When Scotty criticizes the Kirk’s choice to take nuclear warheads on to the Enterprise it creates a very tense moment between the two team members. Scotty criticizes Kirk’s decision vehemently and when Kirk is still insistent on direction to load he nuclear warheads on the Enterprise, Scotty aggressively but half-heartedly offers up his resignation. In a surprising instant, Captain Kirk accepts his resignation which shocks Scotty. Though the Captain values Scotty’s opinion and expertise, he needed to move the mission forward and that was one of the conditions for it to do so. The back and forth between them is curbed instantly with Kirks acceptance of Scotty’s resignation changing an ambiguous moment into absolution.…
It is far easier to accept data on the internet superficially than it is to be skeptical of information. Carr asserts that this ideology that information collection should be based on efficiency rather than skepticism may be detrimental in the future as artificial intelligence (AI) software develops. The brain will be seen by the public as a computer, much like that of an AI, that should transmit information hastily, rather than seen as a being that should ponder and question sources. He inquires on the safety of such an ideology and encourages readers to analyze that which they read and research. People are capable of deep thought and analysis, so accepting information superficially is dangerous.…
Descartes argues the mind is seperate from the physical body. With advances in nueroscience and the contious brain injuries gives strong evidence in supporting materialism. Defining what Cartesian dualists mean by the brain, mind, body and soul, an argument by Cartesians dualists may be reached. Responding to evidence confronting brain injuries from claims that the brain is only ‘an instrument of the soul’. Concluding there is a simultaneous support for materialism resulting from neuroscience and the Cartesian dualism argument, may be wrong.…
…as we come to rely on computers to mediate our understanding of the world, it is our own intelligence that flattens into artificial…
We all play various different roles throughout our journeys through life. Star Wars was written and produced by George Lucas. His original story was based on the writing of Joseph Campell who was a scholar of myths and legends. George Lucas also based his ideas off of Jung’s Archetype Theory. This theory is that our personalities fit into one of many different types, each based on a collective unconscious. His story follows a classic heroic arc. Star Wars was the first serious science fiction film created and also one six Oscars. In the movie Stars Wars by George Lucas’s characters relate to other books in terms of Jung’s theory, and relate to Jung collective unconscious, and have a familiar heroic arc.…
begin to think like computers."- Sydney J. Harris. Is it possible that one day everyone 's humanly…
To better understand how we relate ourselves to the technology we have nowadays and the technology that we have been exposed to in the past, we first analyze the book “Beyond Humanity” by Allen Buchanan. In this book, Buchanan explain enficices the idea that technological improvements are not new to us, he says “... to enhance human beings is to expand their capabilities- to enable them to do what normal human beings have hitherto not been able to do. Understood in this way, enhancement is ubiquitous in human history.” (Buchanan 38). These enhancements have always played a great role on our biological changes. For example, literature as one of these enhancements allowed us to communicate information more efficiently, it allowed us to store more information than our brains ever could; this came at a cost, because we are able to write down information or communicate it easier, our…
The paper discusses 2 contrasting leadership styles based on characters of Dr. Spock and Captain Kirk. Dr. Spock’s style is explained as rational, instrumental, transactional, managerial. Captain Kirk’s style is described as humanist, interpretive, transformational, leading, charismatic.…
I thought that Joseph Campbell was very thorough with his analogy, I especially liked how he said, computer chips are like religion, especially how all the little angels make the parts work in the computer chip itself. Likewise, we humans can liken ourselves to computers, in society most of everyone is following a system that leads to the end result, that is what appears on the computer screen itself; however, not all parts know what the other is doing; however, every working part leads to the same result with is a functioning…
The protagonist conceives his world in terms of dualities (inside/outside, black/white, human/monster), the fact that he avoids the temptation of the female vampires standing outside the house during night, is a way to understand the implicit racism of the novel. By avoiding the potential sexual encounter, he avoids the breaking between the boundaries of the dualities previously mentioned, thus preventing the mixture of blood, not only because of the bacteria, but also avoiding the mixture between races and keeping his body uncontaminated and pure. The lust he feels towards the female vampires, if we take into account the metaphor of the differentiation between white and black people, the sexual exploitation of black women carried out by white…
AI is commonly attributed to movies such as Terminator or Space Oddity. As a result, when the future of AI is ever debated,…
The environment in the book and the environment the world today are very different. In The Machine Stops, the world is taken over by technology. The technology that they are under is called The Machine. The Machine is a machine that does everything for everybody. The environment is very isolated, and everyone lives underground in their own little tunnel. It feeds them, baths them, provides a bed for them, and even communicates for them. Life was just handed to you by a push of button, literally. The daily routine someone under the machine goes something like this, wake up, press a button to get breakfast, watch a lecture on a screen, press a button for lunch, watch another lecture on a screen, press a button for supper, and then press a button to go to bed. On the other hand, the world today is very free spirited. If someone wants to…
When the parents of Harrison were watching the death of their son on television, I do not believe that they could actually “feel” what was happening or could completely process anything for a long period of time. Hazel said that she remembered “‘Something real sad on television...It’s all kind of mixed up in my mind’”(Source A). You can tell that Hazel saw the murder happen, but she couldn’t feel or remember the incident. George couldn’t remember it either because of his mental handicap making a sharp noise in his head (Source A). This shows that this technology has a greatly effective drawback because they were not able to feel and show emotion like diverse people can; it seems like anyone is just any other person due to an equal world. This pretty much takes away the purpose of life: to love and care for one another. That is how the author uses technology and television to relate to the author’s…
The view that I have selected and decided to analysed, explained and defend is the materialist theory. The main reason for my choice of this view over the idealist one is that, in my opinion, empiricism shows us humans and provide hard evidence which I will detailed in this opinion piece that matter does exists and we are surrounded by it on a day to day basis. The great Philosopher John Locke express his opinion which I clearly agree with that our minds have no ideas and concepts when we are born, as such we develop and gain knowledge over time from experiences. Without experiencing sensation or reflection we generally would not be able to differentiate the differences between physical properties such as shapes, size, texture or colour. For…
In the article “Can Computers Think,” John Searle makes the claim that computers, while they can simulate understanding or emotions, cannot think in the same way that a human mind can. John Searle objects to what he calls “strong AI,” the claim that the brain is just one type of hardware that can “run” the program that is essentially the human mind, and thus that if computers cannot currently think, they will one day be able to. Searle supports his claim on the basis that while computers run entirely syntactically, viewing information as abstract symbols with no meaning and reacting to them based off of their shape, the human mind has the additional layer of semantics that can not be obtained from syntax alone. Thus, John Searle proves that no matter how advanced technology becomes, a computer will never think in the same way that a human can.…