Preview

Marxism Crime & Deviance

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1784 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marxism Crime & Deviance
Crime and Deviance

This essay will evaluate the Marxist theory that the ruling class in society decides the law and enforces it, to reflect their own interests.
Marxism is a political and social system based on the ideas of Karl Marx (1818-83). Marxist criminology theories began in the 1970’s. According to Marxists, society is controlled by the ruling capitalist class. They believe that in a capitalist society, a small group of wealthy people (the bourgeoisie), own the means of production, such as; factories, businesses, land, etc and that they exploit the working class people (the proletariat), so that they can enjoy a huge profit and personal gain, either legally or illegally. Marxists believe that the ruling class therefore decide the law help their own personal interests and needs. Reflecting this Marxist theory, P. Self states that “crime is an inevitable feature of a capitalist economy which promotes self interest and greed”. So Marxists argue that working-class people are more likely to break the law because of exploitation and poverty. Crimes of the rich and powerful bourgeoisie can frequently go undetected because of the state and large businesses help each other. Individuals may also be labelled as ‘deviant’, simply because they might be involved in political acts that challenge the social order. Marxists believe that laws cannot be ‘neutral ‘, because they are made by the powerful to maintain their own privileged positions.
Marxists therefore argue that capitalism is crimogenic – it is the single over-riding cause of all crime and deviancy in society due to poverty, unemployment and lack of opportunity. A poor underclass is formed who have to rely on crime to exist. However they also say the ruling classes themselves are deviant, by committing crimes that protect their power and wealth. Capitalist led governments turn a blind eye to this. William Chambliss’ study in 1976 illustrated this when he described organised crime in Washington, U.S.A.



References: ‘Power, Crime and Mystification ‘ Steven Box Tavistock Publications 1983 ‘Investigating Crime and Deviance Stephen Moore Collins 1988 ‘Understanding Occupational Crime’ Hazel Croall OUP 2001 ‘On Analyzing Crime’ Sutherland Univ. of Chicago Press 1973. (

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Marxist sociologists utilise Marxist concepts in order to provide a framework for understanding the cause and effects of crime and deviance in a capitalist society. These sociologists see power as being controlled by those who own and maintain the means of production. The superstructure of a capitalist society the agencies of social control, the law, politics as well as crime all reflect and serve ruling-class interests.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism is an example of the conflicting view as they argue that the law and social rules reflect the interests of the rich and powerful groups in society who have managed to impose their ideas and way of thinking on the wider population through coercion and ideological control. Therefore they are able to get their assumptions of crime to stick as opposed to the opinions of an ordinary person on the street.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Radical Criminology is a conflict that bases its perspectives on crime and law in the belief that capitalist societies define crime as the owners of the means of production use their power to enact laws that will control the working class and repress threats to the power of the ruling class. It is there to make governments aware of various crimes they commit against human rights and national laws. It might view modern society because they believe the police are serving the needs of the elite few at the expense of the majority. Crimes of the low income and working class result from political decisions which result in the choices of political workers. It states that the causes of crime can be found in social conditions that empower the wealthy…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxist theorists suggest that the workings of society can be explained by the concept of exploitation – the ruling class exploit the working class. This is the fundamental point by which Chambliss pointed to explore the relationship between class and crime. Traditional Marxists imply that the judiciary system is beneficial to the ruling class only. This dominant ideology disseminates through agencies such as, education, media, and religion which is forced onto individuals, this process is known as hegemony.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are numerous Marxist theories that help us to understand crime and deviance in different ways, however they are all based around the same ideas. They believe capitalism causes crime in three different ways including, selective law enforcement, criminogenic capitalism and ideological nature of the law.…

    • 1983 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Marxist theory of alienation however is another factor that sociologists have recognised. Marxist theorise that young, impressionable adolescences often feel pressurised by those in power who often use the law to benefit themselves and are therefore forced in to demeaning work. Due to this, many turn to crime in order to be able to control what they do but also get certain objects that they may not have been able to receive should they have stayed on the other side of the law, objects which the rich and powerful are usually the only ones to receive. Therefore,…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assess the usefulness of Marxist approaches to an understanding of crime and deviance (21 marks)…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Class in Australia

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Class and class conflict in Australia, Kuhn and O’Lincoln address struggles of working class from an economic standpoint in relation to crime, suggesting Australian working class, due to their status from birth are more likely to end up in prison. “Working class crime is the most conspicuous because of the relative powerlessness of individual workers” (What Marx wanted to effect and transform with his manifesto through a communist revolution)…

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxists idea of crime is strongly linked to capitalism and the way it creates conditions for crime through exploitation and competition. There are two branches of Marxism; traditional and Neo-Marxism. They both focus on the idea of criminogenic state, however Neo-Marxist theory links in with the labelling theory to explain crime.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Timmer's Definition of Law

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “A definition of crime represents the legal conditions under which the state, as an instrument of an economically dominant class, exercises its power to punish.” I feel that the state maintains the capitalist order through laws. Primarily, control is done through the governing of consciousness of the population. The ruling class gives rise to their own ideology to protect themselves. Capitalism’s most subtle means of control is to try and manipulate the minds of the people. They try to dictate the future through the people’s thinking and overall living. This type of dictatorship is cultural, psychological, economic and political. When an existing order becomes threatened, the focus on crime rises. The ruling class diverts attention and gains validation for utilization of criminal sanctions to regain stability. The public, must feel that their interests are being protected, not only the ruling class alone. In doing this the state works to serve the interests of the capitalist ruling class.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Civil Action - Movie

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Karl Marx sided with three principles regarding law and how it relates to the upper and lower classes in society. They are: law is a product of evolving economic forces; law is a tool used by the ruling class to maintain its power over the lower class and the means of production are owned by the ruling class. Marx believed that law is a structure of power. In this case the victims of families were the working class and the powerful corporations such as Beatrice Foods and W.R. Grace and Company are the ruling class. These two companies own their means of production meaning they do not need resources from others in order to keep their businesses running smoothly.…

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Left Realism

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Furthermore, like Marxists, Left Realists accept that structural inequalities and perceptions of injustice are the major causes of crime. However, Young believed that the left idealists (Marxists and neo-Marxists) ignored the importance of street crime in their research. Left Realists found through victim surveys, that the sort of crime that worries people most is primarily street crime like ‘mugging’, violence, car crime and burglary, which is mainly performed by young working-class males, both black and white. The main victims of these offences, and those who have the highest fears about crime, are the poor, the deprived, the ethnic minorities and inner-city residents. They recognize that most people don’t care much about white- collar or corporate crime, as it has little impact on their lives.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflict Criminology

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How critical criminology works is by explaining how criminal social conduct is the result of economic and social inequalities, favoritism in the law and the effects of the capitalist system in society. This criminological view decreases the focus on a person’s own individual crimes but it looks heavy upon the existing crime in society as a consequence of the capitalist system affect in the country. In a capitalist system, production and economic wealth become every person focus, it ignores the needs of those who are under privileged while expressing to the public that money is the way to have a successful life thus encouraging criminal conduct in order to gain economic succession. In its opinion, and in the opinions of most critical criminologist, critical criminology believes that the rule of law no longer is equal to everyone but it instead favors the privileged (also known as the upper class) people in society and wretchedly politics and the legal system that governs the society is no longer meant to serve everyone but instead it is used to uphold/preserve the reputation of upper-class citizens. Through a critical criminologist observation, governmental company and corporate settings have continuous sprees of unreported crimes but also when the crimes are noticed by the public since it is the upper-class committing these criminal acts they are not punished as harshly under the law as a underprivileged member of society would have…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Traditional Marxists would argue that law making and law enforcement only serves the interests of the ruling class. Chambliss argued that laws to protect private property are the cornerstone of capitalist society. His argument was in regards to a case studied in Britain’s east African colonies. The British introduced a cash tax that if unpaid was a criminal offence, knowing that the Africans economy was not based on money; they had no choice but to work on the plantation and pay the tax. The evidence clearly shows us how the bourgeoisie who owned the plantation exploited the working class, since the only way the Africans could make money was to work on the plantation the owners were acquiring free labour and tax from them. Thus clearly portraying how law is indeed an instrument of the ruling class. Likewise, Mankoff argued that the vast majority of the population have no power or say in the creation of laws and punishment, thus further illustrating how law is an instrument of the ruling class.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First, all norms-especially laws of any society-generally reflect interests of the rich and powerful. People who threaten the wealthy are likely to be labeled deviant, whether it's by taking people's property or advocating a more political radical society. Karl Marx's social conflict approach, argues the law and all social institutions support the interests of the rich. However, Richard Quinney states, "Capitalist justice is by the capitalist class, for the capitalist class, and against the working class."…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics