Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Maxism in Literature

Satisfactory Essays
1019 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Maxism in Literature
What is Marxism? Write a note on the influence of Marxism on literature.

Marxism is a sociological approach to literature that viewed works of literature or art as the products of historical forces that can be analyzed by looking at the material conditions in which they were formed. Marxism generally focuses on the clash between the dominant and repressed classes in any given age and also may encourage art to imitate what is often termed an "objective" reality. Contemporary Marxism is much broader in its focus, and views art as simultaneously reflective and autonomous to the age in which it was produced. Marxist literary theories tend to focus on the representation of class conflict as well as the reinforcement of class distinctions through the medium of literature. Marxist theorists use traditional techniques of literary analysis but subordinate aesthetic concerns to the final social and political meanings of literature. Marxist theorist often champion authors sympathetic to the working classes and authors whose work challenges economic equalities found in capitalist societies. Main key features of Marxism are commodificaion, conspicuous consumption, dialectical materialism, material circumstances, reflectionism, superstructure etc. Major figures include Karl Marx, Terry Eagleton, Fredric Jameson, Raymond Williams, Louis Althusser, Walter Benjamin, Antonio Gramsci, Georg Lukacs, Friedrich Engels, Theordor Adorno, Edward Ahern, Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari.

Like Freudian theory, Marxist theory's influence on Modern art and literature can be first broken down by its influence of writers, and the works they produced, and on readers, and the way critics use Marxist theory to interpret the works.

Influence On Writers:

Under the influence of Marxist theory, an author is interested in examining:

a) History as Historical Materialism: The author hopes to show how all human relations are at root a class struggle between oppressor and oppressed, and/or a struggle for control of the means of production. These include "human relations" writ both large and small: both on a global and political level (like war, the fall of Rome, the spread of Christianity etc) or on a personal level (how two characters or a family relates to one another). Example: Heart Of Darkness, Things Fall Apart.

b)Writing As A Means of Controlling Ideology: Marxist theory suggests that if hegemony is maintained through ideology, the oppressed must gain control of their own ideology. This is explicitly the argument presented by Virginia Woolf in A Room Of One's Own; women will break the cycle of oppression by writing their own stories and defining themselves as human, intelligent, equal etc. This theory also inspired writers of color both in the US and throughout the world, to tell their own stories and redefine the cultural image of the Black man, the Latino, the African etc.

Influence On Readers:

Under the influence of Marxist theory, a reader or critic is probably interested in examining:

a) The Work As Ideology: Simply put, Marxism argues that any work of art functions either consciously or unconsciously as ideology; it does not define some eternal representation of "Truth" so much as it represents the ideologies that serve to oppress or an attempt to rebel against that oppression. When combined with a dose of Nietzsche, this way of thinking about art will have a profound effect on so called "Post Modern" critical theories.
For example, under this model, a Marxist reading of Wordsworth's Romanticism as an means through which the urban, middle to upper class English elite attempted to maintain hegemony over the rural, agricultural peasant class; that is, "pastoralism" really masks nothing more than the modern aristocracy keeping control over the peasant class, as it had always done.

b) As A Record Of Historical Relations: A Marxist influenced reading of, say a Jane Austen novel would be interested in the role of women as the oppressed and the negotiation of romantic relations and marriage as deeply, if not entirely, influenced by a struggle for domination or freedom. A Feminist Marxist reading of Austen would see the novel's women as the oppressed.

Karl Marx was a proponent of the classless society. He attacked the elites (bourgeoisie) and theorised a political and economic system that would eliminate the heirarchical structure in society. It would bring equality, brotherhood and liberty to societies. He wrote the communist manifesto, which was sort of like a handbook for communistic leaders. It influenced modernism because without it, communism would not have been nearly as strong. This view has profound implications in aesthetics, especially in literature. Up until Marx the novel could well be seen as an elitist product, dealing with a certain kind of protagonist and a certain kind of language, voice and perspective. We start to see literature appearing that gives voice to characters and experiences from society at large. Society is attacked, man is attacked! All because suddenly, people are starting to ask the question....why THIS kind of society? Why THIS kind of man?

Marx' ideas inspire a generation of avant-gardists, modernists and bohemians to defy artistic conventions...to write their self, to write experience....to concieve of writing in wholly new ways. Two of the most telling examples of Marx' influence on modernism in literature are to be found in Virginia Woolf and James Joyce. Their works convey an experience of the self and of society in a way that jepordizes conventional power structures, they give voice to the marginalised.....a voice of comparible quality and clarity as the elites. In certain modernist texts we see the erasure of monumental history and of class boundaries through the representation of common human experience. This is a telling contribution of Marx' philosophy.

In keeping with the totalizing spirit of Marxism, literary theories arising from the Marxist paradigm have not only sought new ways of understanding the relationship between economic production and literature, but all cultural production as well. Marxist analyses of society and history have had a profound effect on literary theory and practical criticism, most notably in the development of “New Historicism” and “Cultural Materialism.”

Edited & Re-synchronized By: Mohammad Mehedee Hasan
Roll No - 0510022 (2005-06)
Department of English, IU, Kushtia http://facebook.com/mehedee2084 mehedee2084@gmail.com, mehedee2084@yahoo.co

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The marxist lens focuses on socioeconomic influence and historical information from the time period. Character design is a large part of any form of creative media, including literature. The Grapes of Wrath…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Marxist literary criticism according to the Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary theory describes that a novel should unmask or accentuate a more whole understanding of a community. Marxist criticism analyzes ways in which a human is formed and socialized through manufactured views of reality and truth. (Fish, Tom) The novel A Prayer for Owen Meany is a good example of underlying patterns and manufactured views of reality and truth. If we examine John Irving’s novel A Prayer for Owen Meany through a Marxist lens we can see that Harriet looks at the people around her according to class power and social standing.…

    • 2654 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Always Running

    • 462 Words
    • 1 Page

    reveals oppression to be a primary theme of the text, which is shown through the writer’s use of…

    • 462 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Marxist lens is used to examine how socioeconomic factors influence the plot, setting, reader, author, and time period of a certain subject. The Marxist lens is based on socialist and dialectic theories. Marxists believe that literature itself is social institution and has a specific ideological function. Marx said that human history can be studied best by observing how the lower class interacts with the higher class. One of the most obvious observations that can be made through the Marxist lens about Frankenstein is the motivation behind the creation of the…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism focuses on the inequality that exists in capitalist society and suggests ways that this inequality can be overcome (i.e. through evolution). It also suggests alternatives to the capitalist system.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    involves analyzing the social structure, such as race, class and culture, and the distribution of…

    • 2664 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociology 24 marks

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Marxists theory is a conflict theory; they believe that we live in a capitalist society and that the family is all about serving the interests of capitalism.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marxism is a theory which sees all society’s institutions as helping to maintain class inequality and capitalism…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marxism is a worldview and method of societal analysis that focuses on class relations and societal conflict. Marxist sociologists believe that economics are what determines society. These include things like: politics, religion, law and culture. Basically they think that the way goods are made and distributed determines the ways…

    • 601 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of Mice and Men

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When looking at literature through the lens of Marxist Theory, it is not just art to be passively appreciated; it is a product of the socioeconomic and ideological conditions of the time, even if the author did not intend for it to be.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism shares in common with functionalism the macro structural approach to society, looking at it as a whole, however a key difference between the two theories is that marxism is a conflict perspective, that is the conflict of class between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat also known as the ruling and working classes. The work of Karl Marx in the mid 1800s constitutes the main body of this conflict theory, he wrote that the central institution of capitalist society is private property, the system by which capital (money, machines, factories and other material objects) is controlled by a small minority of the population, leading to opposed classes i.e. the bourgeoisie and the proletariat (Cohen 1978). Marxists believe that society is based on ascribed status which is given by birth or family background, therefore the bourgeoisie pass down their land and properties to their children, keeping the wealth in the…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx and Abortion

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Marxist believes that personality and human value are imparted by the external and economic environment, not by any inherent spiritual value, or even by biological processes.…

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism is an ideology based on the economic and political theories of Karl Marx and Freidrich Engels. Karl Marx who was born in Germany in 1818 was a revolutionary whose ideas on society were the foundation of communism. Under modern capitalism the means of production, such as factories, land, and technology are controlled by a small minority who Marx called the bourgeoisie. Production is carried out by the working class, known as the proletarians who have to sell their labour or face poverty or starvation. Taken together these two classes form the economic base of society, what Marx called the substructure. Marx saw that there was conflict between these two divisions and that this could only be resolved by a revolution, which would lead to a classless society, where the means of production would be held collectively. All Marx’s theories use social class as a starting point for analysis. In this essay we will explore two areas where Marx’s theories have had influence, crime and deviance and education. Marx saw the bourgeoisie as controlling these institutions. Marxists believe that these institutions form part of the superstructure of society with the economy as its base.…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism and Education

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first thing I will write about are the strengths. The strengths about the Marxist view are it points out how ideology is transmitted within school via the hidden curriculum, how education legitimises class inequality, it points out the inequalities of both opportunity and outcome on the system and it exposes the myth of meritocracy. From these points I can tell that it tries to believe that teachers are a kind of agent who are trying to wrong the children. Louis Althusser believed that education is an ideological apparatus designed to control children by brainwashing them. Applying this idea allows the hidden curriculum to transmit values which are not intentionally designed to happen. With class inequality it shows that schools are planting a job title on children which will link to their background. For example, a kid from the working class may get a job working at a car manufactures, while a kid from upper class may get a job as a lawyer. But, this really exposes the idea of meritocracy where if you do well at school you will get a good job as a reward.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sociological Perspectives

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Marxism views the appearance of consensus as nothing more than an imitation. It has the purpose of concealing the reality of the capitalist class and determining the shape of the superstructure by imposing its will upon the working class. It exploits this part of society for profit, supporting the belief that the law is selective in its deliverance of punishment.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays