Martin Luther King Jr. Vs Malcolm X Essay

Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X both had philosophy's on racial discrimination. Martin Luther King’s philosophy on violence, public education, and integration made the most sense to Americans in 1600’s, than Malcolm X’s philosophy. Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence ,because violence doesn't solve any problems and only makes problems worse. Malcolm X did not favor violence ,but believes that they can't get realization and dignity of Negroes by civil terms. Martin Luther King Jr.’s philosophy is more agreeable than Malcolm X’s philosophy, because King was right, violence doesn’t solve any problems and leads nowhere. King stated ,”It multiplies evil and violence in the universe.”(King,1963). Which, shows that if they weren't fighting peacefully there was only going to be more evil and violence. King says that, ”Basic to philosophy of nonviolence is the refusal to cooperate with evil.”(King,1963). Which, for ,six months the black people denied to buy items from
and Malcolm X both had philosophy on civil rights for African Americans. King’s philosophy on public education made more sense to Americans in 1600’s than Malcolm X’s philosophy on public education. King’s philosophy on public education was that all races should be integrated. In King’s “Our God is Marching On” speech, he stated,” Let us march on segregated schools until every vestige of segregation and inferior education becomes a thing of the past and Negroes and whites study side by side in the socially healing context of the classroom.”(King,1965). Malcolm X’s philosophy on public education is encouraging Afro-Americans to install colleges and educational workshops,liberation schools and child-care in their own people. King’s philosophy is superior,because Malcolm X wants whites and blacks to stay separated in public education which defeats the purpose of integration as a whole. Martin Luther King’s philosophy defiantly made more sense ,than Malcolm X’s