King’s leadership resulted in one of the the greatest non-violent mass protests in the history of the western world. King represented a sense of hope and promise to the followers of the Civil Rights Movement. The most important aspect to understand in this debate is King’s non-violence. With many other African-American leaders, such as Malcolm X, taking a more aggressive, violent approach to change, King saw the potential in Ghandi’s peaceful protests. As Fairclough writes, “Few blacks believed that the city’s businessmen would have accepted desegregation but for the double pressure of the demonstrations and the economic boycott of downtown stores” (209). The only effective events in the Civil Rights movements were those that followed King’s system of non-violence. While Carson argues that rather than King’s presence, “the success of the black movement required the mobilization of black communities…”(219), this assertion is made under the assumption that a non-violent leader would organize the masses. Without King’s leadership, there may have been an violent uprising that only led to more tensions between the…
Given the hardships and struggles the demonstrators in the Birmingham Campaign went through within the span of a month to get Birmingham desegregated, it is easy to see why the Birmingham Campaign is considered one of the most influential campaigns of the 1960s Civil Rights Movement, however, this is not the only reason for such. A little over a year after the end of the campaign, in July 2nd of 1964, the Civil Rights Act of 1964- the prohibition of discrimination based on age, gender, race, religion, or national origin- was signed into law by the 35th President of the United States, Lyondon B. Johnson; among the various other incidents credited for playing a part in the passage of this act lies the Birmingham Campaign- the incident that acted as a sort of catalyst for President John F. Kennedy to deliver his Civil Rights Address on June 11th, 1963, in which he called for a piece of legislation that gave all Americans the right to be served in public establishments and a better protected right to vote. Then, shortly after the end of the Birmingham Campaign on May 10th of 1963 and the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom on August 28th of that same year, Dr. Rev.…
The point of this march was to fight against employment discrimination, discrimination, and violence against African Americans as well as other minorities and it was also marched to support the famed Civil Rights Act that JFK was attempting to pass in Congress. King’s March on Washington was largely successful, with Kennedy’s vice president who took office after his assassination, Lyndon B. Johnson, signing the Civil Rights Act of 1964. MLK’s peaceful protest tactics spearheaded this movement and inspired many others by utilizing the peaceful aspect to identify African Americans as equal human beings. Priorly African Americans were believed by White Supremacists to be less advanced, less developed, and savage beings. His use of social disobedience was massively important in giving African American activists the confidence to stand up against unjust legislation and discrimination against them.…
Martin Luther King Jr. silent movements were a main part through the whole movement to equality in America (What Did Martin Luther King Do…1). On the History Channel, there was a documentary about Martin Luther King Jr. in his peaceful movements. He gathered inspiration from his mentor, Mahatma Gandhi about his own peaceful protest in India and brought these strategies to the United States. His silent protest changed the thought of the way a protest should be and the thoughts of people. His silent protest changed the viewpoints of many people. His protest was so powerful it even changed laws like the “Voting Rights Act”. His silent protest brought America together and also gave us one of his most famous speeches “I Have…
According to the article, Martin Luther King Jr.’s Last March, by National Archives, and the excerpts from his famous speech, “I have been to the mountain top”, it shows that he pushed for non violent changes because he spoke with leaders of the opposing sides, gave a famous speech, and stated that it is either nonviolence or nonexistence. The thought of violence disturbed Martin Luther King Jr., and made him very tired and weary. He made many attempts throughout his life to stop the violence because he believed if the violence continued, there would be nothing left.…
When MLK talks about the “end” I believe he is talking about a conclusion to any situation. Whether it is death or the resolution of a conflict, the end can either be good or bad. In one of King’s action programs should always be nonviolent, in turn leading to a just and pure endings. When we take war for example, the end is undeniably going to end with the loss of soldiers and innocent people fighting for their countries, but had the countries taken the nonviolent approach, then many lives are saved. Take the current War on Iraq for example, 4500 lives would be saved, and over 32,000 wounded wouldn’t be. I know that sounds farfetched and unfair to make that statement but it is the ugly truth. War is a prime…
Disobedience causes the right things to happen, it is like the key to good things, well sometimes. In past historical events, there was many issues involving disobedience; rebellions were a major impact of the happenings too. For example, Rosa Parks, she refused to give up her seat on the bus, so people started boycotting buses and due to that, blacks were able to get rights. Even though Rosa Parks had to serve jail time, she was the main cause of those rights today. Rosa Parks was not the only person who did something like this and served jail time as well, Martin Luther King Jr. He fought for equality, rebelled in order to accomplish what he started and believed in. For the blacks and the whites to be one nation, to be mixed all together…
This paper will discuss what Martin Luther King Jr., Fredrick Douglass, Henry David Thoreau, and Benazir Bhutto have to say about civil disobedience; though coming from different backgrounds they still have the same views or beliefs. This will be done by looking at Martin Luther King Jr.’s work The Letter from Birmingham Jail, Fredrick Douglass’s from Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, and Henry David Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience and comparing what these authors have in common. Most of these authors, if not all, have these themes in common: understanding human rights, the relationship between just and unjust laws, and the difference between human law and a “higher law”. Martin Luther King Jr. was a civil rights…
For Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday, I've been reflecting on the principles of nonviolence that he learned during the historic yearlong bus boycott in Montgomery, Alabama. After Rosa Parks refused to sit in the back of the bus, broke the segregation law, and was arrested on Dec. 1, 1955, the African-American leadership in Montgomery famously chose young Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. to lead their campaign. He was an unknown quantity. Certainly, no one expected him to emerge as a Moses-like tower of strength. No one imagined he would invoke Gandhi's method of nonviolent resistance in Christian language as the basis for the boycott. But from day one, he was a force to be reckoned with. With the help of Bayard Rustin and Glenn Smiley of…
One of the most famous activist leaders for the Civil Right Movement was Martin Luther King Jr, who preached a nonviolent social change. During the Civil Rights Movement Martin Luther King Jr wrote, gave speeches, and organized nonviolent protest in order to demonstrate racial discrimination, and to request for legislation to protect the rights of African Americans. Though, King promoted a nonviolent resistance, whites didn’t see any difference, which still provoked them to mistreat African Americans. One great example of these actions were during the 1963 Birmingham, Alabama March/Movement.…
The most notable and intriguing example of police brutality in the past happened during the Birmingham campaign. The Birmingham campaign was a nonviolent civil rights movement that was led by Martin Luther King Jr. During the campaign, the Birmingham Police Department, led by Eugene "Bull" Connor, used high-pressure water hoses and police attack dogs on the children, students, and adult bystanders. The issue with the police using force was that the protestors were not being violent. The protestors were only attempting to bring attention and change to the discrimination and segregation of black people. Friedman and Richardson stated in their article that John F. Kennedy, the President of the United States, was sickened by the images of police brutality and fearful that without federal legislation the events of Birmingham would be repeated across the volatile south. Some scholars have credited the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to the Birmingham campaign and the negative publicity it received (2008:224). The negative publicity that the police received was the first of its kind in a way that it helped shape public policy. However, the influence of the media on public policy was microscopic during the Birmingham campaign compared to its current influence which has grown to include social media and movements such Black Lives Matter. In summary, the protests were successful and drew attention to the discrimination and segregation that was taking place in the South. Eugene Connor was also fired from his job and the movement spurred the Civil Rights Act of…
Societal points of view have been changing in the past and they always will, due to unfair treatment. The right way to go about reaching a civil solution is peaceful protest. I believe that peaceful protest positively impacts society. It’s all about perspective. Learning how to see things through another person’s point of view is always eye opening. If we go on never standing up for who we are, society will not progress. Now a day everyone wants to be treated fairly and given what they deserve, and if no one stands up to unfair, wrongful treatment, the world will be unbearable.…
Violent methods of protest were increasingly embraced by African Americans in the Civil Rights movement during the 1950s to 1960s because of frustration caused by the time consuming and ineffectiveness of peaceful non-violence. After the initial hype of non-violence during the 1955 Montgomery Bus Boycotts, non-violence eventually lost its influence as it was not yielding the results the African-Americans had hoped for. In addition to this, non-violence was met with police brutality and violence, making it dangerous to be involved in Civil Rights Movements and discouraging the participation in non-violence. Consequently, violent methods were seized by African Americans as they attracted widespread attention and were more effective in achieving short term goals, especially as violence was advocated strongly by figure heads such as Malcolm X and the Black Panthers.…
wanted to move the movement to Birmingham, Alabama. Birmingham was the most racist city in the south not to mention their violent history. Protestors clashed alongside King and said people will die, and they did. Nonetheless, King made the decision to send school children to the streets of Birmingham. He grasped the mood of the country was getting to the breaking point on the fight for civil rights. The chief of the Birmingham police unleashed his full force on harassing these young kids. The police hosed them down with water, let police dogs attack them, children were demoralized, and arrested. The events of the Birmingham protest were broadcast, on TV throughout the world. They were repelled and often compared the United States to Nazi Germany. The broadcast forced the Kennedy administration to confront the contradiction between the rhetoric of freedom and the reality of racism. King knew he had to keep the pressure to make things happen, as a result the March on Washington.…
Martin Luther King Jr. once said “The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy.” What he meant by these words is that by becoming violent in the pursuit of civil rights, it ultimately causes a loss of focus on the real issues. Martin Luther King was always against violence from his first protest in Montgomery to his death in 1968. He stressed that nonviolent direct action was what was needed to earn the rights and freedoms African Americans deserved. This way of protesting was a main factor in gaining support in the civil rights movement. Through media coverage of nonviolent protest the nation was shocked to see the abuse the protestors suffered. By using nonviolent…