Mcbeth Critical Analysis
Macbeth Critical Analysis Essay
The soul of Mankind is a complicated blend of both good and evil. Evil cannot exist without good, and at the same time good also rely on evil to contrast its virtuous nature. Our contradictious character establishes our existence as humans. “Macbeth” is a well-known tragedy by Shakespeare in his later stage of life. By then, Shakespeare had grown from a man filled with romantic and fabulous emotions to a much more experienced and wise person. His play “Macbeth” is less of an entertainment and more a tool to portray an intricate and bleak concept; the nature of good and evil. Evil works through Macbeth’s impulsive actions and led him into a downward spiral. He became a battlefield; his own guilty conscience against his innermost devious thoughts. Furthermore “Macbeth” demonstrates that evil may be able to penetrate the mind rapidly and furiously, enabling a person to desert their righteous morals, but the power of good, which comes in a mellower and more consistent form will always be the more dominate part of human nature.
Macbeth is a man of action; he often lets his impulsive thoughts take control of his actions, enabling evil to find an opening in his mind to seep in. In the beginning of the play, Macbeth receives a prophecy from the Weird Sisters that he would become King of Scotland. Compared to the skeptical reaction of Banquo, who questioned the creditability of the witches, Macbeth’s reaction was rather contented. His mind immediately thought of different ways of achieving the prophecy. “My thoughts, whose murder yet is but fantastical, Shakes so my single state of man” (I, iii, 151-152) Shakespeare used the word “murder” for Macbeth to describe his own thoughts, this means that Macbeth, by this point already has some implication on how the prophecy would come true, in this case, something that would take the form of bloodshed; something evil. Maybe the thought came too fast, Macbeth was not able to grasp the full
The soul of Mankind is a complicated blend of both good and evil. Evil cannot exist without good, and at the same time good also rely on evil to contrast its virtuous nature. Our contradictious character establishes our existence as humans. “Macbeth” is a well-known tragedy by Shakespeare in his later stage of life. By then, Shakespeare had grown from a man filled with romantic and fabulous emotions to a much more experienced and wise person. His play “Macbeth” is less of an entertainment and more a tool to portray an intricate and bleak concept; the nature of good and evil. Evil works through Macbeth’s impulsive actions and led him into a downward spiral. He became a battlefield; his own guilty conscience against his innermost devious thoughts. Furthermore “Macbeth” demonstrates that evil may be able to penetrate the mind rapidly and furiously, enabling a person to desert their righteous morals, but the power of good, which comes in a mellower and more consistent form will always be the more dominate part of human nature.
Macbeth is a man of action; he often lets his impulsive thoughts take control of his actions, enabling evil to find an opening in his mind to seep in. In the beginning of the play, Macbeth receives a prophecy from the Weird Sisters that he would become King of Scotland. Compared to the skeptical reaction of Banquo, who questioned the creditability of the witches, Macbeth’s reaction was rather contented. His mind immediately thought of different ways of achieving the prophecy. “My thoughts, whose murder yet is but fantastical, Shakes so my single state of man” (I, iii, 151-152) Shakespeare used the word “murder” for Macbeth to describe his own thoughts, this means that Macbeth, by this point already has some implication on how the prophecy would come true, in this case, something that would take the form of bloodshed; something evil. Maybe the thought came too fast, Macbeth was not able to grasp the full