Was Mark correct in what he said to get Jack to continue investigating the problem?
Mark discussed the issue with Jack in a respectful and complimenting manner while providing Jack with one last chance at tackling the design problem. In this conversation, Mark provided greater motivation to help Jack find a single design mechanism. Knowing that Mark looked solely to Jack to provide a solution and he failed to render one may have left Jack feeling unsettled. Mark’s last ditch effort in asking Jack to name another worker who may have a chance to come up with an answer may have nudged Jack enough out of his comfort zone to think “out-of-the-box” and arrive at a possible solution.
Should Mark just have given up on the idea rather than what he said to Jack?
Giving up on the idea does not serve the best interest of the company and its employees as well as other stakeholders. Essentially, due to declining sales to the government due to reduced spending, the vitality of McRoy Aerospace is in question. This one problem of designing a single mechanism for all four sets of doors equates to an entire new sales channel for McRoy Aerospace in the commercial segment. By lowering the life-cycle cost specific to maintenance costs, McRoy has the opportunity to enter the commercial aviation aircraft business.
Should Mark have assigned this to someone else rather than giving Jack a second chance, and if so, how might Jack react?
I agree with Mark allowing Jack a second opportunity to find a solution to the problem. If Mark handed the assignment off to someone else, than Jack may feel dejected.
What should Mark have done if Jack still was not able to resolve the problem?
Considering the impact to the company, Mark should consider forming an internal team to brainstorm for ideas to resolve the issue and if this fails then an outside consultant may be required to assist in the design problem.
Would it make sense for Mark to assign this problem to someone else now, after Jack could not solve the problem the second time around?
I would not consider handing over the project to any one person. At this juncture in consideration of time and necessity, this challenge may best be accomplished through a team effort.
What other options, if any, were now available to Mark? Internal team or outside consultant.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
* the twins (san and eric) say they will help Ralph, but they tel Jack where he's hiding.…
- 254 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
“What happens if we can’t find it and Jack’s spirit haunts us forever? Then what will we do? I don’t think this is such a good…
- 527 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Jack acted as if he was getting tired of Simon’s complaining in the beginning of the story. Whenever Simon would faint Jack would shrug it off as if it was nothing, this could imply that Jack didn’t really care for Simon and was becoming an annoyance to him.…
- 665 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the early stages of the book, Jack is still portrayed as an innocent young boy, being very afraid with the idea of killing a living creature. “I let them go. I had to go on. I…” Jack realizes that the boys are craving for meat and successful hunting is crucial to satisfy their needs. However, throughout the whole quote, Jack…
- 685 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
He yelled and got everyone on the camp’s attention, which halted the argument. He opened the speech by reminding everyone that they have been on the island for six days and there is still no sign of anyone off the island even knowing they crashed. Jack states, “we’ve been waiting…. Waiting for someone to come. But what if they don’t”, which is a good use of rhetoric. Jack uses logos when he says, “Every man for himself is not going to work. It’s time to start organizing. We need to figure out how we are going to survive here”, because he persuades by the use of logic. While everyone else is turning against each other, Jack makes the logical point that they have to come up with a system. Jack uses the pathos appeal at the end of the speech when he says, “if we can’t leave together…… we’re gonna die alone.” This is clearly an appeal to the emotions of the people on camp because no one wants to die and Jack definitely hits home when he chooses to close the speech that way. Jack’s speech also may use some ethos because he is the respected leader of the group and most people believe he is credible. However, Jack’s speech is more on the pathos and logos side of…
- 1144 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
A. A species of vole was found to have a type II functional response. At very low food densities what do you expect to limit feeding rate the most? (3pts)…
- 691 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
He didn’t say. He got angry and made us tie Wilfred up. He’s been’--he giggled excitedly--‘he’s been tied for hours, waiting--’” (Golding 159). At first, the situation sounds very ambiguous, but with closer interpretation, it is clear that Jack is abusing his power. Instead of following an ordered system of trial, Jack is “going to beat” Wilfred without a proper accusation. When “[Robert] giggled excitedly”, he doesn’t understand the implications behind a fair and equal justice system. Without a strong justice system, people like Wilfred are faced with punishments that they don’t deserve. As Beccaria had believed, a strong justice system helps enforce the laws, maintain order within a society, and provide people like Wilfred with fair trials. After this scene, the boys slowly began to lean towards savagery. When they refused to instill a fair and equal justice system, this led them to a state of inhumanity. These consequences further led them to an immoral society as Beccaria had predicted. The lack of a proper justice system ultimately leads the boys to…
- 365 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
4. He scolds Jack for hunting while he should have been watching the fire and he tells him he can’t even build a hut. This act symbolizes Jack’s true violent nature and that he is really just a bully.…
- 732 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Throughout the novel, the characters could not communicate effectively. This was shown when Ralph and Jack agreed that they should make a signal fire. But later on in the novel Jack and the hunters forgot about the signal fire. Ralph was angry with Jack because he “let the…
- 1476 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
At first Jack has trouble killing a pig but once he accomplishes doing it he can’t stop, “the opaque, mad look came into his eyes again.” he’s an action person the consequence of this is it affects other people, an example of this would be when he left the fire to go hunt and ruined a rescue opportunity, as the book goes on we see Jack cares less about being rescued “Jack had to think for a moment before he could remember what rescue was.” because he is happy with the life he has created on the island, whereas rescue means everything to Ralph the first…
- 973 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Jack is trying to tell her the truth, but she blindly stands in defense for Lucky, and does not realize the consequences of not trusting Jack. Behind the scenes, Jack has really been protecting Jane the entire time. When Jane meets Claire in the Chemistry lab, Claire mentions, “I would have done it [killed you] before, but Jack spent nights sleeping near your cottage,” in which Jane thought to herself, “Jack had watched out for me!” (p.312). This statement by Claire clearly contrasts the original thought Jane had about Jack, in which he is up to no by good creeping outside her cottage. The moment she hears Claire mentions these lines, her thoughts about Jack turns around 180 degrees, as Jane begins to realize the truth, that Jack had truly been looking out for her the entire time. After escaping the Chemistry lab, Jane is found unconscious, and not breathing. Jack finds her on the ground, and begins to do CPR on her (p.319). This shows how Jane is blind to Jack’s original intentions, as her love for Lucky dominates her, causing her to shield out other information. In the end, after all truth has been unveiled, Jane ends up dating Jack, a boy who genuinely cares and looks out for her. If it were not for Jack, Jane would not be alive at this point in the book. Her original preference for Lucky and her hatred for Jack clearly blind her from Jack’s true intentions,…
- 1535 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Jack is constantly hunting pigs and obsessing over the fact that he cannot catch one. He is also undermining other more important tasks. Even when Ralph expelling his distaste of the other boys work habits, he…
- 951 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Some people on this island just don't realize that they've got to put first things first if they ever want to be rescued. Today we could have been saved by a passing ship, had Jack and his stupid hunters paid attention to the rescue fire. You see, it's their job to maintain and watch the fire. Unfortunately, Jack and his hunters picked today of all days to neglect the fire and when a ship passed by the island, there was no signal to be seen because the fire was dead. When Jack and the hunters returned from their hunt, they were chanting a frightening chant and carrying a dead pig. Ralph reprimanded Jack for his lack of responsibility, and Jack got mad but he apologized. When I complained about the hunters' immaturity, Jack hit me real hard and broke one of the lenses of my…
- 656 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One part that strongly suggests that Jack is not the better leader, has more savage ideas and actions, and is very irrational, is when he drives a knife into a tree during a meeting that took place at the beginning of the novel. “He snatched his knife out of the sheath and slammed it into a tree trunk. Next time there would be no mercy. He looked round fiercely, daring them to…
- 433 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
C. conduct informal discussion with outsiders, including intermediaries, to see if he has correctly defined the problem…
- 541 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays