Preview

Maurice Schweitzer's 'The Psychology Of Forgiveness'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
557 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Maurice Schweitzer's 'The Psychology Of Forgiveness'
In the article "The Psychology of Forgiveness", Maurice Schweitzer studies the psychology behind forgiveness and trust. Maurice and his colleagues, Michael Haselhuhn and Alison Wood, conducted an experiment to see if basic beliefs about moral "character" influence trust violations and forgiveness. These scientists also wanted to see if they could manipulate ones beliefs to either make them more or less forgiving. In their experiment they recruited a large amount of volunteers to participate in an experiment where they are giving six dollars and they have the option to give away their six dollars to double the value and the doubled value can be split and both people make profit but each person is prepped differently. The independent variable in this case would be way the volunteers were prepped and the dependent variable would be whether they reestablished …show more content…
First, the researchers only tested their experiment on a unknown amount of people which does not provide enough evidence to prove their thesis. Maurice only tested his experiment on a "large group" of volunteers which does not describe how many people were in the study. The experiment also lacks data so there is no evidence that will prove their claims are true. Without any data one has to just believe what they say is true. The fact that the participants were volunteers also skews the validity of the study because the people are willing to be a part of the experiment and knew what they were getting in to. Another aspect of her research that leads to it being invalid is that it is a correlation study. One can infer that changing the way the participants were prepped had influence on whether they would be forgiving or not forgiving but one cannot conclude that it is the cause of their greater performance. That point is stated in a famous psychology line which is correlation does not imply

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Stanley Milgram’s “The Perils of Obedience,” Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that would involve an experimenter, a teacher, and a learner to determine how far obedience would play a role on willing participants. The purpose of Milgram’s experiment is to see how far a willing participant would go based on orders to continue knowing that the orders would result in another person’s pain. The experiment was set up so that two willing participants went into the experiment understanding that they were taking part in a memory and learning exercise. One of the two willing participants played the role as the…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Milgram's Study

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Psychologists such as Orne & Holland (1968) claim that participants in psychological studies have learned to mistrust researchers as they believe the true aims of the study may be hidden. In Milgrams research this means that participants may not truly have believed they were giving the learner electric shocks, and that this is the real reason for the high percentage. However, Milgram challenged this by interviewing…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgrams experiments are some of the most recognized behavior experiments in psychology today. Milgrams most known experiment was ‘shocking’ to people and has also been controversial ethically. As Ian Parker stated it would “make his name and destroy his reputation.” Parkers Obedience essay talks much of Milgrams life before the experiment and how the psychology community thought about his ethics.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Respondents were being informed that the experiment would analyze how being punished could have an effect on learning aptitude. Three individuals would be involved in the experiment, one person who would be the “experimenter”, one person who would be the “teacher” and one person who would be the “learner.” The experimenter was in charge of the entire experiment, giving orders to the teacher when they were hesitant to perform their duties, and would continuously remind the teacher that they must continue the trial, even when they began to feel uncomfortable with their part in the experiment. The role of experimenter would be filled by someone who was completely aware of the experiment, and would try their best to keep the experiment going for as long as they could. The teacher was meant to listen and obey the rules of the experimenter and deliver unpleasant stimuli to the learner when ordered to by the experimenter. The learner was supposed to memorize word pairings and then answer questions about these word pairings to the best of…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Forgiveness In Unbroken

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Louie Zamperini once said “I was raised to face any challenge.” In the novel Unbroken, written by Laura Hillenbrand, Louie Zamperini, an ambitious WWII veteran, survives the hardships of life through perseverance and forgiveness. He struggled through multiple POW camps and an extreme captor, the Bird, but still managed to become the resilient person that made the impossible, possible. He had no regrets in his life because of the thorough decisions he made. By explaining how Louie’s resilient mindset gets him through the war, Hillenbrand shows how he is able to forgive and forget.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Frank Schmalleger, “some theories of human behavior help us understand why certain people engage in acts that society defines as criminal or deviant, while others do not” (78). Once a theory is implemented it must be tested, with some of these trial an error tests come results thus either proving the theory or discrediting it due to the results.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did you know that in this story Earth is no longer inhabitable? The Other Foot by Ray Bradbury is an imaginative story that teaches you to be forgiving. The people of Mars are angry at the people of earth because they treated them badly for so many years. Now the lives of the people of Earth are in the people of Mars's hands. This story teaches you to forgive no matter what.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Milgram's experiment, if he would have informed his participants that they were being tested on how far they would go when they were ordered to do so, even if it was against their conscience, the participants would never have gone as far as they did and the research would have been fundamentally flawed. There is no accurate way to test human nature if the participants change their behavior based on what is expected of them. "The tendency of people to portray themselves in a more favorable light than their thoughts or actions, is called socially desirable responding (Lalwani)." Socially desirable responding is one of the problems with the use of surveys, and the problem carries over to behavioral studies. If the "teachers" from Milgram's experiment had been told the real purpose of the study, they most likely would have applied far less shock, if they shocked at all because that is what is socially acceptable. No one really knows how far they will go under order until they are faced with…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is much controversy surrounding the use of deception in research studies because it is an act in which researchers intentionally omit information from participants. However, there are several pros to this approach, one of them being that deception eliminates the possibility of participants altering their behavior and their responses based on the knowledge provided about the study to them. Another reason is that the study will in turn conclude to be more conscientious and reliable, thus maintaining its validity.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Despite the results, the experiment was in violation of three ethical principles of Psychology research. The first, Principle A: Beneficence and Nonmaleficence. The principle…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Restorative Justice is the concept that is described as focusing on the needs of the victims, offenders, and community to obtain restitution and restore workable relations. We were able to see restorative justice in action through the film “As We Forgive”. Prior to the watching the film, I had an understand of what this term meant. The offender has to take the responsibility of asking for forgiveness from those he has hurt. The victim then must being willing to allow the offender the opportunity to ask and act on their forgiveness. The film focused on then a woman that survived the Rwanda Genocide who lost 29 out of 31 people in her family. The death she was most affected by was that of her father, he was killed by one…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research into conformity

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Over the 12 critical trials about 75% of participants conformed at least once and 25% of participant never conformed. On average, about one third (32%) of the participants who were placed in this situation went along and conformed to the clearly incorrect majority on the critical trials. When they were interviewed after the experiment, most of them said that they did not really believe their conforming answers, but had gone along with the group for fear of being ridiculed.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Asch’s study aimed to investigate whether being alone or in a group, influenced conformity. The participants were told that this was a study on visual perception, and they all signed a consent form. They were asked to identify the longest line out of a set of four first alone and then with a group of 7 confederates. In 12 out of the 18 trials with the group, the confederates purposely gave the wrong answer, and the results showed that 75% of all participants conformed at least once during these 12 trials where the wrong answer was given. In this study, a consent form was signed and the participants were informed about the procedure of the study, but they were deceived about the true aim of the study by telling them it was a visual perception study when it truly was about conformity.…

    • 949 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Participants were asked to take part in a study that consisted of repetitive tasks that included putting spools onto a tray and then emptying the tray repeatedly. Participants were then asked to lie about their experience to other ‘participants’ (confederates), to convince them that the experiment was interesting. Festinger et al predicted that behaving in a way that did not match their attitudes (lying) would put participants in a state of cognitive dissonance. They predicted that participants would then, change their attitudes towards the experiment and convince themselves that the experiment was interesting after all, in order to reduce this dissonance. Participants, depending on their condition were offered incentives of either $1, $20, or no reward at all. They found surprisingly, that participants rewarded with $1 reported enjoying the experiment more than those in other conditions. Festinger et al explain this, arguing that those rewarded with $20 would report less enjoyment as they may have felt that their behaviour could be explained by the fact that they were offered an attractive reward for lying, therefore eliminating the need for an attitude change. Participants who were offered little reward ($1) may have found that the reward was not significant enough to justify the lie, so they reduced dissonance by changing their…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obedience

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Migram (1963) conducted a study on how obedient a person would be to an authority figure and establish a baseline measure of how obedient they would be when ordered to inflict pain to another human via electric shocks. The way he conducted this was by doing a lab experiment, he advertised for forty volunteers being paid £2 to come for a test which was to test on memory and review the affects. The experiment was to be done at Yale University (A highly respected place of study) this location was picked to make the experiment more real. So one by one they were brought into the waiting room where another member of the public was already waiting. The two members of the public were told there was two roles one to be the participant (teacher) and the other the confederate (learner). They were informed that the learner would be receiving electric shocks from the teacher for every question they got wrong. The voltage of shock would go up each time they had a question wrong starting at 15 volts and going 15 each time all the way up to 450 volts. They were told they would draw lots on which they would be, however this test was rigged with the other person already in the room being an actor. So when the paper was drawn both answers said teacher, with the actor always being the learner. The participant was then shown the learner being strapped to the machine which was based in another room to the where they would be set up. The results of this experiment were surprising as most expected people to stop at the first sign of the learner requesting the test be stopped…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays