Because of his mother who was conditioned to love the World State, John was expecting a grand new world that resembled a heaven on Earth. Once he actually leaves the savage reservation and goes to London John is hit with the reality of the World State, which is one not nearly close to perfection. His argument against the state is obvious during his, Bernard’s, and Helmholtz’s conversation with Mustapha Mond when John says, "Yes, that's just like you. Getting rid of everything unpleasant instead of learning to put up with it. Whether 'tis better in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, or to take arms against a sea of troubles and by opposing end them … But you don't do either. Neither suffer nor oppose. You just abolish the slings and arrows. It's too easy" (Huxley, 162). Here John is saying that in the World State life is too simple, too easy, but that isn’t the problem has with it. John is saying that by taking away the struggles in the world, the World State has also taken away the things that are really worth living for, things such as love, because in order to get such things you have to fight for them,
Because of his mother who was conditioned to love the World State, John was expecting a grand new world that resembled a heaven on Earth. Once he actually leaves the savage reservation and goes to London John is hit with the reality of the World State, which is one not nearly close to perfection. His argument against the state is obvious during his, Bernard’s, and Helmholtz’s conversation with Mustapha Mond when John says, "Yes, that's just like you. Getting rid of everything unpleasant instead of learning to put up with it. Whether 'tis better in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, or to take arms against a sea of troubles and by opposing end them … But you don't do either. Neither suffer nor oppose. You just abolish the slings and arrows. It's too easy" (Huxley, 162). Here John is saying that in the World State life is too simple, too easy, but that isn’t the problem has with it. John is saying that by taking away the struggles in the world, the World State has also taken away the things that are really worth living for, things such as love, because in order to get such things you have to fight for them,