2) Frank A. Tassone; the former business manager, Pamela Gluckin; and an accounting clerk, Debra Rigano, who is a niece of Ms. Gluckin embezzled money in a scheme in which Dr. Tassone and Ms. Gluckin and nine of their family members and friends charged $5.9 million for personal items and cash advances on 74 personal credit cards. Then Ms. Gluckin and Dr. Tassone used district checks to pay those bills. The audit found that Dr. Tassone and Ms. Gluckin would obtain cash advances on their credit cards at A.T.M. 's. Ms. Gluckin, whose salary and benefits in her final year were $87,250, charged $559,176 in cash advances to the district over six years. Dr. Tassone, who received a salary of $230,000, charged $541,596 to the district in cash advances. Once the cash advances and the credit card charges - among them, for Tiffany and Tourneau jewelry, Coach leather accessories, carpet and furniture for him; and clothes from Nordstrom and Sears, electronic equipment, pet supplies and art and furniture for her - were executed, those amounts were submitted to the district, the audit said. To pay those bills, district checks were sent directly to the card issuers. The audit found that the district 's financial software could be easily manipulated and had fraud controls that had never been activated. Using a legitimate vendor account number, the name of the check 's recipient would be changed from a vendor of school supplies to the creditors. After the check was issued, the name of the payee would be changed back in the computer records to the legitimate vendor to conceal the fraudulent payment, according to the audit.…
This case is about the $4 million embezzlement fraud by an employee of a magazine publisher, and how the fraud was discovered. The type of fraud discovered was a billing scheme that was found on accident. A billing scheme is, “Any scheme in which a person causes his employer to issue a payment by submitting invoices for fictitious goods or services, inflated invoices or invoices for personal purchases.” 1 In this case, it just so happened that the new chief internal auditor decided to stop by the accounts payable department to collect a series of recently submitted invoices so that he could meet with the vice president to understand how the accounting codes work. In doing so, they found that a number of invoices had been forged. According to the 2010 Global Fraud Studies, “11% of the time, victim organizations either had to stumble onto the fraud or be notified of it by a third party in order to detect it.” 2 With coincidence one, the investigation revealed that the forgeries were coming from the painting operations in its facilities department, in which was overseen by Albert Miano. Miano started his scheme by creating false invoices for the jobs done by painters. He would not reinvoice exactly the same work done during a week, but he would make it look similar to where no one would ever become suspicious. The opportunity for Miano to commit fraud came into play when he was allowed to go and collect the approved invoices and insert his own replicated fraudulent invoices as approved. He also was the one who transported the invoices and collected…
In essence, the savvy business leader went from rags to riches (Sorkin, 2002). Unfortunately he would pay the cost for his naïveté when he was indicted of “twenty-two counts of larceny conspiracy and securities fraud” which came at time when many white collar crimes were under high scrutiny. Amid that time even Martha Stewart was indicted and sentenced to jail for her white collar crimes (“Tyco CEO Dennis…,” 2011) which make's people wonder if " that’s a good thing " considering that these practices were basic practices in business, and just a few people were sentenced (“Tyco CEO Dennis…”,…
As the case of Excello Telecommunications is reviewed it can be seen that the CFO was facing financial difficulties due to increased competition. In 2010 the earnings estimate was not going to be met and this would have affected the bonuses, stock options, and the share prices of the Excello stocks. After discovering a large sale that was pending until the shipment could be made for the following year the CFO asked the company controller to find a way to capitalize on the sale in the current year so that the budget shortfall could be met. The only way to accomplish the task was to work around the rules of accounting. The intent to find a way around the rules presents possible legal issues. This case can be evaluated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the AICPA and we look at the financial reporting standards and ethics involved.…
Did not reveal the accounting glitch to his superiors and took advantage of the system deficiency…
1. Sharron Watkins ignored the first signs of fraud in a selfish pursuit to develop her own career. When first warning signs of fraud happened in 1996 Watkins protested against them to higher management however got no response. Instead of alerting the public or taking legal actions she simply accepted defeat and switched divisions in the company, ultimately allowing her to become Vice President. Had Watkins taken action early on the scandal would have not been able to develop in to what it had by 2000.…
It was the president, who was the one who initially decided not to post the losses, but told his CFO and controller to hide the company’s losses in a separate subledger while continuing to tell the CEO and board members that the company was in good financial standing. The president felt significant pressure as the business model was his, and the simple notion of pride can sometimes propel people to do the wrong thing. Appendix A.2 of AU 316 lists several factors that incentivize and pressure employees into committing fraud. It states that if “Financial stability or profitability is threatened by economic, industry, or entity…
This individual was the director of IT at Aultman Hospital in Canton, Ohio. The gentleman actually set up companies that he was the beneficiary of and awarded contracts to said companies for IT support. Ironically, he was the individual that was in charge of authorizing the payments to these companies. Aultman Hospital’s internal controls were unable to see that this was occurring because the internal controls lacked a checks and balance system. Ironically this occurred for many years and approximately $846,877 dollars were being paid out for services not rendered (Balint, 2014). The gentleman even billed for certain IT related services that were performed, unfortunately these services were at an exaggerated cost. Had Aultman not been so financially secure and properly insured, they may have faltered. Often times when issues arise such as this change occurs. In Balint's article Mullen expressed that,” New safeguards have been put in place in light of the fraud case, Mullen said, “A person in a trusted position who has no prior indication of problems can create challenges for any organization,” he wrote. “We have revised controls and procedures for an even more extensive verification of vendor activities. Our processes were strong before; now they are even stronger” (Balint, 2014).…
His position of trust led to him being greedy. It is clear that all three parts of the fraud triangle are present in this case as he had the opportunity and incentive to commit the fraud and was able to rationalize his within himself and to anyone who questioned…
The staff discovered forgeries of corporate financial records, designed to hide the source and application of corporate funds misused for illegal purposes, as well as secret funds that were being given out to certain people. The funds were being used for different reasons, sometimes resulting in questionable or illegal foreign payments. There was serious doubt on the reliability of the corporate records and books which are the base of the disclosure system recognized by the federal securities…
Individuals who do a fraudulent act typically have the opportunity to commit the fraud. It could be because of shoddy internal controls; even with good internal controls a determined person could find a way to override them. A CEO or manager may think they are high enough on the totem pole that no one would question their antics.…
In 2013, the founder of Peregrine Financial Group Inc. sentenced 50 years jail for stealing $250 million from investors and hiding his theft around 20 years. The U.S. Attorney Sean R. Berry of the Northern District of Iowa states that, for years seemed Russell Wasendorf, Sr. was a successful CEO of his own brokerage and respected member of his company, supporting local charity, and creating jobs. But in reality, “he was a con man who built a building on smoke and mirrors”. Russell Wasendorf, Sr. sentenced on variety of factors, such as financial loss, sophistically executed the fraud, and stole money of large number of victims and so on.…
In the article entitled Enron Ten Years Later: Lessons to Remember, the authors Anthony H. Catanach Jr. and J. Edward Ketz discuss the importance of learning from the mistakes made by the senior executives of Enron. The “off-balance sheet” that Andrew Fastow, the CFO of Enron, created to funnel tens of millions of dollars into executives and investors pockets and also hide corporate losses contributed immensely to the demise of the corporation in 2001, which had once been valued at $60 billion. Fastow states in a recent article that "the net effect of all these deals was to create a misrepresentation of the company."…
1. How does Miller fit the profile of the average fraud perpetrator? How does he differ? How did these characteristics make him difficult to detect?…
Bernie Madoff, his brother Peter and several employees were involved in this scheme. Some of the individuals that perpetrated the ponzi scheme are denying any knowledge of the fraudulent activity. Bernie Madoff could not carry out the scheme on his own because it required many different people with their own relevant expertise. The reason that the scheme was conducted for so long is because the participants were financially rewarded for their silence. Preferred employees were paid well. Even as the fraud was about to be exposed, Madoff and his cohorts were trying to give money to select employees and family members. The money they received bought their silence. The corporate culture reinforced this behavior. There was a low tolerance and appreciation for honesty and professional business ethics. The company was running on several layers of lies that if exposed would cause the entire operation to crumble.…