Preview

Masciantonio Case Note and Critique

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1100 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Masciantonio Case Note and Critique
Case Note & CritiqueMasciantonio v The Queen (1995) 183 CLR 58
Case Note
Appellant: Mr. Giovanni MasciantonioRespondent: The Queen
Court & Year: High Court of Australia 1994 - 1995
Relevant Facts: Appeal from the Supreme Court of Victoria.
19 June 1991 Giovanni Masciantonio had a heated altercation with his son-in-law Maurizio Femia.
Altercation resulted in Mr. Femia’s life.
Fatal wound being a severed aorta (known as wound 5).
Giovanni Masciantonio was convicted of murder in the Supreme Court of Victoria.
O’Bryan J trial judge.
The defence argued provocation.
An appeal was put before the Court of Criminal Appeal Victoria.
Reason for the appeal was that the judge had failed to mention provocation to the jury regarding the second stage of the incident. That this failure was a miscarriage of justice.
Crockett, Marks & Ormiston JJ – Court of Criminal Appeal.
Crockett & Marks JJ agreed with the O’Bryan J decision.
Ormiston J believed that provocation should not have been a defence at all.
November 1994 appealed to High Court of Australia on special leave.
Brennan, Deane, Dawson, Gaudron and McHugh JJ.
Appellant put forward that considering the circumstances of the history between Masciantonio and his son-in-law that any ordinary person would have lacked self-control.
McHugh J put forward that the fatal wound could not be determined as to whether it was caused in the first instance or the second instance, and that the wording used by O’Bryan J was reflective of whether or not the jury found the Appellant had inflicted the fatal blow in the first or second instances and that if that the jury had in fact found that the appellant had inflicted the fatal blow in the first instance that provocation could not be a defence in the second instance.
McHugh J concluded that the appeal should be dismissed.
Brennan, Deane, Dawson and Gaudron JJ agreed together that given the evidence, that the Appellant may have still been lacking in



Bibliography: R v Lindsay [2014] SASCFC 56. Stingel v The Queen (1990) 171 CLR 312. Graham Virgo (1994). Basics to Basics—Reconstructing Manslaughter. The Cambridge Law Journal, 53, pp 44-53. "Australia: New Laws to Simplify Jury Directions." MENA Report (Dec 14, 2012). <http://search.proquest.com/docview/1238344180?accountid=16285>. Bottomley, Stephen, Simon Bronitt, ‘Law in Context’ (The Federation Press, 4th ed, 2012).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Procedural History: Lower court entered a directed verdict for Dr. Turk b/c there was an absence of evidence that he intended to inflict personal injury…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Issue No. 1: In the appeal you state Lt. J. Ratliff was your hearings officer and that he had prior knowledge regarding details of your offense. Response: Alternate hearings officer Lt. Ratliff would have had knowledge about your offense due to preparations for hearing of this infraction; which would deem this issue irrelevant.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    (A) No person, while under the influence of sudden passion or in a sudden fit of rage, either of which is brought on by serious provocation occasioned by the victim that is reasonably sufficient to incite the person into using deadly force, shall knowingly cause the death of another.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7.What other inconsistencies were found in the case when the evidence was re-examined? Why do you think these inconsistencies were ignored at the time of the Crippen trial?…

    • 339 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crippen Case

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages

    7. What other inconsistencies were found in the case when the evidence was re-examined? Why do you think these inconsistencies were ignored at the time of the Crippen trial?…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Module two lab questions

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages

    7. What other inconsistencies were found in the case when the evidence was re-examined? Why do you think these inconsistencies were ignored at the time of the Crippen trial?…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Provocation was previously controlled under S2 of the homicide act 1957, the act stated where a person kills or is party to a killing of another, he shall not be convicted of murder if he was suffering from such abnormality of mind as substantially impaired his mental responsibility for his acts and omissions in doing or being a party to the killing. The new defence S54-56 Coroners and Justice Act 2009 replaced defence of Provocation S3 Homicide Act 1957; it came into force October 2010.…

    • 1882 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensics

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    7. What other inconsistencies were found in the case when the evidence was re-examined? Why do you think these inconsistencies were ignored at the time of the Crippen trial?…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1) In their Lordships' judgement the retailers are liable in contract of sale. The facts set out show negligence in manufacture. If excess sulphites were left in garment, that could only be because someone was at fault…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Provocation – a partial defence for murder, originating in the Medieval times, 400 years ago, acting as a concession for human frailty. Its primary source was to ensure that one guilty of killing ‘in the heat of passion’ would not face the, then mandatory death penalty. Indeed, it has become quite the mockery that in the modern, civilized society that Australia exists in today, that Queensland refuses to abolish the defence; no matter its incapability of reaching many agreed upon criterions of a ‘good’ law, including that of, it being relevant to society as its values and attitudes change, being equally available and applied to all, and it being certain and clear. The amendments of provocation may be a step in the right direction, but does…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeals Process

    • 699 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What is an appeal? An appeal is a “proceeding in which a case is brought before a higher court for a review of a lower court’s judgment” (pg. 465). This basically means a process which takes place because the defendant and their attorney feel that the verdict that was given was inaccurate which was due to something that may have happened during trial or the arrest. Appeals are done to make sure that the person has had a fair trial and none of their rights were violated. An appellate court as the text states can help an area decided on how to address certain issues. This is good because the appellate court judges can make a decision without having to worry about what society will think and if they will get reelected. An appellate court goes through cases and tries to understand what has taken place during the arrest and see if the law was upheld. An appeals process starts right after the trial, the defense must submit an appeal to the court. The person appealing should file all documents with the appellate court. The will then file briefs and the court will later hear each sides argument and decide/ once the decision is made the courts will announce their findings and why. An appellate court is based on the law not on any facts so a defense attorney cannot argue the facts presented during the case or that you were found guilty and you believe you are innocent. Your appeal should consist of the fairness for example if you had the right to a speedy trial or a defense attorney etc.…

    • 699 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Universität Hamburg Fakultät Wirtschafts-­‐ und Sozialwissenschaften M.A. European Studies Right to Same-­‐Sex Marriage Under Article 8 ECHR Melek Günay Hamburg, 2013 Table of Contents 1.Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 3 2.Definition of ‘sexual minorities’ ............................................................................................. 5 3.The right of same-­‐sex marriage and the ECHR .................................................................. 6 4.Case Studies ................................................................................................................................... 8 4.1. Rees v UK ..............................................................................................................................................…

    • 7354 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this appeal someone is actually asking their opponent to prove them wrong, so if they can’t they automatically are wrong. However, it is the job of the person actually purposing the argument to…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Defence of Provocation

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Provocation is a defence which reduces the offence of murder to manslaughter. Even though there may be an intent to kill it can be deemed that, in some circumstances, it is not appropriate to be classified as murder. It is not saying the killing is justified or excused. What it is saying is that the circumstances, the response (which resulted in the killing) is within the normal range of behaviour of what can be expected of the ordinary person and that it represents an acknowledgement of human frailty. This is the traditional view of the law.[1] When the penalty for murder was death, often provocation was a way of reducing the punishment from the death penalty to life imprisonment. In jurisdictions where there was a mandatory life sentence, there was also an argument for this defence to be in existence. [2] In this paper, the issues of the relevant stakeholders, previous provocation cases, and the law will be discussed in regards to any amendments or recommendations that need to be made in changing the current law in regards to the defence of provocation and how it will affect the Queensland society and its stakeholders.…

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Provocation Debate

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * Provocation- common law, criminal defence * Either or both statutory or common law * Possible defence by excuse or exculpation alleging a sudden or temporary loss of control- in response to another’s provocative conduct to justify an acquittal, mitigated sentence or conviction of lesser charge * Can be relevant in a court’s assessment of a defendant’s mens rea, intention or state of mind at the time of the incident * In some cases in UK, Canada and several Australian states, the defence of provocation is available only against a charge of murder- and can reduce to manslaughter * Known as ‘voluntary manslaughter’ * In USA the Model Penal Code substitutes the broader standard of extreme emotional or mental distress for the comparatively narrower standard of provocation * Under USA Sentencing Guidelines for federal courts- ‘if the victim’s wrongful conduct contributed significantly to provoking the offence behaviour, the court may reduce the sentence below the guideline range the reflect the nature and circumstances of the offenceHistory- * Developed in English courts in 16th – 17th century * At that time a conviction of murder carried a death sentence- thus a lesser offence was needed * At the time it was seen as socially required for a man to respond with controlled violence if ‘his honour or dignity was insulted or threatened’ * It was then considered to be understandable that the violence might be excessive and end in murder * In the 19th century the idea of acceptable violence when insulted began to weaken * The circumstanced were changed to- while such responses may not be ideal, they were a normal reaction resulting from loss of self- control- and thus deserved mitigating circumstances * By the end of the 20th century and beginning of the 21st century the defence of provocation and when it should be applied has caused much controversy * Many put it down to anachronism-…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays