In Martin Luther King Jr. “Letter from Birmingham Jail” he responds to the “eight white religious leaders of the South” (King, par.1). That wrote a statement in a newspaper calling the peaceful and nonviolent civil rights demonstrations extremities. He voiced his disappointment in the statements made by the “white religious man” (King, par.1) that praised brutal and violent police men and called for an end to the peaceful demonstrations from the African American community. Throughout the extended letter King expressed the need for direct actions and willingness to fight peacefully against laws. King also talked about why the civil rights movement could wait longer and encouraged the “white religious man” (King, par.1) and the general public to take a moment and view through African American eyes why they fight for equality. Also throughout the letter King makes it a point to talk about the right timing, just and unjust laws, and the need to make a stand.…
King said that before anyone takes direct action, the protester first needs to “purify” (567) their soul so that he or she will have no regrets going forward. Taking direct action is the right path but, it needs to be understood that there will be consequences for those actions. Taking a stand has never been easy and can be extremely difficult, but for the future progress of the African American, it was necessary. The protester needed to possess a firm moral conviction that their cause was a righteous and just cause. By combining nonviolent resistance, direct action, and a firm conviction of their cause, King was confident that the oppressors would come to join him in the quest for equality. All other issues would fade away and the only thing left to see would be the true issue, a "good versus evil"…
Based on “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” King states “A law is unjust if it is inflicted on a minority that, as a result of being denied the right to vote, had no part in enacting or devising the law.” This shows that King is saying that anyone has the right to break the laws if those laws are unjust without using violence. King also reveals “My friends, I must say to you that we have not made a single gain in civil rights without determined legal and nonviolent pressure.” This demonstrates that King believes that violence isn’t the key to fix problems. King proclaimed that African American must make changes to achieve true…
These defiant actions created tension, but still maintained King’s core principles of being peaceful. But for those who were angry and didn’t understand why African Americans were deliberately committing illegal acts, King not only explains his plan, but continues to dig deeper by answering a question that was asked by many during that time: “Why direct action, why sit-ins, marches and so forth?” (King 2). This shows that people that King wants to help bring clarification that his actions were logistical and justifiable, and that he was not making rash decisions without just…
Dr. King’s Letter from Birmingham Jail was written in response to the violent racist terrorist attacks toward the African Americans in Birmingham, Alabama, as well as to respond to the criticism he received about his work in a respectful, yet powerful way. He was arrested and sent to jail while participating in a non-violent anti-segregation march because he had no permit. Treatment of African Americans were unfair and un-American and Dr. King had enough of the way African American’s were treated and in his letter wrote: “Injustice anywhere is a threat to injustice everywhere.” In order to spread freedom throughout Birmingham, Dr. King followed through with a plan built on facts, negotiation, and non-violent direct action mainly in the form…
Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” uses emotional and logical appeals in response to criticism from white clergymen of his actions, and though in jail King explains in an open, personal, diplomatic, heartfelt and completely inoffensive manner why he believes in the validity for civil disobedience and for nonviolent action.…
The clergymen called King an extremist for standing up for what was right and wanting to march. King hoped that the march would turn negative energy into a positive one, to support his thoughts king would often use example from other leaders who decided to step up and make a change. King often relied on the example set by Socrates, Paul and Jesus so that the clergymen could see that oppression is still going on. King goes on to state that “Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressors; it must be deemed by the oppressed”, and that’s exactly what was happening. They were demanding what was morally right. King brought to the light that being poor does not only relate to those who have less, financially but emotionally also. This is seen in the injustice practiced during this time. Even though the odds were against all who were fighting for change Dr. King remained very positive and hopeful he believed that even if they did not get all they wanted they would leave a mark, hoping that eventually things would get…
From a critical viewpoint, King makes a very persuasive argument using logic and emotions to influence the audience that he is in fact right in taking a non-violent action but more so justified from the basic humanity laws. He denies idea that he is supporting some laws while breaking other by making a distinction between just and unjust laws. He talks about the difference between moral and political and just and unjust laws. For example, Parade law that put him in jail is just in letter but unjust when applied to violate constitution. King also justifies breaking laws by citing historical examples of civil disobedience, such as: the Old Testament, Early Christians in Rome, Socrates, Boston Tea Party, Freedom Fighters against Hitler. He then uses emotions to convince his readers that it is the white moderate that are really at fault, conveying the message that he is a victim of circumstance and society. He uses this to lead into the criticism of his extremism. King is really a moderate between two extremes of black action between doing nothing and becoming violent. He cautions that without his movement, the extreme of hating whites will win out and cause more violence. He then shows that he is indeed a pacifistic by recognition and praise of those whites who have helped his cause. King tries to refute the clergyman’s disapproval of the actions that occurred in Birmingham, he tries to redirects praise to the civil rights protestors, and reconstructs a harmonious…
King was trying to explain non violence to the angry, oppressed black men and women who wanted to do nothing more than to take their rifles and dispose of their problems. However, how could he get people to follow the nonviolent movement when the Vietnam war was anything but. Martin Luther King asserts in the passage, “Their questions hit me, and I knew that i could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to greatest purveyor of violence in the world today - - my own…
He understood the necessity for peace to achieve progress. When one is willing to compromise with an adversary it allows for a greater chance for progress. Given the inequalities of the time, King had every right to demand an equal playing field the second he was discriminated against. However, he also realized people’s inability to want to change. Thus, he recognized the demands of the other. The implications of this led to another one of the steps that he provided. He outlines the importance of “self-purification.” I take this to mean understanding the biases that blind one’s perception and living by the words that you preach. King was a man to say what he meant, but also to mean what he said. This allowed is movement to have greater credibility and allowed for a larger number or individuals to be willing to follow his movement and advocate in a non-violent way.…
He wanted peace for everyone and getting through with that using tension, but non-violence. He needed a tension that would force society to see the social injustice. MLK stated, “...there is a type of constructive, nonviolent tension which is necessary for growth.” (King). It is common knowledge that MLK wrote letters from Birmingham while in solitary confinement. This shows just how strongly he felt about this topic and the people he was trying to support. He took his readers seriously and took thought to their point of view. King tried to directly connect with the readers and supporters of this letter by giving an example of injustice in his life. He explained how the Negro community is still waiting for their constitutional rights and the segregation that was still occurring after 340 years, and how he had to explain to his kids why colored people get treated so differently than white…
Peace, “ a state of mutual harmony between people or groups, especially in personal relations”.(Dictionary.com) Is it possible on earth? Unfortunately, no. We have wars, arguments, and bullies all around us. It’s just not possible for our world, and peace is getting out of our grasp. Everyday peace is slowly slipping away. But one man thought he could make peace between people, change their perspective about each other.…
King did many things to bring people together through peace. When Rosa Parks was arrested, he did a peaceful boycott to protest the colour laws on the bus. That boycott lasted for 382 days, and almost the entire African americans refused to ride the buses. Even when they were doing a peaceful protest and they children and adults were being blasted with water and then them being arrested, they did not result to violence. The start of the Civil right movement was at the March on Washington on where 250,000 people marched to the Lincoln Memorial where Martin Luther King gave his famous “I have a Dream” speech. In the crowd at the March on Washington, they had undercover marshalls in the crowd to keep the peace, but “the marchers chose peace that sunny Wednessday” (www.history.com Civil Rights Movement). If they hadn’t chosen peace like Malcolm X did, and then the problem would have just gotten worse. The marches and protests were important stepping stones to pass the civil rights. So Martin Luther King brought many people together through his many boycotts, marches, and peaceful protests. They peacefully protested against the political and social injustice. He started his nonviolent protests by the teachings of Ghandi. Martin Luther said after a visit about nonviolence “I am more convinced than ever before that the method of nonviolent resistance is the most potent weapon available to oppressed people in their struggle for justice and human dignity.” (Crash Course…
Martin Luther King JR. went to Birmingham to "engage in a nonviolent direct action program if such were deemed necessary"(2). Birmingham is one of the most segregated cities so Martin Luther King went there to try and help bring equality towards them. Although King's actions were peaceful and nonviolent, he still was sent to jail. Martin Luther King didn't even resist when he was arrested. King's resistance to the laws were not in any way negative, the cops and some people were the ones that made it negative. King explained that there are four basic steps to a nonviolent campaign, collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self purification; and direct action. Throughout every step and every peaceful resistance they had, it made no difference. They figured it was time try direct action. Even though their direct action was peaceful, he was still sent to jail. When King said, "Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue.", I thought he made a really good point. You could do any form of resistance and they wont hear you out.…
Martin Luther King, Jr. emerged as a pivotal leader in the Civil Rights Movement. Dr. King was an advocate for civil disobedience and peaceful protest. In 1963, following his arrest during a protest in Birmingham, Alabama, Dr. King wrote “Letter from Birmingham Jail” where various sources of oppression were described along with how to combat such oppression. In the letter, Martin Luther King, Jr. explained promises made to the African Community for equality that were never met. As a result of the broken promises, Dr. King called for pressure to be put on the authority figures who instigated such oppression. Dr. King described the pressure as a “direct action” and that the pressure would force negotiation to occur. Negative emotions were in the African American Community. Martin Luther King, Jr. wrote that these emotions could manifest themselves a violence, if not expressed. However, Dr. King warned against acts of violence to achieve the desired end of equality. In the letter, Martin Luther King, Jr. revealed to white leaders the racism faced by African Americans and the difficulties faced by the children of this…