Preview

Marxism vs Functionalism

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1925 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marxism vs Functionalism
In this assignment I was asked to look at my society and how I view it, analyse it, understand it and evaluate it. With theories and theorist on society available I will focus on two of the theories which are Marxism by Karl Marx & Functionalism by Skinner. Karl Marx, the man was a genius. The man was not blind, most people are blind, we look but we cannot see and when we do see, we change how we see to make ourselves feel better or we change and explain things so we can have some sort of illusion of control over the situation. That is what we do as humans we try and control every aspect of our lives, we have a curse and that is the curse of choice so being told that we are not the controllers of our destinies is something that we cannot comprehend and that is what Karl Marx said. According to Marx we live in an illusion of false consciousness, we like to believe that it’s all fair ground so play ball. We tell our children that if they work hard then they can be the prime minister or whatever they want to be and that unfortunately is not the case.
In today’s society we are split, we live in a society where 1% rules over the 99%, we are the 99%, the teachers, the policeman, the petty bourgeoisie and the students. We know this yet we accept it. The workers work and the bosses get rich and the bosses look at the workers as replaceable commodities that are there to be an asset and to be done away with as soon as they start negatively affecting the profit margin. These are the views of Karl Marx and they are endorsed in his theory of Marxism, one of the two theories that I will be comparing.
We are all working together towards reaching a goal. As a society we are part of the same body that is working to maintain its self and better yourself, this is the viewpoint of functionalism, it states that “society is depicted as a more or less harmonious and integrated ‘whole’ with every social constitution serving a particular function” taylor,p,1995.sociology in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The major theoretical perspective are known as Functionalist perspective, Conflict perspective, and Interactionist perspective. These three views are the ones most widely used by sociologists, which altogether will approach and provide an introductory look at the discipline. Some iconic sociologists such as Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, Karl Marx, W.E.B. DuBois and many others are major contributors to sociology. Functionalist perspective emphasizes the way in which the parts of a society are structured to maintain its stability. The functionalist perspective sees stability and agreement while the conflict sociologist sees the world as a continual struggle. Conflict perspective assumes that social behavior is best understood in terms of tension between groups over power or the allocation of resources, including housing, money, access to services, and political representation.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The bourgeoisie, as Marx has described them are not revolutionary simply because it is in their best interest for things to remain as they are. For the workers, both socially and geographically divided; a gap that is constantly fluctuating in modern times, to compete for smaller and smaller wages that are losing their…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 7 Sociology

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is basically the basis of capitalist society; Marx sees this as an evil society that must come to an end. In order for society to overcome a capitalist society the worker need to realize that they’re being exploited, they should unite and fight against their exploitation through revolution and replace the evil capitalist system with a…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This created a disparity between the rich and the working poor. This stage in society separation, known as socialism and marked by unequal pay for the work performed, is the intermediate stage between capitalism and communism, according to German philosopher and revolutionary socialist Karl Marx’s theory “The Communist Manifest”. (“Karl Marx” 2011) Marx described Communism “as a society in which each person should contribute according to their ability and receive according to their need”. (“Karl Marx” 2011)…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalism is seen as a macro-scale approach to society; it sees society as a whole rather than looking at parts of it. Due to this, functionalism sees society as a body (organic analogy), all the institutions work together to make society. This is particularly useful when observing society in order to understand the way in which it functions and the way in which all the institutions (organic analogy: organs within the body) work together to sustain society as a whole. Functionalism being a macro-scale approach is therefore seen as a strength as it allows functionalist sociologists to observe society, and its institutions, as a whole. Functionalism is also seen as a consensus theory, it sees society as fair and just, and it acknowledges that many societies, including the majority of western ones, have democracy and all individuals within a particular society share the same or similar norms and values. This could therefore be seen as a strength as it acknowledges that democracy does exist in many societies.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Society is a human group where a cultural bond is shared. This can be due to shared values, culture, norms, roles, and geographical location. A society can have a shared culture, but also remain stratified and be unequal. Stratification is the separation of humans into hierarchies. Conflict Sociologists argue that there is a conflict in society due to different groups having different interests. Theories such as Marxism and feminism, as mentioned in Item B, are both conflict theories that argue differently the causality of conflict. This conflict therefore leads to inequality. Whereas consensus theories, such as functionalism, view society as a structure caused by co-operation between different social groups. CONCLUSIVE STATEMENT,…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Karl Marx, the struggle between the upper class, the bourgeoisie and the lower class, the proletariat, has always been a constant conflict throughout history. The bourgeoisie controlled all means of production and continuously oppressed the proletariat, which was unfair because the proletariats were the ones doing hard labor, yet the bourgeoisie gained all of the benefits. Marx believed that in order to end this class struggle, class distinctions would need to be eliminated. In order for everybody in society to be considered equal, there could be no private ownership of materials. If private ownership of materials were allowed, then some people would have more things than other people which would create another class and thus another conflict. Therefore, an equalized society would get rid of all conflict. Marxism has been…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx developed the idea of Marxism (a conflict theory between Upper and Lower social classes) in the 18th Century, when social classes were very clearly defined- the ‘Bourgeois’ and the ‘Proletariat’. For this very reason, what is known as ‘Traditional Marxism’ is now quite evidently outdated, mainly due to the emergence of the ‘Middle Class’ throughout the 20th Century and the ‘Digital Revolution’ also in the late 20th and 21st Century, which has blurred the lines between the different social classes, particularly the ‘Digital Revolution’ which has seen the birth of the Post-Modernist theory of Pick ’n’ Mix Identity, in effect allowing people to ‘choose’ their ‘Class’. Due to these reasons, Marxism has developed and produced more relevant theories.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx and Adam Smith

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In contrast, Karl Marxl reasoned that workers would be broken by any capitalist, or factory owners, because he believed that a capitalist system provides an advantage for the rich and a disadvantage for the poor. The rich would get richer and the poor would get poorer. Furthermore, the “capitalist” is always in a better position to negotiate a low wage for his workers, he argued. One of his notable and more arguable theories claims that the value of a good or service is directly connected to the amount of labor required for its production. Interestingly, Karl Marx also had his own drastic, political ideas that were far away from those of Adam Smith’s.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marxist View

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Marxist sees ‘all social institutions as serving the interests of capitalism’. This including the family, it suggests that they help to maintain and justify capitalism by reinforcing class inequality and exploitation from the rich. Another opinion on this is the functionalist approach in which they think the family performs the essential needs of the society. Both Marxist and functionalist ideas contrast as functionalists see society based on value consensus in which everyone agrees whereas Marxists believes that there is an unequal balance of classes.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism is a useful conflict theory in helping us to understand why there was obedience, particularly in the past in society. Marx saw negativity within the economy; he believed that the functioning and running of society was based upon the economy. Because of this, Marx states why there is a divide between the proletariat (working class who have only their skills to sell) and the bourgeoisie (the ruling class who own the means of production). The bourgeoisie cannot operate without the proletariat, as they cannot produce products, and similarly the proletariat cannot operate without the bourgeoisie, as they need them so they can be paid a wage and feed their families. On the other hand, this can be viewed from a different perspective. However it can be argued that these people may have not left their jobs is because they could have been in a state of false consciousness, whereby they were unaware of their exploitation by the bourgeoisie. This helps us to understand society as the Marxism theory provides reasoning on how the bourgeoisie were able to exploit the proletariat, which in turn powered capitalism and allowed the ruling elite to maintain their profits. It is also relevant to today’s society, as it helps to explain why many people who are in a low paid job (e.g. Factory workers) do not leave, despite hating their job, and this is because they need the money to survive. On the other hand radical social change would be inevitable according to Marx, society would enter a final period- communism. However this can be criticized as capitalism has only…

    • 881 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism is an ideology based on the economic and political theories of Karl Marx and Freidrich Engels. Karl Marx who was born in Germany in 1818 was a revolutionary whose ideas on society were the foundation of communism. Under modern capitalism the means of production, such as factories, land, and technology are controlled by a small minority who Marx called the bourgeoisie. Production is carried out by the working class, known as the proletarians who have to sell their labour or face poverty or starvation. Taken together these two classes form the economic base of society, what Marx called the substructure. Marx saw that there was conflict between these two divisions and that this could only be resolved by a revolution, which would lead to a classless society, where the means of production would be held collectively. All Marx’s theories use social class as a starting point for analysis. In this essay we will explore two areas where Marx’s theories have had influence, crime and deviance and education. Marx saw the bourgeoisie as controlling these institutions. Marxists believe that these institutions form part of the superstructure of society with the economy as its base.…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay I am going to compare and contrast Functionalism and Marxism. They are both sociological perspectives which have theories about society and the people that live within it. They attempt to explain how society influences people, and similarly how people influence society. However, the two perspectives are clearly different.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism Vs Functionalism

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This essay will be mainly focused on the similarities and the differences in two sociological perspectives which are the Marxist and the Functionalist approach when it comes to health and illness, also will define the definition of them.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nature of humanity was seen as selfish but rational. Man needed the power of society to restrain and control him. Society was seen as a compelling force and early structuralists such as Hobbes and Durkheim emphasised the power of society and the relative lack of power of mankind to control it. The emphasis of the earliest writers in the tradition, Comte, Spencer and Durkheim, shows a concern with the need for order and harmonious integration in social life. It is their work which has formed the basis of the work by Parsons and others in the USA. This writing forms the basis of the functionalist perspective and has been very influential in the thought and research of Sociology in that country though functionalism has been less influential in modern European thought.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays