Preview

Marx Vs Durkheim

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1607 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marx Vs Durkheim
The rise of Karl Marx and Émile Durkheim’s ideologies came when industrialization was on the rise in Europe. They both dissected this role of industrialization in the rising economic system of capitalism. They examined the demands of division of labor and what this subsequently did for the existing nature of society. Marx and Durkheim had differing opinions of the importance of the division of labor and rise of capitalism and how this either divided society or aided to its collective nature. This essay will take a look at each of the sociologist’s main differing ideologies, then we will bring it back together with their collective views of alienation and anomie.
Karl Marx is a conflict theorist. His work focuses on what conflicts arise in
…show more content…
According to Marx, capitalism and division of labor can cause alienation, this stems from “material conditions in which we apply our essential productive capacities (Appelrouth and Edles 2016:47)”. There are four different types of alienation explained in Marx’s “Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844”. The first being, the worker being alienated for what they are producing. The proletariat would not be able to afford what they are producing because it is only affordable to the bourgeoisie. The second type of alienation is the worker being alienated from the act of working itself. This is because the worker is doing very specific and minor acts within the grand scheme of production; this leads to the third type of alienation, which is the worker being alienated from being a “species being”. This is the lack of man living up to their full potential, isolating them from their own body and nature itself. The last form of alienation is alienating the worker and other workers. According to Marx this is a way to keep the proletariat oppressed and uneducated, never achieving “class consciousness” (Marx 1844:49-55). This source of alienation creates widespread devastation across the working class. The Proletariat is barely making enough to live a decent life, while the bourgeoisie is living in complete excess. This concept of alienation is very similar to Durkheim’s concept of anomie. He specifically looked at this in his work “Suicide”. This division of labor can lead to intense feelings of anomie. This comes in the form of lack of integration among society and lack of moral regulation. This intense isolation, or alienation, can leave one feeling totally alone, separated from their communities and their families. Durkheim asserts that a consequence of this is ammonic

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Émile Durkheim (1858 – 1917) was also a sociologist, social psychologist and philosopher like Mead, except, unlike Mead, he was French. His three major works include “The Division of Labor” (1893), “Suicide” (1897), and “The Elementary Forms of Religious Life” (1912) and he believed that they all explained a social phenomena. Durkheim’s theories were based on things that were external in nature as opposed to those that were internal in nature. The division of labor occurred when social organization shifted from being traditional (Mechanical Solidarity) to modern (Organic Solidarity). In the olden days, people were self-sufficient, feeding themselves and their families, bounded by similarities in religions, values, societal norms, occupations, backgrounds,… However, in the modern…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    men are separated from their creative faculties. When there’s increased dol, (car assembly line) they just do that all day. (or smith’s dol in pin factory. Efficient. But its disasterous for the human pschy.) ppl become alienated from their work product. Marx’s problem: value equals market value. Labor…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1) Estrangement of the worker from his product; Workers suffer from being ‘alienated’, and impoverishment due to the political economy of private ownership, society is divided into classes. “Political economy does not disclose the source of the division between labour and capital, and between capital and land” (p. 32).…

    • 2988 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the industrialization movement began, there was more of a blend between the classes, and now there is a distinct separation between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Because of the industrialization of the countries, the replacement of manual labor with the use of machinery and the division of labor, the work of the proletarian has become homogeneous. It does not contain the individuality or charm of the laborer as handmade goods do. The worker instead becomes part of the machine and is reduced to performing menial, repetitive tasks. Thus, the workman's pay rate reflects his work, and is reduced to minimum amount needed to barely sustain them. Therefore, as the skill needed to perform the job reduced, so does the amount of the wages. Also, as industrialization increases, so does drudge and toil. The worker become, in the eyes of the bourgeois in control, a part of the machine and as expendable and as easily replaced as any part of the machine. This is in the forms of prolonged work hours, amount of work done in a certain time, or by the increase of the speed of the machinery, which wears down and drains the workers.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capitalists employ workers and they work through putting their efforts and then getting paid for supporting their families. How hard they work, how much degree they lost themselves, the more products they would produce. They always want to manufacture high quality products, as a result, the higher quality the products, the more they consuming themselves, finally, they are not the person they should being themselves anymore, and they are treated badly, and they would become coward and blunt. Consequently, the workers are become slaves of capitalists. In the common condition, it is our instinct to think that the people who put effort to produce, who owns the product of labor; but under society of capitalism, the main force is private ownership, as a result, the workers’ efforts are nothing or meaningless to themselves. It only has significant impacts to the capitalists. Alienation may occur in the form that many industrials have highly specialized functions on the assembly line and none can do the full job. Which reminds me a condition in 19th in china, during 19 to 20 century, since china becomes an important exporter so the country is growing fast and emerges a lot of manufacturing and technologic industries, which means a manufacturing industry may have over ten thousand workers. They work hard and the process of production is complex and enormous. There is a technologic company in Shenzhen named Foxconn has almost eight hundred thousand employees in China, and always occur suicide incidents because of the intense working speed and nervous working environment. I think the workers in this company are overly devoting themselves to the company and finally lost themselves in their own…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The capitalist system caused the alienation of the workers, therefore causing them not to be able to live to the fullest…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Marx's Theory of Alienation

    • 2653 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Alienation, a concept that became widely known during the 19th and 20th century has been looked at extensively by a number of leading theorists. Theorists such as Georg Hegel first used the idea of alienation as a philosophic idea, but his work was later grasped upon by theorists known as Ludwig Feuerbach and more importantly Karl Marx. The world till now has been witness to a change in different social structures and forms in which society operates. We as human beings must ask, what purpose do we serve within society? What means do we have to sustain an effective or prosperous way of living? Marx believed we have been through different economic stages and ownership of the things we need to live, beginning with the times of the ancient to feudalism (land granted from the crown) to now where we have arrived at capitalism (private ownership). He saw this as historical stages of development where each stage has the characteristics of a system of production and division of labour, forms of property ownership and a system of class relations (Morrison,K.1995:40). This brought forward Marx’s idea of historical materialism which centred on how to interpret the history of mankind and the development of one stage of society to the next. In turn it looks for reasons for changes in human society and how humans together produced the necessary requirements to live. In relation to historical materialism there was another idea of dialectal materialism. This was a term used by Marx to study natural phenomena, the evolution of society and human thought itself as a process of development which rests upon motion and contradiction (Clapp,R: Acc 10/11/2012). Marx further explains historical and dialectical materialism which will be looked at further in the essay. By understanding how humans produce the necessities to live (historical materialism) and how a way of reasoning helps us to see the growth…

    • 2653 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Race Class Gender

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. the alienated labor is when” private property and its owners hires and controls others and defines labor for them” Instead of results of one’s labor benefiting one’s self, the labor becomes a function that benefits the property owners (184). Therefore, capitalist get to hold on to their money by the “means of production”(184). In a capitalist society Owners vs. non-owners, conflict the rises between the “haves” and the “have not’s” are inevitable. Class structure is maintained by 3 mechanisms; State (ruling class asserting their common interest 185), Ideology (Ideas that support and legitimizes the position of capitalist 185) and the capitalist structure itself due to custom an training views the condition of capitalism a normal process and creates a dependency of workers on the system which makes it hard to resist or rebel. For Ma0rx the important issues structure of economic relations that drives everything else(185, 186. His ideology correlates with contemporary society because of the overabundance of productions which then leads to bankruptcy (2009 housing crisis)(188).…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx and Emilie Durkheim both try to make sense of modern society using sociological theories, but in very different ways. Both Marx and Durkheim’s theories are structural, meaning that society functions within social constraints that have been set prior to individuals birth. Free will is controlled and kept within the norms the structure has set. The difference between Marx and Durkheim however, is that Marx’s theory is one of conflict while Durkheim’s is one of consensus. This difference leads to the points this essay will be comparing.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    *As we noted previously, Marx saw both alienation and class conflict as inevitable (or “normal”) in capitalist societies. By contrast, rather than seeing social conflict as a “normal” condition of capitalism, Durkheim maintained that anomie results only in “abnormal” conditions of overspecialization, when the rules of capitalism become too rigid and individuals are “forced” into a particular position in the division of labor.…

    • 2127 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I was not aware that we would have to create the most dysfunctional democracy I have ever seen, and then repair it from there. Durkheim's theory of the division of labor focuses around individuals doing what they are good at, and in turn, mastering that craft. This works in a rural society, but as a society progresses and increases in size, the necessity of a division of labor focused around keeping society functioning proves to be more important than making sure you "love your job" as Durkheim believes you should, but as society progresses, a conscience collective is necessary for society to function. Marx's theory focuses more around the fact that individuals are focused around their social class and material possessions rather than the conscience collective. Alienation from the division of labor can take place but allowing that to happen is not how a conscience collective would work out the division of labor. Durkheim's focus around improving people's skills and creating a sense of solidarity versus Marx's focus around doing what you have to since their social class above you will never let you move up into their socioeconomic class. Although alienation may not be the correct way to describe Marx's theory, the resentment that individuals feel towards a particular task is very possible but loving your job as Durkheim says is also…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (To be fair, Schwartz doesn’t mention that many work harder for more money too.) So there is a cost to what Karl Marx called alienated labor. “Too often, instead of being able to take pride in what they do, and derive satisfaction from doing it well, workers have little to show for their efforts aside from their pay.”…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx Vs Durkheim

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This essay will look at violence both in general and against women through theories by Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx. The article being looked at is “Hidden rise in violent crime driven by growth in violence against women” (Gayle 2016, n.p), the article brings attention to crimes against women being on the rise, both reported and unreported. The article also claims that the rise begins at the start of a financial crisis in the UK. This essay will look at the causes and control of crime in the exploitation, injustice, and class conflict in capitalist society. It will draw on and differentiate relationships between social structure and the organization of law and punishment and investigate the social causes of crime, and social deviance.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Durkheim is a functionalist who sees a society as an interdependent organ, it cannot function on its own and division of labour brings about permanent feelings of mutual dependence amongst the people in the society and his perspective’s main aim was to support that division of labour is a pillar for social order (Giddens, 1998: 184), however Marx does not embrace it as much, to him division of labour is like cancer that gets into a human body and destroys it entirely, with no committed function of the life-host, and whose decoupled appropriation of its nutrients deprives the life-host of what it requires to sustain its vital functions(Kahn, 1981: 132). Marx acknowledges…

    • 2126 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Durkheim did not think Capitalism was as bad as Marx believed it to be, but Durkheim had the advantage of seeing how Capitalism played. Durkheim thought that the division of labor (economic specialization or specialization of labor) was necessary for society to progress and advance. He acknowledged alienation, but argued that it was very rare for this to happen. Progress and advancement was the good that came out of the political and social transformations in the 1800’s, but the preventable deaths and mistreatment of people were some of the bad things that happened for the good to occur. Durkheim was concerned with social solidarity, or the togetherness of social groups.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays