Preview

mcgaugh t swa7

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
305 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
mcgaugh t swa7
Tucker McGaugh
Tina Schneekloth
English 1301 02
5 October 2014
SWA 7

Should the government take control of our rights? Roger McGrath use many past events to portray the events that could happen if the government was to take control of our rights. He gives evidence of how the English treated the Scotts and Irish to show that the second amendment shouldn’t be infringed. His main point is that it is God’s given natural right to have freedom. In “A God-Given Natural Right”, McGrath effectively uses picturesque words to express his reason why we should have the right to bear arms. McGrath uses picturesque words throughout the article to help convince the reader that everybody should have the right to bear arms. McGrath writes, “Death and destruction commonly followed disarmament”(McGrath 381), this creates a vivid picture in the readers mind. This shows that taking away weapons from people, almost always leads to something bad. It relates to the reader because it makes them think of a time when they had something taken away from them and all they wanted to do was cause destruction until they got it back. He also uses picturesque language later on when he writes, “Can you imagine the National Rifle Association telling the New York Times that it has freedom of the press but it may not have printing presses…” (McGrath 382). This quote was definitely meant to be pictured in the readers mind. McGrath gives an example for the reader to picture in their mind so that the can compare it to the government taking guns away from people. The right to bear arms has been a very controversial topic for a long time. McGrath is able to convey his side of the argument through his picturesque words. This ultimately helps the reader to comprehend his way of thinking much better.
Word Count: 297

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The civil libertarian writer, Molly Ivins, in her Op-Ed argument, “Taking A Stab At Our Infatuation With Guns” published in 1993 addresses the topic of making United states a gun free country in accordance of the United States Second Amendment to prevent any more unnecessary harm to the Millennium class. Ivins supports her claim by using a homespun diction, analogy imagery, colloquial style and loose, cumulative sentence syntax to create a restatement effect. Examples from the text include a goodwill attitude toward the subject. By setting herself as a civil libertarian it gives the audience a sense of commonly known ground. Ivins tries to make herself seem equal to her audience by also using homespun language to make her audience relate to…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    S. V Cruikshank Case

    • 3244 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights was an elaborate document for its time. This document was the beginning of a revolutionary country, one that was formed from brave men and women who gave their lives so that we the people of the United States may live in a free nation today. The framers of the United States Constitution were all very intelligent men and knew what it would take to create and keep a strong free society. That is why the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution gives the people of the United States the right to bear arms. In this paper I am going to discuss and validate the American people’s right to maintain firearms for their own personal protection.…

    • 3244 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Justin Cronin the writer of “Confessions of a Liberal Gun Owner” states that you should be able to own guns. You should be able to exercise your rights and express your beliefs on gun ownership. All should be done with the right precautions and safety. The effectiveness of this essay makes it a convincing, because he states his arguments and he also states possible counter arguments.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Well Regulated Militiaa

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A well-regulated militia is an essay by Paul Fussell. Paul Fussell is a well-established English professor and in his essay he shares his thoughts on the gun-law in America and the NRA’s way of misquoting. Paul Fussell is very eloquent in his words & he chooses his words with care. The way he appeals to the subject & the way he criticizes are so well formulated, however I will be focusing on the National Rifle Association.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2nd Amendment Rights APA

    • 3553 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This paper will provide the public with information concerning the views of anti-gun control activists and pro-gun control activists. In order to accomplish this task, this paper will answer the following questions:…

    • 3553 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, Warren E. Burger makes a convincing argument towards gun control for the second amendment strongly relying on history and current day violence statistics. He argues the right to bear arms is no longer a tool of survival for Americans, and the base to which we got this right was formed on state militias. While it is the right of americans to protect their homes and hunt, they can do so through more regulated laws in order to instill the "domestic tranquility" promised in the…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right of individuals to keep and bear arms . Although the Supreme Court has ruled that this right applies to individuals, not merely to collective militias, it has also held that the government may regulate or place some limits on the manufacturer, ownership and sale of firearms. Requested by several states during the Constitutional ratification debates, the widespread desire for such an amendment reflected the lingering resentment over the widespread efforts of the British to confiscate the colonists’ firearms at the outbreak of the Revolutionary War. Patrick Henry had rhetorically asked, shall we be stronger, "when we are totally disarmed, and when a British Guard shall be…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    2nd Amendment.

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The issues surrounding this argument for more than a century is to whether the framers of the 2nd amendment intended for the people to have the” individual right to keep and bear arms” to avoid falling under rule of a tyrannical government, or did they intend those rights to be governed by the states and ultimately controlled by government. U.S. Const. Amend. II…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes the solution to a problem is far out of reach and attempting to change what is not looking for change is not the answer. Over the years, controversy developed that contemplates upon the interpretation of the amendment and whether or not it should be abolished and has formed two sides of support: those for the Second Amendment and those against it. Those against the…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2nd Amendment Arguments

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It is easy to understand that the leaders of the American Revolution held a different interpretation of the 2nd Amendment. At that time, Americans were fighting for independence from Great Britain. However, regardless of the view of the militia’s weak performance during the Revolutionary War, Americans still trusted that without a “well-regulated militia” the republican government would fail. For example, the battle of Yorktown was a major turning point of the war that was led by Washington’s militia and without that victory the war would’ve continued. Also, this lesson continues to echo throughout history, when citizens organize into local militias they will be able to stop a tyrannical government from developing and defeat foreign invaders from taking their land. Additionally, a well-regulated militia can help deter civil disorders. Again, which history has also shown that republican governments with armed citizens are profoundly vulnerable to internal uproar. For instance, in Massachusetts, Daniel Shay’s Rebellion displays the threat that can occur when private citizens feel they have the right to own firearms. When a group begins to feel disenfranchised they will exercise the right to bear arms in an illegal fashion, which can cause the republic to…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Pros And Cons

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the wake of multiple shootings such as the theatre shooting in Aurora, Colorado, should U.S. gun control laws be reformed, or would that result in the violation of constitutional rights? From the day the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was adopted on December 15, 1791, giving U.S. citizens the right to carry firearms, the issue of gun control has been the subject of many debates. And the effects of more strictly regulated Gun control would be detrimental to our society. Gun control is unreasonable for the following reasons: 1) the right to own and carry weapons is granted by the Constitution and upheld by the Supreme Court, 2) the majority of U.S. gun owners…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Campus Carry Laws Essay

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the United States of America, most Americans would argue that the Second Amendment is one of the most important rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights until gun violence intentionally or unintentionally impacts their household. Unfortunately, most Americans have limited knowledge regarding the foundation of the Second Amendment and the guaranteed right to bear arms; therefore, every incident that Americans encounter is fair game. The premise is quite simple, “to protect citizens from the government” in the event the government attempt to “exert power beyond the powers enumerated in the Constitution” resulting in an infringement on the civil rights of its citizens. Nevertheless, the true meaning behind this indelible right no longer exists…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These three essays on the topic of gun control, “Both Sides Have Something to Fear” by David Ropeik, “We Can Ratchet Down the Passions” by Adam Winkler, and “A Divide Widened by Misunderstanding” by David Kopel, have many similarities in their views and opinions of the gun debate; i.e. to have gun rights or gun control. Not only their viewpoints, or lack thereof rather, but their timing from when these essays were written and their use of emotional ethos to grab the audience’s attention are all very similar. There also are a lot of differences between these three essays, such as who is in charge of the debate, and what caused the debate in the first place.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stricter Gun Control

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Schumer and Presser go on to say that when the short burst of public outcry is over, attention fades from the issue of gun control until the next mass shooting occurs. Schumer and Presser, like Kleck, attribute this loss of attention to the fact that the proponents of gun rights are often more passionate about protecting their rights than proponents of gun control are passionate about regulating guns (2013, 2). Additionally, Robert Wolpert and James Gimpel argue that gun owners are concerned with protecting their self-interest, which is why gun owners are often opposed to stricter gun control regulations (1998, 241). With this understanding, one can see the perspective of those that oppose stricter gun control regulations. With understanding of the opposing side’s perspective, one can be more prepared to refute the opposing argument. For this reason, the articles written by Schumer and Presser and Wolpert and Gimpel are extremely beneficial when preparing to refute the other side’s…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Essay

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The issue of gun control continues to remain a controversy. A large number of citizens believe that if gun acts are strictly enforced, that violence and the threat of crime will reduce within neighborhoods. On the other hand, a large amount of society feels that they deserve to bear arms, whether used for hunting, or as self-defense tools. If guns become strictly enforced than those whom like hunting are penalized for wanting to take part in a sport. Everyone should have the freedom to legally purchase and own a gun. Enforcing a nationwide gun policy violates the second amendment rights and will cause problems within the government.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays