansion of the amount of single parent homes. Children who are raised by single parents are much more at risk for a plethora of unacceptable and undesirable actions. If the trend of people not getting married continues, it could prove detrimental to more and more children, and the rest of society. The future of marriage in America has two possibilities. Marriage will either become completely obsolete a thing of the past because cohabitation will become the most efficient system or the amount of marriages will continue to decline, but, the meaning behind those marriages will continue to rise.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    According to Elizabeth Freeman “Marriage” has two simultaneous but incompatible functions. She explains the two factors are to determine property and economic interests and the ultimate symbol of intimacy in the emotional lives of people. Nonetheless, she perceived the contradictory affects between the institutions of marriage regulated by both church and state and whether the marriage is a matter of love or law. The United States saw marriages as a template for the ideal society as a form of ownership.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Your life can set up a disaster or can make it worth so much. In David Popenoe and Barbara Dafoe Whitehead’s article “The State of Our Union,” the topic of marriage and divorce are discussed. This paper shows and discusses the chances of divorce, the statistics on cohabitation, and economic benefits of being married. This paper is a summary of the article. This topic is important because it affects our everyday lives (Popenoe and Whitehead 390-402).…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coontz Summary

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Stephanie Coontz’s, “A Pop Quiz on Marriage; The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love”, Coontz shows us historically how marriage has changed tremendously and why it has changed. She gives an example how people once married for political reasons and necessity. Then she explains that now, people marry for love, togetherness, and sex. Before the modern era, marrying for love was frowned upon. People married each other because they were forced to by their parents. In some cases, if a man and a woman were in love, it was looked upon as a limitation to the importance as more valued objects, such as god or family.Some people even had multiple wives or husbands and there was no jealousy between them. Today, there would be a whole lot of problems if…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the essay “The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love”, Stephanie Coontz discusses the change marriage has made among the different cultures around the world and how it went from being an act that was necessary to something that was done for personal joy and fulfillment.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chick Fil-A

    • 852 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “I think we are inviting God’s judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say ‘we know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage’ and I pray God’s mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we have the audacity to define what marriage is about. We are a family-owned business, a family-led business, and we are married to our first wives. We give God thanks for that. We want to do anything we possibly can to strengthen families. We are very much committed to that” (Valentin).…

    • 852 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the essay “The Radical Idea of marrying for Love,” Stephanie Coontz voices her opinion on George Shaw theory, the expectations of love and how it has changed over time. Shaw believes that marriage is “an institution that brings together two people under the influence of the most violent, most insane, most delusive and most transient of passions (Coontz 378). Marriage overtime had different variations depending the time frame in which it was in, and the culture that influenced it.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Popenoe

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    David Popenoe and Barbara Dafoe Whitehead’s evolved thesis statement is, “ Americans are living longer, marrying later, exiting marriages more quickly, and choosing to live together before marriage, after marriage, in between marriages, and as an alternative to marriage,” (27). More and more people are getting divorced each year. There are a lot of people who never get married and live either single or unmarried. The “State of the Union” shows how divorce and living style of marriage has…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marriage has gone through profound changes over the last five decades, but we continue to speak about it as though it's the same old familiar pattern. To see how much has changed; I am going to look at the shift from the forties, to the sixties, to today. In 1968, less than a year after the famous Summer of Love, as they used to say out in the country, "The times they were a-changing." The sexual revolution, Viet Nam, drugs--the youth of the day were convinced the world would never be the same again. Yet they didn't think about how such changes would affect marriage. It seemed as if they thought it would be about the same as it had been for their parents, except better because they (like most youth of most times) thought they were better than…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the last 40 years marriage rates have declined significantly while the number of couple’s cohabitating has risen rapidly. This is due to our changing society where equality, laws, social acceptance and religions have all contributed into the way we view marriage and relationships. In the 1970’s there were around 400,000 first marriages whereas, in 2011, there were 248,000. The average ages of people getting married have also increased from 25 for men and 23 for women in 1961 to 36 for men and 33 for women in 2011. Cohabitation is a big factor in the decreasing number of marriages with people using it as either an alternative to marriage entirely, or a ‘trial marriage’ which just delays the time of a couple’s marriage.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stephanie Coontz’s essay on “The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love” shows her opinion that the expectations of marriage are unrealistic based on different societies around the world in different time periods. For example in George Bernard Shaw’s theory, he believed that married was “an institution that brings together two people under the influence of the most violent, most insane, most delusive and most transient of passions” (qtd. I’m Coontz 378). In our history all of the world marriage has been said to be a tool of survival. Emotional love played a small part in marriage and was even sometimes discouraged. Even in today’s world love is still no seen as a necessity of marriage.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Suffocation Model

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the article The Suffocation Model: Why Marriage in America Is Becoming an All-or-Nothing Institution written by Eli J. Finkel, Elaine O. Cheung, Lydia F. Emery, Kathleen L. Carswell, and Grace M. Larson, the shift of marriage in American history was exemplified. These authors elaborated on how marriage has currently been deemed the suffocation model and the positive and negative connotations this type of marriage consists of was brought to light. A brief view of the different eras of marriage from 1776 to present are shown as well as how each era fits in with Maslow’ hierarchy of needs.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The propensity of individuals to frame organizations and set up family units is ordinary of the entire humanity. It is imperative to take note of that in setting up these marriage organizations, some type of custom is completed (Hutchinson). In addition, there are both momentous similitudes and contrasts of thought, thoughts, and imagery crosswise over societies in these customs (Monger). America is a various nation and its marriage conventions have been impacted by distinctive societies. This paper investigates marriage traditions in America and different nations.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1950's Marriage Decline

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The average number of marriages has declined since the 1950’s for various reasons that scholars have tried to explain through their research (Vanorman & Scommegna, 2016). Even with the legalization of same sex marriage, there has been a decline in the number of married adults in the United States. In 1960, about three-quarters of all American adults were married, compared to 2014 where the number had decreased to about half of all American adults being married (Vanorman & Scommegna, 2016). The United States’s marriage trend has been influenced by factors such as cohabitation, delayed marriage, an increase in divorce with a decrease in remarriage, and the increase of having children out of wedlock (Vanorman & Scommegna, 2016).…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article” The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love “the author gives a global interpretation of what marrying for love means to different cultures. While Americans strive to focus on the love connection before marriage, the writer of the article Stephanie Coontz points out that other countries practice the total opposite. Although marriage is an institution that brings two people together, Coontz describes this as being “under the influence of the most violent, most insane, most delusive and most transient of passions” and are required to feel excited about each other every day for the rest of their lives until death do them apart.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Americans do just about everything a bit more spectacularly than most other people. That includes marriage and divorce. The United States has the world's highest divorce rate and it also leads in the rate of remarriage after divorce, an occurrence that frequently boosts the statistics by leading to yet another breakup. Americans, in short, appear to be marrying more and enjoying it less. This situation distresses clergymen, sociologists and anthropologists, who rightly regard stable marriage as the foundation of society. But it is only half the tragedy of divorce in America. The real scandal is not that so many Americans resort to divorce. It is that so many of the laws of the land are sadly out of step with the growing…

    • 2659 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics