Preview

Marx & Weber

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1559 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marx & Weber
Class & Inequalities – Marx & Weber

Most societies throughout the world have developed a notion of social class. It refers to hierarchical distinctions between individuals or groups within society. How these social classes have been determined has been a common topic among social scientists throughout time. Two individuals have headed this long standing debate, Karl Marx and Marx Weber. Karl Marx, on the one hand, ideas about class are still influential in many cultures around the world. On the other hand Max Weber is considered one of the fathers of modern thought and one of the most influential persons in the world of intellect. Despite their clear similarities, such as both coming from a European protestant background, they have distinct differences that are very important to note. Karl Marx’s theory regarding worker alienation and the uneven distribution of capital has the greater number of parallels with today’s society.
Marx-
In Marxist theory, human society consists of two parts: the base and superstructure; the base comprehends the forces and relations of production — employer-employee work conditions, the technical division of labour, and property relations — into which people enter to produce the necessities and amenities of life. These relations determine society’s other relationships and ideas, which are described as its superstructure. The superstructure of a society includes its culture, institutions, political power structures, roles, rituals, and state. The base determines (conditions) the superstructure, yet their relation is not strictly causal, because the superstructure often influences the base; the influence of the base, however, predominates. For Marx class relationships are embedded in production relationships; more specifically, in the patterns of ownership and control which characterize these relationships. Marx believed that the bourgeoisie use a mode of production in the form of capitalism to oppress the proletariat, the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx’ theory of the relations of production can be used as an important platform in locating the origins of class and gender inequity to the early stages of capitalism. In his theory ‘the relations of production’ he explained that private ownership of…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Today in society as many people know there are many ways to categorize people into different “social classes.” There has been many people who have tried and had labels for people in each “social class.” However, Karl Marx and Max Weber are well known in sociology classes for having certain criteria to classify people into their classes. We see that Both Marx and Weber has offered theoretical descriptions of how people are stratified into “social classes.”…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article presents Weber’s argument regarding social stratification in contrast to Marx’s. In his discussion of his theory of social stratification, he outlines three ways in which society is divided: by class (economically), status (socially) and by party (ideologically). He argues that the individual identity is not determined by the class identity, and that status and party identities often cross class divisions.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxist ideology is based on the idea of two distinct socio-economic classes—the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Marx defines the bourgeoisie as a wealthy and capitalistic class whose economic supremacy arises from and relies on owning the means of production and preserving capital. Contrarily, the proletariat is a class of wage laborers whose only power lies in their ability to sustain themselves through work, for they do not have access to the “instruments of production.” The bourgeoisie class is comprised of industrial millionaires who exploit the laboring proletariat masses to ensure the perpetuation of their dominance and status at the top of the hierarchy. According to Marx, societal conflict between the classes has always existed and the…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Browne et al (2009), Karl Marx (1818-83) theorised that class was determined by a number of factors including income and the relationship that a certain group had to the means of production. He saw society to be divided into two groups, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie employed the proletariat to work for them and used the workers labour to produce their surplus value, in turn only paying the workers the minimalist amount needed to survive, therefore making a greater profit whilst exploiting the proletariat. According to Moore et al (2009), Marx argued that the conflict between the powerless, poor majority and the rich, powerful minority was a strong driving force of most societies.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx and Max Weber speak about capitalism and social class. They both agree that modern methods of organization have tremendously increased the effectiveness and efficiency of production. However they both have different concept of theories. Karl Marx speaks about Alienation and Critique of Capitalism .Marx argued that this alienation of human work is precisely the defining feature of capitalism. He regards alienation as product of the evolution of division of labor, private property and the state: When these phenomena reach an advanced stage, as in capitalist society the individual experiences the entire objective world as a conglomerate of alien forces standing over and above them. Marx with Hegelian notion of alienation but developed a materialist concept. For Marx the possibility that one may give up ownership of one’s own labor, one’s capacity to transform the world- is tantamount to being alienation from ones own nature; it is a spiritual loss. Marx noted that alienation can only be overcome by revolutionary abolition of the economic system based on private property.…

    • 3000 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The “crude” or simplest Marxist model of society is that it is made up by a base (which is the supply of the means of production) and a superstructure, the ““cultural” world of ideas, art, religion, and law” (Barry 151), which is shaped by the base.…

    • 992 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the nineteenth century, Karl Marx and Max Weber were two of the most influential sociologist. Both their views on the rise of capitalism have various similarities and differences. They believe that capitalism is relatively new to the modern world. Their views differ on the rise of capitalism. Regardless of Marx and Weber 's differences, both theorists agree that capitalism is a system of highly impersonal relations.…

    • 4179 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx Durkheim Weber

    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages

    6. Critically examine the specific methods used by Marx, Durkheim, Weber for the analysis of social forces and relations in modern society.…

    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx and Weber

    • 2906 Words
    • 12 Pages

    A strong discrepancy in interpretation of religions exists between the two great thinkers, Marx and Weber, in that Marx saw religions as “the opiate of the masses” (Marx, 1843:42) meaning that religions justify believers’ bitter lives and make them passive whereas Weber saw religions as having power to bring about not just social but economic changes (Jong Seo, 2005:231). On top of that, Marx believed that the religion is a dependent variable determined by the substructure- materialistic and economic conditions. Weber, in contrast, assumed that the religion played a role in enlightening or changing people’s thoughts and behaviors unconsciously, causing them to embrace a new way of living such as capitalism. These contrasts derive from the fact that these two intellectuals approached the religions from different perspectives. Most of Marx’s reasoning reveals the characteristics of methodological holism while Weber focused more on individuals and held on to the idea that individuals’ motives and philosophy are the source of changes and revolutions- methodological individualism.…

    • 2906 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx and Weber

    • 3871 Words
    • 13 Pages

    In spite of their undeniable differences, Marx and Weber have much in common in their understanding of modern capitalism: they both perceive it as a system where "the individuals are ruled by abstractions (Marx), where the impersonal and "thing-like" (Versachlicht) relations replace the personal relations of dependence, and where the accumulation of capital becomes an end in itself, largely irrational.…

    • 3871 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stratification Theory- Weber

    • 5447 Words
    • 20 Pages

    While this should come as no great surprise if you've been studying sociology for some time (and I would suggest that it's probably a good idea to have gained some experience in handling sociological ideas and concepts before you attempt to tackle the concept of social stratification in any depth) - sociologists frequently interpret evidence in radically different ways - it should alert you to the fact that there are a number of clear differences between the ideas, arguments and conclusions put forward by Weber and Marx in relation to social stratification. The task of these Notes, therefore, is to help you understand and evaluate both Weber's ideas and their relationship to Marxist ideas.…

    • 5447 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Karl Marx published several books, developed new theories, and made many other significant contributions to society. One of his most famous works was The Communist Manifesto. In this essay, Karl Marx argues that class struggles between the bourgeoisie and proletarians. Marx believed that all property should be publically owned. There would be no government, and everyone would work together for the good of the community. Thus, the society would be classless and stateless (Heilbroner 157). Marx's theories about society, economics, and politics, commonly known as Marxism, say that all societies progress through the dialectic of class struggle. His theory of Marxism had three component parts: dialectical materialism, historical materialism, and Marxist economics (Sewell). It is a conflict between an ownership class, which controls production and a lower class which produces the labor for goods. Another one of his famous works of literature is Das Kapital. In this book, Marx argues that…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxist on Education

    • 1463 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Marxists perceive a capitalist society is being ruled by the economy. The minority, the ruling class or 'bourgeoisie' rule the majority, namely the workers or 'proletariat'. The bourgeoisie have the wealth and the power to rule whereas the proletariats are capitalized on, hence, not treated fairly. This results in inequality among the classes. In addition, Marxists believe that institutions such as organised religion, the mass media, the political and the education systems all support the ideology that the rich and powerful should dominate society. They encouraged the ideology or belief that society is fair and just and that the proletariat should just tolerate and accept the capitalist society. A capitalist society is one in which natural resources and the means of producing goods and services are privately owned (Macionis & Plummer, 2008). Marx argues that the high growth of this wealth is as a result of the masses, proletariat, being exploited. He also debated that the conflict between classes brings about such consequence and this will eventually revolutionize the capitalist society into a class- less society.…

    • 1463 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism (Sociology)

    • 2198 Words
    • 9 Pages

    AQA AS/A SOCIOLOGY ESSAY: CRITICALLY EXAMINE MARXIST PERSPECTIVES ON TODAY’S SOCIETY Classical Marxism is a conflict structural theory which argues that, rather than society being based on value consensus as functionalists would contend, there is a conflict of interest between different groups (social classes) because of the unequal distribution of power and wealth. Marxists are also interested in the way in which social change can occur, particularly in sudden and revolutionary ways. However, there are differences between Marxists especially over the way which social change can come about. For example, humanistic Marxists like Gramsci give a greater role to the conscious decisions and actions of human beings than do structural Marxists like Althusser, for whom social change comes as the product of changes within the structures of society. One of the key ideas of Marx was historical materialism. Materialism is the view that human beings have material needs such as food, clothing and shelter, and must therefore work to meet them. In so doing, they use the forces or means of production. In the earliest stages of human history, these forces were just unaided human labour, but over time people develop tools, machines and so on to assist in production i.e. there are innovations in technology. In working to meet their needs, humans also cooperate with one another: they enter into social relations of production – ways of organising production. Over time, as the forces of production grow and develop, so do the social relations of production change. In particular, a division of labour develops, and this eventually gives rise to a division between two social classes: a ruling class that owns the means of production and a subject class of labourers. From then on, production is directed by the ruling class to meet their own needs. Marx argued that in any class-based society – be it ancient, feudal or capitalist – one group gained at the expense of the other. According to Marx,…

    • 2198 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays