Just being humans is enough to display our worth and value. Our essential significance does not hang on to anything else - it does not depend on whether we are having a good life or enjoy the pleasures of it, or whether we are improving th lives of those who surround us. We exist, so we have value. In addition, this actual can mean it is our duty to live and because we have value and significance we should not just put an end to our suffering because we are in pain, whether emotional or physical. To do that is not to have reverence our inborn value. Therefore, I would assess that Immanuel Kant was against the procedure of euthanasia. Before exploring the realm of situation ethics and philosophy, Joseph Fletcher was a priest. He soon turned to Situation ethics that stated that the morality of the choice or decision made depends on the position you are in. In India, a man could no longer afford to feed his children so; he put them up for adoption for a better chance of life. This can be seen as a situational ethics. Since this concept is based on, unexpected positions you are put it into it had no actual maxim and set of …show more content…
My religion does not correspond with euthanasia whatsoever. Taking the choice of removing ourselves from this planet should not be up to us. However, I notice when the setting or scene is more compassionate that is when people are more open and compassionate with the idea of euthanasia. If I was diagnosed with the terminal illness and wanted to perform euthanasia more people would a approve rather if I was someone who just did not find sheer joy in life and wanted to go to one of the several states that legalize it or Switzerland. I feel as though if everyone looked at the concept at a more compassionate viewpoint and sympathize with the individual who wants to go through with it then it would be more accepted and legalize. However, we live in a world where everyone’s opinions are so